iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stephanie Woodard

Stephanie Woodard

Posted: September 20, 2010 05:35 PM

Native Americans have long faced police harassment, illegal voter challenges, and election-day chaos on the way to the polls in South Dakota. Those problems may soon be over on the Oglala Sioux Tribe's Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. That's because South Dakota has no clear plan to provide any voting at all in this fall's election.

The imminent disenfranchisement of thousands of voters follows resignations of officials from an off-reservation county who handled outsourced, non-tribal government services, including elections, on a freelance basis for Pine Ridge's Shannon County. However, the crisis may also have arisen because Oglalas, members of the nation's most marginalized ethnic group, have emerged as deciders in South Dakota elections -- as have tribes in other areas since 2000, when Native support helped send Washington state's Maria Cantwell to the U.S. Senate. With Shannon County voters turning in the nation's highest Democratic performance in recent presidential elections, sidelining them is a game-changer in close contests, including this year's race for the state's sole Congressional seat, held by Democrat Stephanie Herseth Sandlin.

South Dakota's head election official, Secretary of State Chris Nelson, has taken a hands-off approach to the problem, saying the counties involved should solve it. If they don't, said Attorney General Marty Jackley, who's up for re-election, "the state will weigh the need to take action."

"What if the counties don't work it out? What's the state's plan B?" asked South Dakota Democratic Party head Erin McCarrick. She accused the Republican-controlled state administration, including Nelson and Jackley, of "foot-dragging" as the election gets underway Sept. 20 with early voting. This year, Oglalas had hoped for the full six weeks of this convenient and widely popular type of advance polling. Early voting has seldom been provided in Native communities, but when it has, as many as 46 percent of voters have used it.

Here's the background: As required by Shannon County's charter, its commissioners contract out functions such as collecting taxes, issuing license plates, and running elections to officials of a neighboring district. For years, that district has been Fall River County. Then, during a raucous Sept. 3 meeting, monitored by plainclothes officers sent by Jackley, Fall River officials quit, saying they did so to protest the commissioners firing a sheriff. In giving notice, the officials also demolished Shannon County's government infrastructure. They did not resign from their Fall River posts.

Maybe it's good that somewhere along the line Fall River County lost its AK-47 (a big gun, for those unfamiliar with firearms). "I've looked all over for it," said a departing Fall River official. "Now, I'm not even sure we owned one." Meanwhile, a judge has reinstated the sheriff with a writ of quo warranto (Latin for "who put you in charge?"), an obscure legal maneuver devised in 13th-century England.

Getting back to the 21st century: Secretary of State Nelson says he can't provide a substitute election officer; and he isn't shaking loose Help America Vote Act funds to facilitate a full-fledged Shannon County election. Instead, he's promoting mail-in absentee ballots as a solution.

"Right. Let 'em eat cake," said Greg Lembrich, legal director of nonpartisan voting-rights group, Four Directions, and an attorney at the law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. "Folks on reservations don't have easy access to the photocopiers or notaries needed to apply for and complete mail-in ballots."

And there's no election official, so no one to collect and count the ballots, added O.J. Semans, Four Directions' executive director and a Sicangu Lakota from Rosebud Sioux Reservation, also in South Dakota. "Native people aren't asking for anything special here. We just want equal access to voting." He called the commotion over the sheriff a distraction that allowed the state to pull a rabbit out of the hat: Presto, no voting for Oglalas.

South Dakota's own constitution guarantees equal suffrage, Lembrich said. He also pointed to the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment: "It requires states to provide equal protection under the law. It doesn't go on to say, 'unless states delegate authority to counties, in which case the states can wash their hands of the issues.'"

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice says it's on the case. Last April, DOJ produced a stern document designed to end the mosh pit of Shannon County elections. Among many provisions, poll workers can't make "inappropriate comments" and must provide Lakota-language voting materials when needed.

"That's all irrelevant if it's impossible to vote," said Semans. "And if you don't vote, you don't have a place at the table."


 
Native Americans have long faced police harassment, illegal voter challenges, and election-day chaos on the way to the polls in South Dakota. Those problems may soon be over on the Oglala Sioux Tribe'...
Native Americans have long faced police harassment, illegal voter challenges, and election-day chaos on the way to the polls in South Dakota. Those problems may soon be over on the Oglala Sioux Tribe'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curledup
05:10 PM on 09/28/2010
Thanks, Stephanie, for bringing more attention to this mess. The Republican/conservative majority's leaders here in SD have a vested interest in keeping Native votes suppressed, and allowing the process to be as difficult as possible is hardly a surprise. We've got some of the poorest counties in the country on our reservations, and how often do "fiscal conservatives" care about that?
11:20 PM on 09/21/2010
If the State of South Dakota does step forward to ensure that the people of Shannon County and the Oglala Sioux have the right to vote, I hope the Department of Justice steps in. There is no excuse for this in our country. Shannon County is large and spread out. While most of South Dakota doesn't need to travel more than 5-10 miles at the most, the people in this area are expected to travel 50-75 miles to vote already. Now they don't even have that! Not only should they be allowed to vote, the whole system needs to be changed so they have the right to vote 1) on election day, 2) or as absentee voters, 3) within a reasonable distance from home, 4) without discrimination against their race or economic level.
09:48 PM on 09/21/2010
Of course this is a partisan issue, people rarely claim something to be non-partisan unless the non-partisan stance is the same as their party's stance. Nobody here has said a word about how the people of Fall River county are supposed to vote.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephanie Woodard
04:42 PM on 11/13/2010
Just to reassure you -- Fall River County never had a voting problem. The officials in questions were elected in Fall River and retained their posts there through all of this. Voting and all other government functions were never interrupted. However, these officials also had freelance gigs, if you will, with Shannon County for additional fees on top of their Fall River salaries. It was those outsourced freelance jobs that they resigned, thus shutting down Shannon County.

I was in the Fall River courthouse during the height of this problem, and all services for that county were completely normal. FYI, there are two SD counties -- Shannon and Todd, which include the Pine Ridge and Rosebud reservations, respectively -- that are organized under the so-called Home Rule system, which allows them to outsource certain functions.
01:31 PM on 09/21/2010
Although I feel many people will place this problem as a party issue it is not it is a voting rights issue. South Dakota needs to do the right thing and allow equal access to the polls as it does with the rest of it's citizens within the State of South Dakota. If it was equal this would not be an issue.
09:20 AM on 09/21/2010
This is typical of SD politics. It has been an on going problem. Areas are isolated and often only 1 polling station is available - so many have to drive 60-80 miles or more. It is a large spread out area. Rosebud has similar problems. They try to disenfranchise the Native American vote because it is generally pro-democrat. This year there is a close race for the only house seat. There is also still some racist views towards Native Americans in this state. I still spend summers up here and it is fairly obvious. Also - some don't like the "n*****" in the White House. I hear that more often than I care too.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Louise Farr
08:06 PM on 09/20/2010
Glad Woodard is bringing this to light. How can this be happening in the U.S. in 2010?
08:01 PM on 09/20/2010
One more reason why we can't let states have control over our constitutional rights...they can't be trusted to do the right thing, regardless of what Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, etal seem to think. The fact that stuff like this is still happening in America is why we have to remain ever vigilant about protecting the constitutional rights of ALL Americans.
09:49 PM on 09/20/2010
While this does appear to be a matter in which the Federal Government should become involved it does not prove that States should be abolished as you seem to imply. Each State has it's own Constitution but all are subordinate to the Constitution of USA. Without their own power to write and adminster laws States would be nothing more than names of areas of land. Those who think that all laws should be the same throughout America always seem to think that the laws they like would be enforced. Perhaps an America without strong States would have laws more similar to Arizona and Utah than California or Massachusetts. In the matter discussed above, publicity will bring about change, everyone cares about voting rights (except for Democrats when the issue is counting the votes of our soldiers overseas).
10:23 PM on 09/20/2010
Who said anything about "abolishing" the states?

Publicity may bring change... in 2011. In light of your closing comment, I'm sure you don't mind that at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Cantor
I am a human being descended from a small group of
10:40 PM on 09/20/2010
This pending act of voter disenfranchisement is happening in a very RED state of probably Blue voters, so how does that lead you to believe everyone except for Dems cares about voting rights?
07:38 PM on 09/20/2010
What is this, the South in the 1950s? Partisan politics at its worst. I hope they get this figured out in time to give the Oglala Sioux Tribe a voice.