Moment of Truth In Afghanistan, Iran, Israel-Palestine, Southeast Asia, Africa, FSU

http://ow.ly/npFP Afghan War Needs New Strategy: US Commander McChrystal

I include many areas where the world faces huge challenges, including the former Soviet Union (FSU).

We make a mistake when we segment challenges. One boat rocks others. We may not be gaia but there is some truth to our interdependence.

In all these situations, violence is active or incipient. In all of them, there is no solution being proposed that promises an end to the prospect of more of the same.

To cite examples:

There is every possibility that Iran will remain firm in refusing to stop enriching uranium and this will activate Israel eventually. If that happens the US may not be far behind.

There is every chance that the civil violence (if that is not an oxymoron) in many areas of the FSU will continue and that worsening economic conditions there will exacerbate conflict. Again involving other nations including the US.

In Africa there are at least five situations in which any notion of rights and decent behavior is a pipe dream without international action that would involve the US.

In Asia, Burma and Sri Lanka are merely the most conspicuous examples of continuing repression. I have not even mentioned North Korea.

And in Afghanistan we have the head US military man suggesting that with more resolve and manpower we can succeed -- a truth that is no more likely to hold than the belief that Iraq will be a stable and unified democracy over time.

No serious thinker following Nietzsche and living through the Holocaust believes that the world can permanently weather a continuation of the dynamics which gave rise to the cataclysmic wars of the 20th Century.

We cannot weather full economic breakdown and a global nuclear winter.

How then are we to proceed?

I see no way other than for our President to declare a global emergency and address the underlying issue of a global military-industrial complex and a reliance on force that is fueled by governments still operating with 20th century notions that the sword is the instrument of peace and justice.

President Obama needs to declare a restructuring of the moral apparatus of the world. Realpolitik must be seen as the politics of negotiation and peace. Religion must be seen as the proximate capacity to dream, not as a license to kill. Economies must be made to create sustainable communities, not fortress societies.

Only the leadership of courageous persons can accomplish the movement needed today. Specifically, in Afghanistan we need to understand that there cannot be a military victory, period. In the future the only real victories will be those of aroused peoples who insist that the ways of war be permanently shelved. This will mean more movements like those in Iran following the most recent elections.

The President needs to stand at the helm of a global civil rights movement. He needs to show that realism is not inconsistent with this. He needs to hark back to Eisenhower and identify the military-industrial complex as the true enemy of civilization.

This is a moment of truth. This is not one person's belief. It is the stance of all who have lived under the lash of the global war machine. We must reject the leadership of those for whom belief in force has overcome belief in themselves.

The moment of truth is a reappropriation of who we are and of our inherent possibilities.

http://stephencrose.wordpress.com

Follow Stephen C. Rose on Twitter: www.twitter.com/stephencrose

Comments

[lastpost]

“No serious thinker following Nietzsche”

Wasn’t he the guy whose whole philosophy was espoused by the Nazis, then cynically manipulated to serve their own diabolical ends? (BB)

“How then are we to proceed?”

If I hold a belief, be it of philosophical, religious, scientific or any other nature. Do I hold that belief because holding a belief appears preferable to not holding a belief?
If so, then any belief should suffice.

Or, do I hold a belief because I believe it to be true?
In which case, am I not obliged to challenge and re-challenge it? Since if true, testing should only serve to strengthen it. And if false, why would I want to perpetuate it?
In addition, if I personally choose or am not permitted to question it. Is that because I or others already suspect that it is fatally flawed?

[Stephen C. Rose - Huffpost Blogger]

Don't worry I have the interim covered. See: http://stephencrose.wordpress.com I just think the above is the long term solution. Cheers, S

[altohone]

I voted for the man even though he made it very clear he wouldn't try as you suggest.

I'd love to see it, but I don't expect to.


How about some interim measures like prosecuting those who authorized torture, investigating Wall Street abuses and oil price manipulation?

Same gang, narrower scope.