More

Stephen C. Rose

Stephen C. Rose

Posted: November 10, 2008 04:59 PM

Petulant AT&T TV Ads Bother Me -- Do They Bother You?


By Stephen C. Rose

Since I write a political blog and have no particular brief to write about TV advertisements, I thought long and hard about doing anything at all.

But Huff offers an ideal platform for the sort of piece where one hangs a bit of personal umbrage on a cultural phenomenon that almost everyone knows about -- I am referring to the AT&T advertisements that offer a window on forms of petulance and juvenile behavior and sheer unattractiveness that bother me immensely.

Right up there with the overheated hawking of Andrew Sullivan, which now necessitates changing the channel.

But then I noticed that AT&T has evidently decided to keep throwing this stuff at us. Developing more and more of these ads.

The typical form of this ad is to begin with a lament about there being no bars. I do not drink or visit bars so am not in their demographic But I am tolerant.

The ads typically disintegrate into spoiled and rude rants about being stuck in a social setting one abhors. It is a fast burn.

But my reaction is that Americans are still ugly.

Ironically, this advertising has nothing to do with whether I would patronize AT&T. Which makes me wonder what the purpose of these ads is.

If the purpose is to be funny, they are not funny. They are pathetic. More or less like filming us in our worst moments. Maybe they could be called attack ads -- diss the ones you're with.

Whatever the idea. I cannot figure out why it makes good business sense to run demeaning ads.

But then a light went off in my beleaguered mind.

Where better to find answers than in the knowing precincts of Huff Post?

I am sure that I, like Rachel, can be talked down on this. Or better yet, educated in the arcane cynicism that gave rise to these sad ads.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:07 AM on 11/11/2008
The commercials are like everything else AT&T does -- they're backassward.

Maybe they'll put them out of business -- for good.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
08:37 PM on 11/10/2008
I have a nice way to defeat commercials. I watch tv with my computer up and I fool around with Napster playlists. When commercials come up I put on my favorite songs. Drowning the negative with the uplifting.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
07:45 PM on 11/10/2008
Just since writing this I have noticed the same tendency in other commercials.
photo
TexasDem0
USMC Vietnam combat vet
05:55 PM on 11/10/2008
There has been a growing and disturbing trend in advertising that suggests there is humor in people doing mean things to other people. Causing misery for another person is simply not funny. It is a sign of a sick mind. Thinking that it is funny is a sign of an even sicker mind. The advertising agencies which create these ads and their corporate counterparts who approve them are equally misguided.
photo
lesterbud
Facts ARE Liberty
05:22 PM on 11/10/2008
Bad - yes.
Offensive - I am pretty hard to offend.
But that is where Volkswagen comes in.
People are having babies so they can get German engineering?
Wow - what test market did they try this out on?
Women - I'm sure they want to get knocked up so they can put a baby seat in the back of this vehicle.
Men - Being manipulated into getting these women pregnant.
Now, let's talk about how Jews might feel about the concept of German engineering as it pertains to reproduction.
Nonsense at best - highly offensive if they mean what I think they mean.