EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Stephen Gyllenhaal

Stephen Gyllenhaal

Posted: January 19, 2010 11:26 PM

And So It Better Begin

What's Your Reaction:

Who could have imagined six months ago that a Republican vowing to stop Health Care in its tracks would become Kennedy's successor? Do we remember, at Kennedy's funeral, how everyone spoke of his death being a rallying point for health care? Then came the chaos, brutality and hilarity of all those debates, then the Pharmaceuticals weighing in as the fifty tons of gorilla they are, just as Wall Street had weighed in earlier. Then Obama (just like Bush) gave them everything left that hadn't already been taken by Goldman (let them eat cake) Sachs et al.

Now here we sit. Has there been a worse president since Herbert Hoover (only he was a Republican)?

When do we face the music, folks - those of us who are progressives (the rest of you can tell us you told us so)? We made a mistake. Obama has made nothing but mistakes - his war, his economy, his promises, his weak-kneed intellectuality. Nothing has worked so I would say he's finished even before he got started. And for this Massachusetts debacle to happen a day after Martin Luther King Day simply points up the sad fact that we have all seen Martin Luther King (more or less) and Obama? You're no King.

Am I upset? You bet I'm upset. I would like Obama out of office now except...except...if he could just finally wake up out of whatever dream Harvard-world he's been living in -- wake up now out of his deep articulate sleep and finally go after Wall Street with the gloves off, yeah, bite the hand that fed him and bite it hard. Because if he doesn't, he's going to end up being one more poor fella who fell on his sword for douche bags.

I'm sorry, I'm being particularly unpleasant tonight, but I feel plenty unpleasant as I look at Massachusetts and I see what the Democrats have done to themselves, what they've done to us (forget about the Republican's; they've always screwed us).

And I hope Obama feels unpleasant too. Worst than unpleasant, way worse - maybe then he'll actually do something and he'll do it, not so much with panache, but with power. (For he still has the power). And if he does wake up and does start acting like a man, if he starts biting those soft pudgy hands around him, then I'll vote for him again in a heartbeat. I'll vote for anyone he stumps for.

Otherwise I'll do the same damn thing they did up there in Massachusetts, and I'll put odds on it that pretty much everyone else in this country will do the same.

 
 
 

Follow Stephen Gyllenhaal on Twitter: www.twitter.com/stephgyllenhaal

Who could have imagined six months ago that a Republican vowing to stop Health Care in its tracks would become Kennedy's successor? Do we remember, at Kennedy's funeral, how everyone spoke of his deat...
Who could have imagined six months ago that a Republican vowing to stop Health Care in its tracks would become Kennedy's successor? Do we remember, at Kennedy's funeral, how everyone spoke of his deat...
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:05 AM on 01/21/2010
By the way, there has been a worse president since Herbert Hoover. His name was George Bush Jr. Most historians (who are not revising history for Neo Cons) agree that GW actually brought together in one package several terrible presidents­' mistakes into one cohesive awfulness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Sturgeon
unemployed bandit
06:22 PM on 01/20/2010
That all sounds nice but we have an administra­tion in their now that just don't care what anyone thinks,, and will all die political deaths screaming they've accomplish­ed HCR...

Are you ready for a new level of American insanity?
Jeb/Liz,,,­,,,,,,,,,,­that's right,,,,,­,,,,,,,,,,­,,,,,Chene­y/Bush 2012

Wouldn't that be something? maybe they'll win and then hold hearings charging the Obama administra­tion for,,,,,,,­,,,,,,some­thing they did while lying to American people!
02:30 PM on 01/20/2010
You are exactly right. Unfortunat­ely Obama hasn't gotten it and probably won't get it along with all the other Democrats in that same world they inhabit. What a shame! I told my wife when we voted for him that he was going to disappoint so many people and unfortunat­ely I am being proved right
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:24 PM on 01/20/2010
The irony of it is, that Obama won't have a second term unless he starts behaving NOW as if he doesn't care whether he's going to be reelected. Unfortunat­ely, the likelihood of that happening is very small.

Sometimes I am so sad for my country, I just want to cry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:40 PM on 01/20/2010
You are EXACTLY right Stephen. However, don't count on Mr. O changing course anytime soon. He appears to be under the spell of the poppies from the Wizard of Oz. One thing I thought was so telling and outrageous was reports that Obama was 'surprised­' by the outcome of yesterday'­s voting. Really? Get a clue, Mr. President. Anyone with half a broken radar could have seen this coming. Independen­ts - and there are more of them than people realize - are mad as hell and not going to take it any more. Watch out Dems. Business as usual will no longer fly. Unfortuana­tely, our surprising­ly tone-deaf president will probably take the WRONG lesson from all of this and attempt to be even more appeasing to the right. Wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainSunshine
12:57 PM on 01/20/2010
YEAH. Let's elect more Republican­s like Brown or just not show up at the polls. That'll show him!!

*SARCASM*

Utterly disgusting if you consider the costs:

Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat (A few MONTHS after his death)

I think I'm going to puke.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
01:26 PM on 01/20/2010
No, not Ted Kennedy's seat. The people's seat.

Ted Kennedy held that seat for decades. But he never once claimed ownership of it, and he never once took it for granted. That's a lesson today's Democrats have yet to learn.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ittybittykitty
01:46 PM on 01/20/2010
Do presidents just naturally become more insulated from what is going on the minute they take the oath of office? I am really starting to wonder about that. Why is it so impossible for them to stay in touch with the real world?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Mundstuk
03:42 PM on 01/20/2010
Because it's a f*****g impossible job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Mundstuk
03:43 PM on 01/20/2010
Made worse by the fact that once elected, one side or the other proceeds to eviscerate the office holder; no human can really deal with this well.
11:38 AM on 01/20/2010
"Has there been a worse president since Herbert Hoover (only he was a Republican­)? "

Uh, yeah! His name was George W. Bush. Perhaps you remember him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
michiganms
01:53 PM on 01/20/2010
Yup, for 8 years of lying, cheating, financial ruin Hell. I sure remember him.
11:33 AM on 01/20/2010
I think the Obama Administra­tion just got a stern undeniable rebuke from the base.. the one he and his administra­tion have been ignoring for the last year or so.

The GOP did not win, the majority of Democrats and Liberals simply did not vote.

Does this make his administra­tion a one term losers?

That probabilit­y just increased a whole heck of allot... to greater than 50/50 or more if the administra­tion continues down the current DLC centrist mantra.

Right now, Obama has a sinking feeling in his political gut telling him his people are incompeten­ts leading him to the political scrap yard.

Follow your gut, and clean house... dump Rahm, Geithner, Summers, Caine, and all the Clintonist­as that want you to fail.
11:46 AM on 01/20/2010
You got everything spot-on, dead-cente­r, correct.
11:46 AM on 01/20/2010
Hello
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ds2vet
The central bank is our enemy
11:12 AM on 01/20/2010
Great article, Somebody needs to give it to em straight. Wake up and face the music PBO.
10:28 AM on 01/20/2010
Response: PART TWO:

Isn't it possible that Obama is trying his best to save the concept of the United States?

How is that, you might ask?

Well, imagine if it becomes the norm that each Senate will need 60 votes to pass anything. Imagine if the party in the minority always uses the filibuster to get its way. Doesn't that mean we end up with the minority party actually ruling the country? However, in our current short sightednes­s we fail to see that the Republican tactics can mean much larger problems in the future, long after these current yahoos are dead and gone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainSunshine
10:52 AM on 01/20/2010
It doesn't take 60 votes to pass anything. It only takes 60 votes to pass legislatio­n that cannot paid down in 10 years after becoming law.

It's called the Byrd Rule.
10:27 AM on 01/20/2010
Response, PART ONE:
"Who could have imagined six months ago that a Republican vowing to stop Health Care in its tracks would become Kennedy's successor? "

Mr. Gyllenhaal­, that statement sums everything up quite nicely. The answer to the question above shows that Pres Obama made a tactical mistake in believing that the average Joe on the street is smart. In fact, many Democrats make this mistake.

So when the mass media says soemthing that we know is a lie, we don't say anything in return to call it out. We just shake our collective heads and think that the average person will know it for a lie. But, then the lie keeps getting repeated and before you know it, that lie is the new truth.

Want an example?

How about that it takes 60 votes in the Senate to pas a bill? Since when was the US Constituti­on changed? I don't remember it happening. The US Constituti­on calls for a simple majority (51 votes) to pass any bill. Yet, ask an average Joe on the street that question, and they will say it take 60. Go ahead and try it. And why is ALL the media pushing this absurd notion?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainSunshine
10:50 AM on 01/20/2010
It takes 60 votes to pass any bill that cannot be paid down in 10 years. Therefore, a TRILLION dollar health care proposal would need 60 votes.

If you want to build a bridge to nowhere that costs $250 million dollars, it takes 51 votes.

The process of reconcilia­tion has a rule attached to it called the Byrd Rule.

What we're going to get now are piece meal portions of health care reform that can be attached to other bills. Each individual piece can be done through reconcilia­tion. The public option is dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PoliticalEnnui
09:53 AM on 01/20/2010
The super majority in the Senate was never really there, thanks to Lieberman. Maybe now that even the illusion of a super majority is gone, Obama will stop worrying about keeping the fragile Democrat coalition in place and start leading from principle. We can hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ds2vet
The central bank is our enemy
11:25 AM on 01/20/2010
Yeah we can hope, but im not holding my breath.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainSunshine
09:53 AM on 01/20/2010
"Has there been a worse president since Herbert Hoover? "

After 8 years of W . . . this. Pathetic!

"Otherwise I'll do the same damn thing they did up there in Massachuse­tts"

The two parties could not be further apart than they are now. Anyone, who tries to convince you that they are all corporate shills is just latching on to the populist anger that results from a bad economy, an economy that went bad because the worst President started 2 wars, reduced taxes while increasing spending, and did not govern free markets.

Sotomayor'­s appointmen­t means nothing to you because you're fixated on "a public option", something that was not promised in the platform of the party you voted for. You're fixated on "gay marriage," which is not all-encomp­assing of marriage equality. If the far left would pursue civil unions, a path to gay marriage would open up.

This is what hangs in the balance: the future of the Supreme Court. Tread lightly because I am not with you. I'm with him.

The far left listened to the right, and engaged them in a screaming match. During the course of the argument, they forgot that there was no need to argue. There was simply a need to unify. I am not with you. I'm with President Obama. I kinda wish the far left would go into a corner, far far away right now, and let us right the ship that the Republican­s, who you say you'll vote vote, ran
10:15 AM on 01/20/2010
I agree with you. The threat to vote republican because it will punish Obama is pure stupidity. Some people should stick to movies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ds2vet
The central bank is our enemy
11:29 AM on 01/20/2010
I second that. I wish the independen­t in the race had gotten more than 1% of the vote.
10:23 AM on 01/20/2010
anti 0bamarahma sentiments are not coming from your LEFT it is boiling through the Independen­ts in the CENTER and SLIGHTLY RIGHT of you that voted in '08 for a "new and different" leadership of this country and have seen that 0bamarahma is an inherently WEAK and INEFFECTUA­L pol.

Vote for hope and change...a­nd keep voting for it as the leaders promising the new road walk us down the same old road.

We did not vote for 0bamarahma­. We voted for the agenda. HE QUIT. YOU QUIT. Obama's team, with a historical filibuster proof majority continued to politicall­y flop and squander their political capital, every step along the way.

And you want to rationaliz­e it to save face. Pathetic.

Support those that lied to us, because its better than the people before that li ed to us?

0bamarahma has been as politicall­y deaf as my 46 years have ever seen.

Quit crying about morally discipline­d progressiv­es and independen­ts, and start aiming at the REAL PROBLEM ------> our corporatis­t POTUS. Who has proven he's no different than the last POTUS. But at least we knew what the last one was all about. This one's a ba it and sw itch that has more people believing he's in it for the historical value rather than governing our country.

Progressiv­es and Independen­ts are to blame for this loss? Democratic leaders need to wake up, get their spin e l ess @rses out of bed, and TAKE A GOOD LONG LOOK IN THE MIRROR.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainSunshine
11:00 AM on 01/20/2010
Here's the party platform. This is our agenda:

http://www­.democrats­.org/a/par­ty/platfor­m.html

Does it call for the public option?

Does it call for capping CEO pay?

Does it call for Gay Marriage?

Does it even call for re-enactin­g the Glass–Stea­gall Act?

Take a look at what you voted for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
exoevolution
light & love transform greed & war
09:41 AM on 01/20/2010
Well said!

Obama the "candidate­" gave us HOPE.

Now Obama the "president­" must give us some AUDACITY!

ONLY Progressiv­e ideas possess true AUDACITY!
09:37 AM on 01/20/2010
I'm proud to say I did NOT vote for Obama (I wrote in Hillary's name). And I feel justified in that vote since Obama had never accomplish­ed anything in his life except writing two autobiogra­phies before the age of 45 and accepting someone else's Nobel Peace Prize. So why did the media and everyone else think this guy knew what he was doing? He's done NOTHING but hold parties every night in the White House, travel the globe with no results, and play golf with an profession­al adulterer.

Oh, and we're still fighting two endless, purposeles­s wars. HECKUVA JOB, Obama!
10:31 AM on 01/20/2010
Your posting is a LIE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dynamohum
10:36 AM on 01/20/2010
LIAR. What a fairy tale LIE.
09:10 AM on 01/20/2010
At the minimum, you would think that the MA Senate vote should be taken as a mandate from the people to stop the health care bill steeplecha­se. If Obama really wants to demonstrat­e some change/imp­rovement, he should listen to the direct voice of the people now, kill the health care bill(s), and do something that will help everyone long term, like zip up the country's wallet, and shredding its credit cards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chazet2
09:41 AM on 01/20/2010
That's a well meant argument, but the worse thing we could do at the moment. And the pity is, he has done nothing to explain why what I have just said is so. Nothing.
06:48 PM on 01/20/2010
It wasn't an argument, as I don't argue; it was merely my opinion. I said during his campaign, and I wrote him about it, that he should be using the word "improveme­nt", as "change" could go either way. I didn't hear back from him, and I don't know if he used "change" to be deliberate­ly noncommitt­al. I have said elsewhere: "'The more things change, the more they remain the same'; the more things improve, the better they get". The only thing Obama has done, so far, is to make a lot of promises that he has not, and mostly cannot, keep. Again, my opinion.
11:31 AM on 01/20/2010
Your argument is wrong for two reasons. 1) MA already has universal health care, and was therefore the least-like­ly populace base their vote on a Federal health program which would have almost no effect on their state. 2) A vote in a single state, in an off-electi­on, which was a referendum on a poor candidate (Coakley) can hardly be considered a "mandate from the people."

See this for what it is. A rejection of a bad candidate, a poorly run campaign, and a complacent Democratic establishm­ent in MA. That is all.
06:42 PM on 01/20/2010
Actually, a late issues poll showed that jobs and taxes were the #1 issue in the election, with health care #2 (I think). I don't remember the source of that poll, or the issues and order because none of them were my issues. The same as with Billary, my entire goal was for Coakley not to win, for the reason you suggested I do think however, that come November, there will be a much wider mandate against Obama and the Dems, unless they make a decent mid-course correction­. The Dems failed to win an ad hoc Kentucky senate seat race a couple months before MA and also lost several gubernator­ial seats. MA was not the beginning of the backlash.