Stephen M. Davidson is professor of health policy and management at the Boston University School of Management. From 1985 to 1990, he directed the School’s graduate program in health administration studies. Davidson is a graduate of Swarthmore College and has a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. Prior to arriving at Boston University in 1985, he taught at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University. His new book is In Urgent Need of Reform: The U.S. Health Care System, to be published early next year by Stanford University Press. He is author, co-author, or co-editor of five previous books and numerous articles. His books include Medicaid Decisions: A Systematic Analysis of the Cost Problem (1980); The Cost of Living Longer: National Health Insurance and the Elderly (1980) with T.R. Marmor, J.D. Perloff, M. Spear, and N. Aitken; The Physician-Manager Alliance: Building the Healthy Health Care Organization (1996) with M. E. McCollom and J. N. Heineke; and Remaking Medicaid: Managed Care for the Public Good (1998) co-edited with S. A. Somers.

Davidson’s research has explored key issues in the health sector for many years. He began with assessments of Medicaid policies pointing out, among other things, the inverse relationship between eligibility and provider payment rates. He conducted a 13-state study of physician participation in Medicaid, which identified key reasons (in addition to low payment rates) that discouraged physicians from treating Medicaid patients. In the early 1980s, he led a demonstration designed to cut through the heated rhetoric surrounding the managed care initiatives. In Suffolk County, New York, participating physicians were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups to test the effects of prepayment on utilization, expenditures, and physician and patient satisfaction. Other projects included studies of managed care, physician-manager relationships, community health centers, an innovative demonstration of subsidized health insurance, quality of care, and information technology in health care.

Blog Entries by Stephen M. Davidson

By Revealing Their True Colors, Insurers Eliminate Any Reason to Compromise With Them

4 Comments | Posted October 17, 2009 | 03:56 PM (EST)


The release of the PriceWaterhouseCoopers report reveals the insurance industry's true colors for all to see. Everyone who has followed events closely saw insurers publicly supporting reform ("We want to work with you, Mr. President."). The pros knew that, at the same time, their lobbyists have been working hard to...

Read Post

The Devil Is in the Details

1 Comments | Posted September 9, 2009 | 03:52 PM (EST)


Reliance on competition among private insurers is fundamentally a weak approach to health care reform. (The reason is that to keep prices low, insurers have only two levers to pull: they can refuse to insure people at high risk for using services, and they can change the conditions of...

Read Post

Free Now To Do the Right Thing

Posted September 8, 2009 | 06:19 PM (EST)


As the health care reform debates enter their final phases this fall, the Republicans have ended the pretense and revealed themselves to be unwilling to compromise to produce a bipartisan health care reform bill. So, having been freed of the Republican albatross, the president and congressional leaders can concentrate...

Read Post

Reform With and Without a Public Option

3 Comments | Posted August 24, 2009 | 03:23 PM (EST)


The New York Times quotes Congressman Steny Hoyer (Dem, MD) as saying, "I'm for a public option, but I'm also for passing a bill."

Getting this close to passing a bill is an impressive accomplishment given the history of health care reform efforts and...

Read Post

Why the Public Option is Critical

2 Comments | Posted August 19, 2009 | 02:03 PM (EST)


The health reform proposals being considered by Congress depend on private insurance companies competing. Proponents of this strategy believe that to win subscribers from competitors, insurers will need to find innovative ways to keep costs down at the same time they provide good coverage. To keep them focused on...

Read Post

Paying for Health Care Reform -- Part 2

2 Comments | Posted August 13, 2009 | 11:51 AM (EST)


In my previous post, I suggested a simpler, more equitable, less expensive way to pay for health care reform than the plans included in the bills being considered by Congress. Just require that everyone contribute an income-related amount to a dedicated pool of funds for paying insurers and...

Read Post

Paying for Health Care Reform: Part 1

3 Comments | Posted August 12, 2009 | 03:35 PM (EST)


The critical question of how to pay for health care reform seems more difficult than it needs to be because Congress has chosen to rely on a reform strategy that depends on competition among traditional insurance companies. The assumption is that, to win and retain customers, insurers will find...

Read Post