iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stephen Schwartz

GET UPDATES FROM Stephen Schwartz
 

Iranian Sufis Under New Attack

Posted: 09/17/11 06:00 PM ET

Iran is the country in which the Muslim intellectual tradition is most identified with Sufism, the spiritual dimension of Islam -- including such exponents in poetry and philosophy as Rumi, often reputed to be the widest-read versifier in America today. But as reported by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty on Sept. 7, the Iranian clerical establishment has increased a repressive campaign against the Nimatullahi-Gonabadi mystics -- more commonly referred to as "dervishes" -- who make up one of the largest Sufi groups in the country.

The Nimatullahi dervishes, of which the Gonabadis are a branch, began centuries ago as Sunni Muslims but became Shiite Muslim believers during their journey toward intimacy with God -- the goal of all Sufis. Recent state aggression against them commenced in 2006, but was aggravated by the Iranian electoral controversy that began in 2009. RFE/RL's coverage was confirmed by bulletins from the news portal Inside of Iran on Sept. 6 and by monitors such as the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran on Sept. 7.

So far, one Gonabadi dervish, Vahid Banani, has died of a gunshot wound, with at least three more injured by gunfire. Their names are Ibrahim Fazli, Asghar Karimi and Mohammad Ali Saadi. All four came from the town of Sarvestan, about 50 miles southeast of Shiraz, capital of the southwestern province of Fars. A funeral for "the martyr Vahid Banani" was held in Sarvestan on Sept. 8, with the participation of many dervishes as well as local residents, although security forces had blocked roads into the town. But the burial took place without conflict.

Up to 60 people have been rounded up in different locations. Shops and homes owned by Nimatullahi-Gonabadi acolytes have been destroyed in the town of Kovar, also near Shiraz in Fars province. Kovar is said to be surrounded by security and military patrols. Sufis attempting to enter Kovar have been stopped, with their identity papers confiscated.

The most recent government action against the Nimatullahi-Gonabadi followers began in Kars province on Saturday, Sept. 3. The combined reports say the Sufis were detained without warrants, and assaulted by government operatives in plain-clothes and members of the Basij paramilitary volunteers.

According to Inside of Iran, early on Sunday, Sept. 4, high school teacher Gholam Reza Shirazi and two lawyers for the dervishes, Amir Islami and Afshin Kharampour, were summoned to Kovar's government headquarters, but were arrested when they arrived there.

A Nimatullahi-Gonabadi website, Majzooban Nour, states that nine people involved in running the site were jailed in Tehran, the Iranian capital, during a raid on Monday, Sept. 5, and that another lawyer for the Sufis, Farshid Yadollahi, was incarcerated on Sept. 11, while more detentions of adherents to the order are taking place.

The whereabouts of most of the imprisoned dervishes are unknown. The three surviving gunshot victims, Ibrahim Fazli, Asghar Karimi and Mohammad Ali Saadi, had been under care at the Shiraz Rajai hospital, but Fazli has reportedly been transferred to an undisclosed location.

In an interview with the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, Seyed Mustafa Azmayesh, international spokesperson for the Nimatullahi-Gonabadi Sufis, and international relations director of the International Organization to Protect Human Rights in Iran (IOPHRI), said that the repressive actions began in Kovar, but were aimed at dervishes throughout the country. Azmayesh said that anti-Sufi "missionaries" from the ranks of the Basij had been trained in the Shiite seminary of Qom by a special "Commission to Combat Emerging and Pseudo-Spiritual Beliefs" under the direction of the powerful Ayatollah Mohammad Yazdi, head of the Iranian judicial system from 1989 to 1999.

The gunshot victims in Kovar numbered six, according to Azmayesh. He charged that a preacher named Shahbazi had toured the suburbs of Shiraz, as well as Kovar and Sarvestan, denouncing the Sufis. According to the U.S.-subsidized Radio Farda, which broadcasts in Persian, the national language of Iran, groups that attacked the mystics chanted "death to American dervishes." Such agitation resembles similar propaganda heard previously in Iran, as well as in Arab countries like Egypt, where Sufism has been depicted as a tool of American policy.

Azmayesh, however, ascribed the current repression to conflicts in Iranian ruling circles, with followers of the clerical hardliners in Qom moving against the dervishes because of support the Sufis gave to Mehdi Karroubi, one of the leading opposition candidates in the 2009 Iranian presidential elections, who has defended their rights.

The situation of the Sufis in Iran is complex and unfortunate, not least because every attempt to publicize their plight or assist them from outside the country, and especially by American sympathizers, is manipulated by the regime to further attack them.

On first hearing of Sufism, people may imagine that all Sufis meditate by turning on one foot in the ecstatic exercise associated with Rumi. Sufis throughout the world study sacred texts and practice "remembrance of God" in many differing ways, some aloud, some silent, some by physical movements in collective observances, some in stillness and solitude. But Sufis in Muslim countries -- not only in Iran -- are associated with resistance to injustice, and some of the most famous of the Persian Sufis, including Mansur Al-Hallaj, who lived in the ninth to 10th centuries, and Shihab Ad-Din Suhrawardi, who introduced "eastern wisdom" to Islam during the 12th century, were both executed for alleged heresy. The acts of oppression visited on the Nimatullahi-Gonabadi Sufis in Iran today are, perhaps predictably, not without precedents in Islamic history.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
02:39 AM on 09/20/2011
In Europe Sufi orders are involved in considerable amount of intolerance and belligerence against non-Islamic Europeans.
For instance, in 2006 Faizul Aqtab Siddiqi, leader of a Naqshbandi order helped to organize a number of belligerent and violent protests against Danish cartoonists..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
01:25 PM on 09/19/2011
In the political struggle between Ayatollah Islam and Sufi Islam, I would unreservedly would support Sufis.
In a political struggle between Sufi and secularist humanism I would unreservedly would support secular humanism-- the best and only hope for humankind to survive, raise its consciousness level and understand the universe we live in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
01:33 PM on 09/19/2011
I don't support maxim "Enemy of my enemy - my friend" unless it is "Enemy of my enemy - my ally at the moment".
In any struggle within Islamist groups and factions I'd stay out and as far out as possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
02:09 PM on 09/19/2011
Yes- on the first sentence.
But don't you think that your first sentence contradicts the second?
Sufi, the enemy of the Ayatollah Islam, can be a temporary ally of the West.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:32 AM on 09/19/2011
Mr. Schwartz points to another front in the civil war in Islam, between Islamist and all others.
04:10 PM on 09/19/2011
attend to your dominionists first, old man. leave our business to us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 PM on 09/19/2011
Make me.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
12:42 AM on 09/19/2011
I feel really sorry for people who take religion so seriously, making themselves slaves.

Be free, free youself from religion, it's just a burden. If you can't do that, free yourself for a year and see how your life improves because you have gained your sovereignty back.

Religions are the most common cause of war, that should be enough to lead a religionfree life, everywhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
03:10 AM on 09/19/2011
Good post. Faved.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
03:33 AM on 09/19/2011
I was brought up without religion and professed atheism in public until I was grown. I have seen both sides of the argument. Each has its appeal; I chose religion and feel liberated by it. There should be room in modern society for all views on this topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
11:03 AM on 09/19/2011
There IS room for all views. Including critique of irrational basis of Islam and other religions.

"The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity."-- Alan Watts

There's also room to reject this constant and anxious trawling for converts. Surely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
11:59 PM on 09/18/2011
In my humble opinion, if one want to be religious, as might as well be Sufi!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
12:57 AM on 09/19/2011
Anything that contains regressive Shariah cannot be good for anyone.
The world would benefit infinitely more from Zen Buddhism or Taoism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
01:30 AM on 09/19/2011
Absolutely Yiddish!
Either you're provinces, or someone else's province!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
01:44 AM on 09/19/2011
As a US citizen, where's my money!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
thankgodimanatheist8
The answer to fools is silence
10:23 PM on 09/18/2011
A story about the Iranian Sufi Rumi:

When the Iranian mystic Mowllana Jallal-E-Din known as Rumi died the Jews and Christians in Konia joined the procession. Rumi's followers complained to Sultan Valid (Rumi's son). He asked their leaders how come they want to morn the death of a Muslim saint.

The Jews said, "When read the Mathnavi, we understand Moses more than when we read the Torah," and the Christians added, "When we read the Devan, we love Isa more than when we read the Engil."

So Sultan Valid welcomed them and let some be among the pal bearers.

I left some of the words in the original Persian of the above story (not necessarily historically true but written by one of Rumi's followers within twenty years of his death so much more truthful than the bible). Mathnavi and Divan-E-Shams-E-Tabrizi are two of Rumi's greatest works and the Engil is Persian word for the Gospels.
billstewart
Not a micro-biologist
10:22 PM on 09/18/2011
HaleemK, you're posting lots of arguments about why Sufis are heretics who don' t believe in true orthodox Islam, and you'd probably say the same about Baha'is and Ahmadiyya and maybe even Alawites and Druze, who follow prophets who came after Muhammad, and Christians would say the same about Islam and Jews say it about Christians.

But the problem here isn't their lack of religious correctness - it's the Iranian government's practice of killing and imprisoning people because of their religion. That has no place in a civilized society, and if you think it does, you're no better than the Islamophobes in US right-wing politics and as bad as the radical secularists who ran Turkey. Furthermore, if you think your religion tells you to kill infidels, you're skipping the good parts of a religion of peace and love and righteousness.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:21 AM on 09/19/2011
it's the Iranian government­'s practice of killing and imprisonin­g people because of their religion.
==========

The problem goes deeper than that.

"4- To remove all polytheism from the Arabian Peninsula, which is considered a free and pure nation for Islam and its citizens. Therefore it is a special stronghold for Islam, whose protection is not shared with anyone.

http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/06/al-qaradawi-moderate-muslims-accept.html

"It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim."

Book 019, Number 4363

“You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle”

http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/019.smt.html#019.4363

Any Muslim who believes in this Sharia doctrine of Islamic political sovereignty through jihad is part of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
08:02 PM on 09/19/2011
As a non-believer in political sovereignty based on Islamic law or the legitimacy of armed jihad today, I would nonetheless point out that regardless of statements about the Arabian Peninsula ascribed to Muhammad by Umar ibn Khattab -- a controversial figure in Islamic history to say the least -- Christians and some Jews lived in Jeddah until the Wahhabi takeover of the 1920s; a significant number of Jews remained in Yemen, most assuredly part of the Peninsula, until the 1950s, while a small community survives there; and that the Bahraini ambassador to the U,S, is a Bahraini Jewish woman, although the island is not physically part of the peninsula.
04:28 PM on 09/18/2011
I lived long years in muslim countries and know their religion, but never have I heard of this. Take a look.
http://www­.sullivan-­county.com­/wcva/sufi­sm.htm

Since the Qur'an and Saheeh Hadith cannot be changed, the Sufi's have reverted to Ta'weel, a method of changing the apparent meaning of the verse or hadith to have a hidden one. This provided them with sufficient lee-way to support any concept they desired, by simply stating that the verse/hadith had an inner meaning which only the Sheikh himself could know.

In the Bezels of Wisdom, Ibn Arabi presents certain aspects of what he terms "Divine Wisdom," as he conceives it. But Ibn al-Arabi interprets the relevant verses of Surat Noah in the most outrageous fashion, since he suggests meanings diametrically opposed to those accepted by all Muslim scholars. He interprets the "wrongdoe," "infidels," and "sinners" in Surat Noah as 'saints and Gnostics' drowning and burning not in the torment of Hell, but rather in the flames and water of knowledge of God. Ibn Arabi regarded the idols worshipped by Noah's people as divine deities. Allah condemned their deed saying: "And they (Noah's people) said, 'Do not abandon your gods, neither Wad, Suwa', Yaghooth, Ya'ooq nor Nasr'. " [71: 23]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:54 PM on 09/18/2011
So what? Why should people be persecuted for their religious beliefs? Or for having none?
02:32 AM on 09/19/2011
Exactly. The point is Sufis claim to be not only muslims but the heart of Islam. It is apparent those sufis claiming that are not saying the truth. thus they are persecuted.
Sufis defend Islam while Islam attacks them.
04:18 PM on 09/18/2011
Why Sufis attacked by ... ehh muslims:
http://www.sullivan-county.com/wcva/sufism.htm

The word Sufi is most likely to be derived from the Arabic word "soof", meaning wool.
Ibn Taymiyyah said: "There are a people who have chosen and preferred the wearing of woolen clothes, claiming that they want to resemble al-Maseeh ibn Maryam. But the way of our Prophet is more beloved to us, and the Prophet used to wear cotton and other garments."

Although it began as a move towards excessive Ibaadah, such practices were doomed to lead to corruption, since their basis did not come from authentic religious doctrines, but rather from exaggerated human emotions.

By examining the mystic doctrines of Christianity, Hinduism, Taoism and other religions, it becomes clear how closer Sufism is to these religions than to Islam. In fact, Sufism is never characterised under "Islam" in any system of catalogue, but rather under 'Mysticism'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eric steven
u bio
06:14 PM on 09/18/2011
I always read that the word Sufi was derived from a word for "annihilation", as in, annihilate the ego with spiritual work to become closer to G-d.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
10:58 PM on 09/18/2011
These bigoted comments against Sufism merely reflect lack of knowledge and understanding. Sufism is included in every "catalogue" under "Islam" in thousands of bookstores, libraries, medresas, and mosques throughout the Muslim world. I know this from personal experience with the Faculty of Islamic Studies at the University of Sarajevo in Bosnia-Hercegovina, a great teaching institution that produces dozens of local imams and khatibs, as well as by traveling in the Middle East and central and southeast Asia. Those who try to remove Sufism from Islam do the religion no good. And there is no reason to erect impermeable barriers between the wisdom in Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism. The study of these forms of knowledge is specifically recommended in Qur'an and Hadith. Muhammad said "for knowledge go all the way to China," not "for knowledge lock yourself up in Arabia!" Islam recognizes the value of the "prior revelations" as well as revelations delivered to peoples of which the Arabs of Mecca knew nothing. These issues were settled in Qur'an, and reaffirmed in Islam centuries ago by the great Al-Ghazali and then by the Ottoman caliphs.
02:51 AM on 09/19/2011
For a conventional Muslim, it is Quran and hadith that are the only source to religion. No teachers or other sources are allowed as in sufism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sufism

according to Idries Shah, the Sufi philosophy is universal in nature, its roots predating the rise of Islam and the other modern-day religions, save for perhaps Buddhism and Jainism; likewise, some Muslims consider Sufism outside the sphere of Islam.

Scholars and adherents of Sufism are unanimous in agreeing that Sufism cannot be learned through books. To reach the highest levels of success in Sufism typically requires that the disciple live with and serve the teacher for many, many years.
02:56 AM on 09/19/2011
"These bigoted comments against Sufism "

- How easy it is to use such descriptions. comments based upon facts are not bigoted, it is called the truth. There are reasons that you are persecuted by muslims and ignoring these facts will not change the anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NTT
Fighting rants with facts
04:06 PM on 09/18/2011
Thank you for this important article. Unfortunately, much of the mainstream media ignores the crimes and abysmal human rights abuses taking place daily in Iran. Only occasionally does an individual case catch the fickle attention of our "glorious journalists". This is a reflection of what Ayaan Hirsi Ali called "the racism of low expectations": non-Western people and regimes are not expected to live up to the same standards of civilization and human rights as the Westerners.

In actuality, the mullahs' regime currently ruling Iran is guilty of crimes and severe oppression not just against the Sufis -- but against all religious communities perceived by that demented regime as "apostats". Among those communities are the Baha'i, whose ordinary members are severely persecuted by the mullahs' regime. The leaders of Iran's Baha'i community have been arrested and some were executed.

Both the international Baha'i community ( see http://news.bahai.org/human-rights/iran/the-bahai-question.html) and NGO's such as Amnesty International (see www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/iranian-bahai-leaders-hit-vindictive-sentence-extension-2011-03-31) have protested against these crimes -- but the media has largely (and shamefully) remained indifferent.

It is time for this criminal regime to be unmasked in all its ugliness and outlawed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
11:00 PM on 09/18/2011
The Iranian clerical regime is beginning to devour itself. The hardliners in Qom want to move against the Sufis at the same time as quarreling over power with Ahmadinejad. I think the end of the system is close.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NTT
Fighting rants with facts
10:27 AM on 09/19/2011
I am not surprised that the regime is beginning to devour itself -- that's what often happens in revolutions -- see the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution, Stalin's "purges", the Nazi Night of Long Knives, etc. The road to the betterment of mankind is evolution, not revolution. The latter, while sometimes being triggered by genuine problems, often result in aberation and huge regress, rather than progress.
12:05 PM on 09/18/2011
The light emanating from the hearts of those who are immersed in Sufi Islam does shine on those around them -- Sufis and non-Sufis alike.

Generally speaking, the Sufi Orders are paths of peace, love and enlightenment.

So it pains me when even the Sufi Muslims are painted with the same brush as those currents within Islam that are destructive, such as Wahhabism/Salafism.

Suggested reading on Sufi Islam:

1. "The Elements of Sufism" by Shaykh Fadhlalla Haeri

2. "Sufi Essays" by Seyyed Hossein Nasr

3. "Sufi Path of Love: The Spiritual Teachings of Rumi" by William Chittick [Rumi's poetry is essentially considered a commentary on the Qur`an]

4. "Sufism: A Beginner's Guide" by William Chittick

5. "Witnessing Perfection" by Shaykh Fadhlalla Haeri

6. "Introduction to Sufi Doctrine" by Titus Burckhardt

7. "What is Sufism" by Martin Lings

====================================================================
NOTE: I have posted as "tolerant" before.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
03:03 PM on 09/18/2011
And I, with all due respect, am still-pluralist and insist that reading on Sufism, especially introductory reading, should not be restricted to the works of Rumi, as important and glorious as they are, the commentaries of William Chittick, whom I respect immensely, and the "Traditionalist" doctrines of S.H. Nasr, T. Burckhardt, or M. Lings. It is especially worthwhile, in my view, to examine, early in one's exploration of Sufism, the writings, all in English, of Rabiyya, Bastami, Hallaj, Al-Ghazali, Ibn ul-Arabi, Sa'adi Shirazi, Faridud'din Attar, Hojja Yesevi (there is a study of him in English), and many others aside from Molavi and the "Traditionalists." Among the "Traditionalists" Henri Corbin is certainly as interesting as S.H. Nasr. Hallaj should be read and reread, as of course one should read and reread Ibn ul-Arabi, "the supreme shaykh," "shaykh ul-aqbar," the "doctor maximus" who with Al-Ghazali had an enormous influence on Jewish and Christian mystical thought.
04:22 PM on 09/18/2011
Indeed!

I was concerned about keeping my comments short.

You have in fact shown a great wisdom in correcting me, for which I appreciate you very much.

Many thanks for that.

A couple of years ago, I attempted to read "Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn Al-Arabi's Metaphysics of Imagination" by William Chittick.

It's essentially a translation of Ibn Arabi's works and I found it to be very dense.

So, the beginners might benefit from reading his "Ibn 'Arabi -- Heir to the Prophets" first.

Take care,
tolerant
photo
Jelle NL
Unity in Diversity
10:53 AM on 09/18/2011
Another sad story. -- Imagine the prosperity of Iran, the high standing of Islam, and the growth of the global Muslim community, had the ayatollahs succeeded in combining the Qur'an with Liberalism (democracy, pluralism, human rights ...). Just imagine!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:40 PM on 09/18/2011
Islam and Human rights... Will It Blend?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
09:58 PM on 09/18/2011
Only when Muslim societies go through a Reformation and Age of Reason period oppose religious anti-humanist religious culture the populations are indoctrinated with and decisively defeat the societal controls of the mullahs.
photo
Jelle NL
Unity in Diversity
05:05 AM on 09/21/2011
This is of course the million dollar question. -- You might be interested in the book by Mustafa Akyol: "Islam Without Extremes; A Muslim Case for Liberty" (New York, 2011).
thankgodimanatheist8
The answer to fools is silence
10:40 PM on 09/18/2011
As a native of Iran I totally agree with you. We had many liberal Ayatollahs but they were not political and were pushed aside by the theocrats.

Most people do not know that the right wing Khomeini was not a Grand Ayatollah in 1963 when the US imposed dictator the Shah decided to execute him. He was elevated to the position of Grand Ayatollah and at the same time the CIA (the puppet masters) ordered the Shah not to execute Khomeini.

The Machiavellian CIA backed Khomeini was brought to power when the imperial forces (USA, UK) understood the Shah had to be replaced.

We (the West( do not want Democracy in oil rich areas of the world - corrupt governments are much easier for BP Exxon/Mobile to deal with.

That's why in the past we have supported fundamentalist Islam. Remember the Wahabbi Osama Bin Laden was radicalized by and was a tool of the CIA in the "good Jihad: against the Godless Soviets in Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Scherer
06:10 PM on 09/17/2011
IMHO, America should support the efforts of Sufism around the world.
photo
Damn Damien
Naturally!
03:11 PM on 09/18/2011
IMHO, we should do nothing at all.

If you have been around these blogs lately, you will have realized that there are many who think Islam is wonderful. I suggest we leave the problem for them to solve.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
01:04 AM on 09/19/2011
Only if Sufi Muslims reject Shariah.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen Schwartz
03:30 AM on 09/19/2011
Some Sufis are rigidly Shariah-centric, such as the Qadiris among the Barelvi Muslims in Pakistan. Some Sufis hold only to the religious aspects of Shariah, governing diet, prayer, payment of charity, male circumcision, burial, and calendrical calculations, such as the Rifa'is in the Balkans and Arab countries. Some Sufis ignore Shariah or define it as "outward expressions of faith" that do not lead to enlightenment, like the Albanian Bektashis. Some Sufis ignore Shariah altogether, like the Turkish Alevis. And quite a few learned Muslims refer to "the Shariah of Musa (Moses -- Judaism), the Shariah of Isa (Jesus -- Christianity), and the Shariah of Muhammad (Islam)." It is a complex topic..