Hisham Melhem, Washington Bureau Chief for Al Arabiya, was trying to chase down an interview with former U.S. Senator and new presidential envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell. Pounding all of his channels, friends, networks, Melhem was informed Sunday that "something" might be in the works -- but keep expectations modest.
By Monday morning (yesterday), Melhem was told that he'd likely get Mitchell, and then later in the morning, he received a call telling him that he'd "either be very happy, or made miserable" by what the White House was planning. And then Melhem was asked if he would like to interview President Barack Obama at 5 pm Monday -- but that the bureau would have to keep the interview secret until it happened.
The Al Arabiya Bureau Chief said that was not a problem and that he'd adjust his schedule -- with enormous grin accompanying his response.
Al Arabiya is part of a major Arabic news network, considered second in global coverage to Al Jazeera, which may yet see a nod from the Obama administration down the road -- but seeing that George W. Bush may have joked and/or been serious about bombing an Al Jazeera office in Baghdad, Al Jazeera may still be too much of a leap for the bounding forward new US President.
Obama's exchange with the Al Arabiya journalist (here is transcript), which was only supposed to last about six or seven minutes got extended a bit as press secretary Robert Gibbs saw how well it was going.
This interview is the initial punctuation point in Obama's global public diplomacy. By most accounts, Obama's decision -- shocking to some, refreshing to others -- to talk to the Muslim world in his first formal, sit down press interview hit the ball out of the park.
While Al Arabiya's Bureau Chief did query Obama on which Muslim capital he would first go to in the world (I think it will be Jakarta), Obama's interview -- which Al Arabiya quickly got up on YouTube and also broadcast all around the world through their own networks -- is consistent with Obama-style Facebook political networking and activism. He is using social networks and a hybrid of new media and old media to change the diplomatic game.
It doesn't matter which Muslim capital Obama goes to now because he just reached out to the hearts and minds of Muslims in every capital and frankly, Muslims everywhere -- including inside the United States.
Obama stood by America's alliance with Israel, but said also that Israel and others would have to make sacrifices to achieve stable peace.
He is telegraphing to the Muslim world that the lives of those who live in the Middle East and who are Muslim, wherever they are, matter -- and can't be discounted. Former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton used to decry any effort at talking about the moral equivalency of a death of an innocent in Palestine or in Lebanon when compared to the death or maiming of an Israeli innocent.
Obama talked about the needs and tragedies that have befallen Palestinians and Israelis. And he offered hope to Arab citizens and talked of health care and education -- a vision of the future, that could challenge more rigid groups that have been resisting engagement with the US and Europe and who have been strident in their opposition to Israel.
Barack Obama's first moves have been utterly brilliant. And in his interview, most of it focused on the importance of ending the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. He acknowledged the interconnectedness of the problems in the region, but he noted how important the Middle East Peace process and crisis is.
And I think he was responding personally and sincerely to Prince Turki al-Faisal's warning in the Financial Times this week that the Arab Peace Proposal offered by King Abdullah would not remain on the table indefinitely, and that the window could be closing in the wake of the Gaza crisis. Obama was asking Prince Turki, who previously served as head of Saudi intelligence for more than two decades and as Saudi Ambassador to the US, and the King of Saudi Arabia to hang in there a bit more. Obama's messenging was subtle but clear.
Some will argue that this is not much. That this is optics -- not substantive change.
I totally disagree. Ron Suskind was on target when he reported several years ago that Bush administration officials believed that they could "make their own reality."
Presidents -- in the right period of their presidencies -- can make and shape their own reality. They do so at their peril because someone could eventually demonstrate a gap between the fiction the President is creating and the reality everyone else is grounded in.
But Obama gets to make his own reality at the moment -- and is imposing it -- in a respectful, humble, and powerful way.
His style matters -- just like Bush's swagger did -- and it is this act of humility towards the Muslim world which may animate hope in the nations around the world and in the Middle East specifically.
Everyone will have to adjust now. The Saudis will leave the peace deal on the table. The Israelis have to remake themselves -- even if Netanyahu succeeds Olmert. Hamas will have to find a way to become differently postured -- if not on Israel, then at least on some level of international acceptability with American partners. Arab stakeholders are going to have to snap out of positions shaped more by status quo thinking and inertia that things will never change and get with the Obama program.
What Obama did has provided a new punctuation point in American foreign policy, and it is not "continuous" foreign policy at all. This is a new game and a very impressive new leader.
Time will tell if Obama has inculcated his foreign policy and national security team with the same signals and messages that he brought to this important media encounter.
-- Steve Clemons is Director of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note
|
Obama On Al-Arabiya: First Formal Interview As President With Arab TV Network (VIDEO)
Scroll down for video Barack Obama struck a note of foreign policy confidence Monday night, telling an Arabic news station that al Qaida leaders and...
|
|
|
OBAMA AL-ARABIYA INTERVIEW: FULL TEXT
Here is the full text of President Obama's interview with Al-Arabiya Arab TV Network: INTERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT BY HISHAM MELHEM, AL ARABIYA Map Room...
|
|
Obama's Impressive Beginnings as an Honest Broker in the Middle East: The Psychology of Perspective-taking Where Perspective is Hard to Find
Obama understands the essence of diplomacy: to step out of your own shoes and into the minds of the others around the table, with the goal of achieving your own interests by influencing their minds.
|
|
Obama Used the Word Muslims Want to Hear: Respect
Muslims may seem too eager to seize on Obama's middle name, but Hussein is more than a symbol -- it's a crack in the wall that has kept Islam apart for so long.
|
|
An Open Letter to President Obama on Future Appearances on Arab TV
If an Arab interviewer asks a question you don't like, take off your shoe and throw it at him. That will show everyone in the Arab world that you really understand us.
|
|
"Abu" Obama's Muslim Stimulus Package
The true test of Obama's presidency will not only be the innovative statecraft of its regional diplomacy, but also his ability to mobilize a comprehensive initiative to lift the Arab world out of its economic and social poverty.
|
|
Why Did Obama Choose Al-Arabiya for His First Major Interview?
Obama's remarks to al-Arabiya showed a willingness to engage, to listen, and to move toward a dialogue where Arabs are spoken to not as victims or villains, but as partners.
|
|
Obama's Interview with Al Arabiya: New Language, New Ideas, and a New Approach
In what is a critically important exchange, Obama reveals that he is well aware that unsuccessful intellectual frameworks can end up producing bad policy approaches.
|
Countdown to a glorious 100 days has already begun.
The Financial Times has an excellent editorial today on the matter.
Bush was the first president to ever say “Palestine” and officially endorse a state. Cheney said that “a Palestinian state is long overdue” and Condi Rice stated that there isn’t a more noble legacy for America than bringing about a Palestinian state. These were the right words, but actions speak louder.
What about language? Obama spoke about the need to listen. But has never shown an interest in listening to Arabs. In his trip Obama's 45 minutes in Palestine where matched with 72 hours in Israel! Obama did not listen to Palestinians under occupation. He did not visit any of the over 600 checkpoints that litter the West Bank and see what the Palestinians must confront everyday. Nor did he visit any Arab-Israeli town and as an African-American speak to Arabs in Israel of a shared experience of discrimination. Thorough out his campaign the “hope” candidate never once visited a Arab or Muslim community center and rebuked the invitation to sit down with community leaders.
Obama stated that Israel’s security is “paramount”. That means Israeli “security” must always trump Palestinian rights, because the Israelis are “paramount” in the mind of Obama over the Palestinians. That is why Obama will not ask Israel to remove one checkpoint because Israel says they provide security for settlers.
Whatever Obama might say will be moot as the Palestinians suffer and America expresses unqualified support for Israel.
Why is that part of the Saudi plan always forgotten?
Or perhaps Obama and his communications team are smart enough to see that Al-Jazeera is to the Muslim world what Fox News is to the United States: so much sensationalism and so little substance that it's nearly impossible for a non-ideologue to take seriously.
Excellent choice by President Obama.
Whatever you think of Al Jazeera, it's good to at least have BOTH sides of the sorry. To look at things through Arab eyes and not just Israeli or American eyes. Give me both biased sides of the story and everything else in between so I can weigh it all up and make up my mind.
Speaking of which - Israel has chosen to censor the full nature, reality and human cost of the current Israel/Gaza conflict. Al Jazeera are reporting from inside Gaza. They're providing 24-hour coverage of the Israeli offensive in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis it has triggered.
Profile: Al-Arabiya TV
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3236654.stm
A voice of moderation helps transform Arab media
http://iht.com/articles/2008/01/04/africa/profile.php
Al-Jazeera becomes the face of the frontline
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/35017196-e19c-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html
Al Jazeera Bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_bombing_memo#References
In a society where people get up each day to open their business, farm, lecture or research, what-ever the occupation, there can be less tolerance of extreme behavior. In much the same way as America has mobilized it's population to make change, so too can a similar result be fashioned in the middle east. Where is the [potentially massive] social support from Egypt and Jordan [even Israel and America]? A 'New Deal' for Gaza and the West Bank that wasn't bankrolled by terrorism would go a long way...
The sooner EVERYONE [and I do mean Jordan, Egypt, America, Israel and the other players in the region] realizes this, the better -
If you look at the charter of Hamas, it is the destruction of Israel. In this, they should remain hopeless.
The palestinians were free to run Gaza as they saw fit. As soon as the Jews left Gaza, the rocket attacks began. Then Israel shut down fuel and electric supplies and attacted terrorist involved in rocket launchings. Of course, most people call that "collective punishment" as though the people of Gaza have no control over whom they elect.
To all those commenters indignantly asking how this sort of thing solves the problems of the Middle East, I can only say, get real, even in the best scenario it's not exactly going to happen overnight. The point is, this was our opening move, and it was a very good one.
}}}}
Had they followed your advice in the UK, there would have been no Northern Ireland peace agreement.
{{{{{
Actually, they DID follow my advice in the UK..
Or, more accurately, my advice is based on exactly what the SAS and MI6 did to the IRA. Thru a brutal campaign of assassinations and infiltrations, the Brits brought the IRA to the precipice of extinction and gave them a choice..
Negotiate or perish...
The IRA chose wisely...
}}}}
And to address another of your points, there are plenty of alternative definitions of terrorism, and no consensus on what it actually is. I'm sure you have a handy definition that will conveniently exclude the US and Israel. However, it is fairly obvious that the most "terror-fied" of the parties in the Arab-Israeli conflict is the Palestinians.
{{{{
Actually, my definition is borne of nearly a quarter century in the field..
And while you are correct that there are many definitions out there, they are all subjective and depend on the prejudices and bigotry of the person applying the term. Hence, they are factually innaccurate and utterly meaningless..
My definition is set, definitive and, above all else, objective. It doesn't allow itself to be "spun" or twisted subjectively just so it can be applied to whoever pisses off the applier at any given moment...
Michale......
If so, they're not getting their money's worth.
Mr. Karsh is head of Mediterranean Studies at King's College, University of London, and the author most recently of "Islamic Imperialism: A History" (Yale). This article appears in the May issue of
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/
To imply that a convert to Judism is not a real Jew (we hear that so often) is redicules. Evry Muslim is a descendant of converts (willingly or by the sword). Every Christian is a convert or descendant of converts.
Actually, Jews were there first. The Roman dispersed many. But there has always been a Jewish presence in the land that became known as Palestine. For most of the time, they were the majority in Jerusalem.
When you talk about "Peace, Not Apartheid", I suggest that you look at how non-Muslims fare in Muslim countries.
}}}}
His conversation with the Muslim world today cost no American dollars, sacrificed no American lives, compromised no American ideals and antagonized no American alies yet may have done more to make americans safe and foster democracy and peace in the middle east in one hour than the whole eight years of the Bush tradgedy.
{{{{{
That was very eloquent... Kudos.
But my question is this.
Will it have any effect on the likes of HAMAS and Hezbollah et al??
I seriously doubt it.
Michale.....
Obama's opinion of and attitude towards HAMAS is crystal clear..
Plus there is the Foreign Policy Agenda that is posted to whitehouse.gov...
No, I think that those Anti-Israel types better get used to the fact that there will be no substantial change in the US policy towards Israel..
Michale....
Tell us again how we deal with a nation that wants to totally destroy Israel?
I think Obama needs to seriously, and honestly tackle the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Resolving this once and for all will eliminate a significant source of support for Iran in the region.
That said, the best thing to do with Iran is to engage it. It is an important player in the region. And I do think that both countries have a lot to apologize to each other for.
Nukes that the world is unwilling to stop Iran from getting.
Nukes that threaten not only Israel but most of the Arab world.