Steve Clemons

Steve Clemons

Posted October 15, 2008 | 06:44 PM (EST)

Chuck Hagel Will Help Obama Find his "Inner Nixon"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

hagel hand clemons.jpgOne of these days, I'm going to post a long roster of foreign policy speeches and other writing by Senator Chuck Hagel. I need to check in with Arianna Huffington about setting up a journal of record here for "Hagelism" since I believe that we as a nation are going to be repeatedly coming back to his strategically sensible framework for thinking through national security and international political and policy challenges.

Slowly, I've been weaseling out of America's national security bureaucracy a Hagel letter here and there that was addressed to Condi Rice or President Bush or some other significant player in the incumbent administration who ether contributed to or didn't stop the swift erosion of America's national security portfolio.

Hagel has been a trooper trying to help the Bush administration see the dangers ahead. He has been writing these thoughtful, prescient letters for years -- and thus far, only a couple have seen the light of day.

Essentially, Chuck Hagel has reinforced over and over again that America needs to balance between stewardship of its core interests on the one hand, and on the other help to responsibly expand when it can prosperity, stability, democratic norms and self-determination.

He is the "no false choice" guy. He doesn't burn bridges. He believes in principled, englightened American engagement in global affairs. He doesn't want to see the US national security bureaucracy in a false standoff between Israel's security interests and the Arab Middle East's longer term objectives of stability and prosperity -- and knows that America must not choose one over the other.

Hagel has opposed false trade-offs between embracing Eastern European nations (and even helping to create new ones) and Russia's serious national priorities. He gets how transnational threats are challenging the fabric of states -- not just networked, transnational terrorism but also refugee, disease, poverty and climate change crises.

Hagel believes in game-changing strategies with Iran. I think he probably thinks along the same lines when it comes to Syria and possibly even Cuba. To some degree, putting Syria on a new track robs Iran of some running room in much the same way that opening the spigots of engagement with Cuba rob Hugo Chavez of maneuvering room in Latin America.

Hagel is a hard-edged negotiator who has a vision of alternative equilibriums and is not an appeaser of global (or Senate) thugs. Like few others in the Senate -- with perhaps Biden, Dodd, Feingold, Lugar, and formerly Lincoln Chafee as excepetions -- Hagel knows that diplomacy is the more important force that must be deployed in such a way that process generates previously concealed or obscure openings and opportunities.

I have spoken to Senator Hagel on several occasions and believe that he thinks America must not wall itself off from enemies but must engage, wrestle with, intimidate, and seduce them. This, Hagel feels, may be the only method America has at its disposal to leap frog out of the quagmire it is in today into a new equilibrium, establishing a redrawn "deal" with other global stakeholders.

The world is at a historical pivot point -- and America is too slowly realizing that inertia and incrementalism are keeping it from shaking up things and getting ahead of events in a new and constructive way. America's foreign policy today is ad hoc, reactive -- with little regard to what we hope the world will look like and what our place in world affairs will be decades from now.

At heart, Hagel is an evolved, internationally progressive Richard Nixon -- and I wish that he had found himself debating either Barack Obama or John McCain tonight. But he won't be president -- at least not this round -- but he is the right guy to be Secretary of State in the next administration.

I think Obama will win on November 4th -- but I'm not offering this as an endorsement. It's just where very strong winds are blowing -- and to a certain degree, strikingly large macro factors have given Obama a tail wind that is covering up both the strengths and weaknesses of candidate Obama. Unless another large exogenous hit bursts on the American political scene, circumstances will push Barack Obama strongly forward into 1600 Pennsylvania.

But whether or not Obama wins the White House, Chuck Hagel would be the right Secretary of State for either McCain or Obama. McCain's flirtation with an expansive, neoconservative agenda has been terrible for his campaign and has frightened Americans and much of the world with its calloused hubris.

I think that there are other good candidates to be chief diplomat -- including Senator John Kerry who seems to want a post of major import in the next administration and yes, even Richard Holbrooke who has it in his DNA to play that role one day.

But when Senator Obama chose Joe Biden to be his vice presidential choice, to some degree that lessened the near term need (they would be ideal for round two appointments) for either Holbrooke who is a well-seasoned, progressively focused arm-twister (like no other in international affairs) and for John Kerry who basically looks a lot like Biden in his foreign policy views.

But Hagel is Nixon -- more so than any of the candidates who ran for office -- more than Obama, Biden, Dodd, Huckabee, Brownback, McCain, Romney, Edwards, Clinton, Tancredo, Paul -- even Bill Richardson.

And this next administration needs a 21st century Nixonian hand who thinks naturally in those terms and sees the third and fourth and fifth dimension to problems -- who understands that interests are not only national but international in impact and consequence and who understands that the wall separating economics and national security is false and should figure into Obama's next "World Without Walls" speech.

Senator Hagel has been in Asia the last several days -- visiting Japan, China, and South Korea -- getting a sense of the strategic situation surrounding the seeming accomplishments of Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill in getting North Korea to agree again to invasive nuclear program inspections and further disabling its nuclear capacity in exchange for the US dropping it from the state sponsors of terror list.

Hagel is also taking stock of what China's and Japan's next moves in the global economy might look like -- and how they are viewing America's situation after much of the world is fuming at America for exporting poisoned financial products that virally spread leveling some of the world's largest economic firms and nations.

On the home front, Hagel's wife, Lilibet, will be watching the presidential debates tonight with Michelle Obama. Lilibet Hagel has endorsed Barack Obama for president, and Chuck Hagel has remained quiet for the time being.

Rumors are swirling that Chuck Hagel -- and Colin Powell -- may both endorse Barack Obama in the days shortly after this debate. I have no idea if that is true -- and to some degree it doesn't matter.

In the case of Powell -- he is a sensible national security realist and cautious general who Obama (if he wins) should solicit advice from frequently.

But at the State Department, Chuck Hagel is the right guy to work with Barack Obama and Joe Biden in helping to move a mostly liberal administration towards a Nixonian direction that may feel alien and uncomfortable.

This is essentially what Bill Clinton did when he came into office and found despite his lack of interest in foreign policy (then) that Yeltsin's Russia was imploding. Clinton got on the phone with Nixon and began a set of encounters and tutorials that helped Clinton manage the Russia challenge -- and which helped contribute to the national rehabilitation of Richard Nixon in the eyes of many.

Many of Senator and possibly President Obama's close retainers and acolytes may cringe at the thought of channeling Richard Nixon -- but they will need his approach to global affairs in a time marked by the globally perceived decline of American moral, military and economic leadership.

Senator Chuck Hagel is trusted around the world, respected -- and not for being nice -- but rather for being straightforward with friends and rivals about the poorly understood fact that there are nearly always opportunities in persistent diplomacy and statecraft.

And most importantly, Chuck Hagel is the right guy to help an Obama administration embrace its "inner Nixon."

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note

One of these days, I'm going to post a long roster of foreign policy speeches and other writing by Senator Chuck Hagel. I need to check in with Arianna Huffington about setting up a journal of record...
One of these days, I'm going to post a long roster of foreign policy speeches and other writing by Senator Chuck Hagel. I need to check in with Arianna Huffington about setting up a journal of record...
 
Comments
31
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

i understand why obama himself may not want to travel this road,however,anytime an obama surrogate is asked to speak about obams foreign policy credentials or any war related issues,they should point out every single time,with a megaphone,the fact that at last check overseas members of the military have donated to obamas campaign at a rate of six to one as opposed to mccain.let me repeat-OVERSEAS MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY HAVE DONATED TO BARACK OBAMA AT A RATE OF SIX TO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this fact,along with the colin powell endorsement ought to wrap up this issue with a huge bow on it for obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 10/22/2008

How about his inner Hagel, which may be greater than any inner Nixon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 10/17/2008

I too am an Obama supporter who LOVES Chuck Hagel. I disagree with him on some issues, but I think he has true integrity and true patriotism - not the jingoism of Fox News, but the kind of patriotism where you love your country honestly and deeply enough to recommend things that might make you unpopular.

Hagel and Obama seem to have a good relationship, and I think that should Obama get elected, Hagel would be an excellent fit for his administration. (Although I suspect Bill Richardson might already have Sec of State locked up)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 10/17/2008

I have thought for months now that Hagel will be the next Secretary of Defense due to his history and respect from the military. In my opinion, Defense is a better fit for Hagel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 10/17/2008
photo

I would like Sen Hagel to lead his party as Minority Leader in the post-partisan atmosphere of the Obama admin.. Someone who will accept a handshake and work across the aisle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 10/16/2008

There is another, very natural spot for Hagel - National Security Advisor! All of his diplomatic and military experience would be brought to bear. I think he would be extraordinary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 10/16/2008

I see Hagel as either Sec of State or Sec of Defense. You make a good case for Sec of State, but I always pictured Sec of Defense. Hagel has the military background, and reasoned judgment for a SecDef position. But he also brings a *very* conservative record that I feel would be of great benefit to weed out wasteful DoD spending. He's very supportive of the troops and military, so he'll make sure they are well funded, but to his core he's conservative and will fight any wasteful or unneeded spending.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 10/16/2008
photo

I disagree that Hagel and Powell endorsements would not matter. It doesn't seem that Obama and Biden now need their endorsements to win the election. But endorsements from credible and respected voices from the opposition are very valuable when it comes to any administration's ability to govern. And Obama and Biden will very much have to govern from the center. McCain and Palin, and the Rovian right, are creating the kind of permanent and hostile opposition that Bill Clinton had to face. That kind of scorched earth opposition can seriously impede productive government work. More than anything, we need a functional government over the next four to eight years. So, yes, Hagel's and Powell's endorsements are indeed important, if not vital.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 10/16/2008

I say Sen Hagel would make a GREAT Secretary of Defense (w/Gen Clark Sec of the Army)!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 10/16/2008

I too think Chuck Hagel might be an excellent choice. Obama mentioned him tonight as one of the people he goes to for advice, so I think you've made a good call. However, having lived through the Nixon years, I find the Nixon comparison very disturbing. I have listened to him on C-Span and didn't get that at all. Looking into him will be my next project. Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 AM on 10/16/2008

Obama should not appoint Hagel as Secretary of State, but as Secretary of Defense. With the DOD putting forth ridiculous budget requests, and the pressing need for a sane exit from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Hagel would be able to navigate Congress better than anyone. He knows where all the Republican bodies are buried and Democrats appreciate his logical approach to matters, and he would have no control over social issues.

I'm betting Obama will appoint Daschle as his Secretary of State.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 10/16/2008

Daschle will likely be Chief of Staff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 10/16/2008

I hope Obama does ask Hagel to join his administration if/when he wins. As one of Senator Hagel's constituents I've always been delighted (unlike many of his constituents in Nebraska) that he consistently stands up with wisdom and foresight to the Bush administrations cowboy foreign policy. He would be an excellent pick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 10/16/2008
- XME I'm a Fan of XME permalink
photo

I'm an independent voter, and am fed up with extreme partisanship where people think that someone is "evil" JUST because they are in one party or the other. All that leads to is gridlock, demonization of people without an ability to make unbiased judgements, and hate. Personally, I think that Hagel would be great in an Obama administration. After 8 years of Bush, we desperately need an administration that doesn't disregard people and their opinions and views JUST because they're not in the same party.

I'm sick of turning on the TV every night just to hear everyone in Washington blaming everyone in the OTHER party for nothing getting done. You just can't realistically blame things, such as our economy tanking on ONE party when it's the results of MANY things that have occurred since around 1990. As Barack Obama wisely said...ENOUGH.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 10/16/2008

His "inner Nixon?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 10/16/2008

Great post and absolutely right on. Chuck Hagel is not the typical politician...he is a true American patriot. I have no doubt that there is a place for Hagel in an Obama Administration. Obama is too intelligent not to tap Hagel's experience and wisdom.

I hope the rumors of Hagel and Powell endorsements for Obama are true. It would be a great boost in the push to election day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 AM on 10/16/2008

hagel has some great attributes...but do NOT consider him..without looking at his very conservative (bush)..voting record on domestic issues.... he could be a trojan horse...not saying IS...just saying..look deeper...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 10/16/2008

This is all fine and good, but what is taking them so long?
So many rats have deserted the sinking ship.
Any support you show for Obama now is a day late and a dollar short.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 10/15/2008
- XME I'm a Fan of XME permalink
photo

He's always been on Obama's side when it comes to Iraq, though he's pretty conservative otherwise. And it's only too late to back Obama after November 4th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 10/16/2008

My hope is that they are timing their endorsements to help Obama win a couple of news cycles post-debate. I'd expect one of not both endorsements just before, during, or just after the weekend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 AM on 10/16/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect