More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steve Clemons

Steve Clemons

Posted: December 17, 2010 04:32 PM

bob-corker-r-tn.jpg

The New START Treaty isn't just about a bilateral arrangement with Russians to keep their and our nuclear warheads under tight management. It is really about momentum in reversing the dramatic erosion of controls on a whole range of WMD materials.

If the US does not move START forward and validate so much of the progress that the Nunn-Lugar program has made in decommissioning nukes and getting dangerous materials under control, then those trigger devices and uranium and other paraphernalia become vulnerable to "hijacking" by non-state interests. Very dangerous.

And yet US Senator Bob Corker who had signed on to support START -- to put America's safety at the forefront of his and his constituency's concerns -- is now saying that he's going to drop out and risk putting nukes out into the world untethered and subject to corruption and penetration by terrorist groups because he wants to make sure that US military men and women -- who are gay and serving -- have to continue to lie and deceive about their status.

His price for securing America's national security: bigotry.

Bad move, Senator Corker.

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note. Clemons can be followed on Twitter @SCClemons

 

Follow Steve Clemons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SCClemons

 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
LeftCoastEng
Obsessed with failed trade
05:16 PM on 12/19/2010
I'm not surprised. This is the same guy who didn't want to bail-out the auto companies if the American workers would make too much money.
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
01:55 PM on 12/19/2010
How much industry in Tennessee is tied to the Defence budget?

Always look for the money. Senatorial ethics are frangible.
11:21 AM on 12/19/2010
Precisely how will the START treaty prevent "...putting nukes out into the world untethered and subject to corruption and penetration by terrorist groups ..." that all of the signatories will NOT do with or without the treaty?

If START is the only thing between terrorists and nukes we are already screwed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dixdarlin
03:29 PM on 12/18/2010
Wonder if this is being carried in the Memphis, or any Tenn. papers?
photo
Blak
Yes..I know my Micro-bio is empty.
02:17 AM on 12/19/2010
I highly doubt if it matters. These are folks who know they will be re-elected regardless of what they say or do.
hopeisalive
Old enough to know better, but young enough to try
08:39 AM on 12/18/2010
Their belief that the last election meant that they should be the determiners of everything is their myth. What the American people want, in my mind, is a movement forward out of the hole we are in. A movement towards working together using both sides ideas. This kind of thinking gets rattled when basic concepts like nuclear safety gets bartered against DADT which most Americans believe should be repealed. Nothing is for sure yet, but the Party of No seems to be still in denial.
photo
Buckeye54
...the One your mom warned you about!
11:31 AM on 12/18/2010
F & F. If the Republicans look at polls at all, they obviously don't know how to read them.

But as for START, the dimmest bulb in the collection should know we are much more secure as a country when we and the Russians are abiding by treaties that monitor our nuclear weapons and materials. To vote otherwise degrades our national security.

As for DADT, this doesn't even take a poll, since it is about basic human rights, nothing else. The fact that the majority of Americans want DADT repealed now is icing on the cake.

I am afraid that for most Republicans the idea of giving President Obama any legislative victories is more abhorrent than doing what is morally right. Too many Republicans lack the moral character and integrity to do the right thing.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:51 AM on 12/19/2010
Don't forget that the GOP isn't above whipping up a revival of the old "Red Scare."  For many years, it was the glue that held the GOP together.
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
08:02 AM on 12/18/2010
I don't question their integrity because there's nothing to question. Clearly, Bob Corker and his ilk in the Republican party gave up integrity for Lent many years back, and missed it so little that they decided not to reclaim it.

Mike
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgateman
10:17 AM on 12/18/2010
If only all the mega-church fer jebus maroons would give up faux for Lent and get informed.... nah, never mind.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:52 AM on 12/19/2010
The silly society wants to buy their way into heaven while trying to send others to Hell.
04:26 AM on 12/18/2010
To suggest policy regarding nuclear weapons is related to DADT is a hard sell.
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
12:15 PM on 12/18/2010
First it was Christmas as the excuse..now this.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
10:38 PM on 12/17/2010
I also am a constituent of Corker. His racist campaign against his opponent Harold Ford ("Harold, call me!") was an egregious act of racism and this flip-flopping stance on the Dream Act is consistent with his image. He is an embarrassment to Tennessee.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ron071
11:00 PM on 12/17/2010
Jdaddy1951 is correct, Corker IS " an embarrassment to Tenn " and to decent people everywhere.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Jdaddy1951
11:46 PM on 12/17/2010
Yeah. What Ron said.
02:32 AM on 12/18/2010
The ad I looked up was incredibly racist, but there's one nagging thing I can't quite wrap my head around.

From every picture of Ford I can find, the man looks white. ._.;;
12:35 PM on 12/18/2010
So it's OK to smear him because he looks White? I doubt that's the only nagging thing floating around your head.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
09:25 PM on 12/17/2010
The premise of the article is that if the START treaty is not ratified by the senate, then the Russians will start to sell their nukes??

But if we & the Russians sign a piece of paper, then the Russians will not sell their nukes.
here's to the rainbows and unicorns...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ron071
11:02 PM on 12/17/2010
FYI   DUSAA-1775, The record shows that the Russians to abide by the treaties they sign on nuclear matters.  Check the record BEFORE going off on a rant.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
08:29 AM on 12/18/2010
...' The record shows that the Russians to abide by the treaties they sign on nuclear matters. ...'
I do not know when you were educated. You may well have been squeezed through the new modern era when skills such as reading and comprehension were not subjects that students were taught.

My ' rant' consisted of two sentences. After struggling to digest the words, you gave up the futile effort and just make up the issue that I said the Russians do not abide by the treaties they sign.
09:13 PM on 12/21/2010
The whole nuclear thing is both bigger than it looks, and smaller. Everyone with half a brain knows, objectively, that having let the nuclear genie out of the bottle has created the single greatest potential threat to human survival of any of the idiocy directly attributable to the species. On the other hand, this very same population of persons with at least half a brain is unanimous in knowing, on at least some level, that nuclear weaponry has obsoleted itself.

Obama completely sold out on money issues to the right in the "Bush tax cut" fiasco. Their levers, at least if one is willing to attribute even relatively "pure motives" to Obama, were New Start, DADT, and DREAM.

The frosting that Obama decided to put on the celebratory cake of The Republic Party was DREAM.

How does this whole thing not compute as having been an episode of atrociously bad deal making on the part of The White House?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rebt
a liberal in the bible belt. Oh the humanity.
06:48 PM on 12/17/2010
I am a constituent of Corker's. He is an embarrassment for our state and community.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ron071
11:02 PM on 12/17/2010
rebt, I hope your voting conscience is clear.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
12:09 AM on 12/19/2010
Please, ron701, "constituent" is not the same as "voted for". I certainly didn't vote for Corker, yet I am also his constituent. Neither of us are under any illusions, however, that he will have anything close to the interests of his state at his heart.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
06:25 PM on 12/17/2010
First, Bob Corker uses a racist ad to get elected, now this.
05:23 PM on 12/17/2010
The Republicans don't want to give Obama and the Democrats a win on both of these bills. They only want one. In my opinion START is vastly more important to President Obama because, if he doesn't get it passed, it makes him look ineffectual and weak to our allies.

DADT also is important to the President because of satisfying a segment of his base. But defeat of it is not going to damage him like defeat of START will.

Senator Corker is probably just speaking the truth for most Republicans.
07:04 PM on 12/17/2010
I think you are dead wrong on this. Losing START makes it clear that the Senate has gone nuts which plays into the narrative that the Republicans have become dangerous. That's possibly good for Obama internationally. But no one domestically cares about START. Liberals need a win to give Obama the room to compromise in 2011-2. Without a win, liberals are going to wonder why Obama is worth working for.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
12:11 AM on 12/19/2010
Not the ones who've been around a while. Too many Republican elder statesmen have come out and flat out said that this is way too important to use as a political football. If this current class of Rs go to town on this, it's going to get uglier than even I figured.