Opinions are mixed on whether Timothy Geithner will hold his position as Secretary of the Treasury much longer. While I have always liked Geithner personally (he's an old Asia hand), his leadership in the eyes of many is uncompelling.
The recent revelations that staff members of his at the New York Fed advised AIG to hide material matters from regulators may be the final trigger leading to his departure.
Obama needs to change up his economic team anyway. The President took the advice and counsel of Robert Rubin, Lawrence Summers, Timothy Geithner, and Ben Bernanke and resuscitated Wall Street by pumping hundreds of billions of tax dollars as guarantees and bailouts into the financial sector.
We now have a high stock market but disturbingly job openings today are 50% lower than in 2007. Obama has said that 2010 is going to be a year of focusing on job creation and more serious infrastructure investment.
In my view, jobs and national infrastructure should have been the President's priorities in 2009 -- when he actually had the mandate and financial resources to make deep job-creating infrastructure investments that recurring returns to the American economy and workers over the next generation. But Obama is late to the cause, and future results are in doubt.
To convince American voters and working families he is serious about job creation and more sensible economic policies than he has thus far pursued, he can't keep Lawrence Summers, Romer, Geithner, and the overwhelmingly neoliberal members of his White House econ team.
Obama can't expect us to believe that the same team members that he has had working out global macroeconomic deals are the same who can focus on microeconomic issues in specific industries and on the nation's pathetic jobs portfolio. Leo Hindery throws out some ideas on Huffington Post today on how to get the jobs machine going again, but I can't imagine Obama's current team seriously pursuing the Hindery action plan.
Jared Bernstein, chief economist to Vice President Joe Biden, is practically the only one with any serious background in infrastructure and jobs-focused economic policy.
So Obama needs to change the team.
I've been asking people to give some thought to who should run the Department of Treasury if and after Timothy Geithner departs. I've asked a wide variety of people privately -- from the heavy labor to financial to high tech sectors -- to share with me (off the record) who should take the helm of America's economic policy shop.
The suggestions are quite varied, but I wanted to open up the discussion more publicly at The Washington Note and at Huffington Post.
Knee jerk, silly answers can always be fun -- but they aren't serious.
We need someone who can think carefully about changing the economic policy course of the country, who is as economist James K. Galbraith just shared with me "incorruptible", and who can run a big government operation, and instill national and global confidence in his or her leadership.
I have some good and interesting names -- but I'd like to hear from all of you.
Who should be America's next Treasury Secretary?
-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note. Clemons can be followed on Twitter @SCClemons
Follow Steve Clemons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SCClemons
Perhaps this has been answered elsewhere on the Huffington Post?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/the-economist-the-obama-a_n_355022.html
John D. Geanakoplos and Susan P. Koniak seem to have been proven right in their approaches.
Check it out.
JOSEPH STIGLITZ, nobel laureate
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/kill-wall-street-bonuses-or-tax-%27em-to-death-mit%27s-simon-johnson-says-402210.html?tickers=XLF,JPM,GS,BAC,C,MS,WFC
and
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/we-need-bank-reform-now-or-another-crisis-is-inevitable-simon-johnson-says-402563.html?tickers=xlf,skf,gs,c,spy,dia,bac
Until Obama cleans house (the White House, that is) of Summers, Geithner, and anyone else who cannot stand independent of the Wall Street houses, they will drag him down.
I would like to see Volker in some capacity, but with his age, maybe it is not in the cards.
Until he sheds the Wall St. boys, Main St. will never be on his side, again. Elizabeth Warren would be good.
Get rid of the Clintonistas and make the Republicans approve the rest of his nominations.
Nobody with political acumen will ever nominate Spitzer to secretary of treasury. An attempt at such nomination will die a natural death in the Senate. Spitzer can be appointed in a position that does not require senate confirmation because he is a political liability.
Prof. Warren has academic credentials for secretary of treasure but lacked proven track record of accomplishment and experience in technocratic public service. Has she ever served at mid-level position in the treasury department, World Bank, IMF etc? What national economic crisis has she ever managed, resolved, or participated?
Prof Warren has spent major part of her adult career in academia with excellence. However, being a treasury secretary is more complex and complicated and requires unique type of experience. Furthermore, she does not share President Obama’s political and economic philosophies. Therefore, a mismatch will never work.
In the 90’s there were national economic crisis in places like Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand and Russia. Some of the names being bandied around to replace Secretary Tim Geithner, how many of them have helped resolve national economic crisis in their resume. Mouthing populist economic propaganda or Ivory Tower professorial credentials is not secretary of treasury make in the complex US economy.
However, if I'm not called to serve, I nominate Robert Reich. Although Elliot Spitzer would be an interesting choice if for no other reason than the heartburn it would cause for the ones who engineered his demise.
Oh how sweet that would be.
and i dont know if elizabeth warren is qualified for that job in particular,but they need to find something meaningful for her in the administration,because she is one of a small handful of people involved in finance who i actually trust and actually comprehend.if they could somehow make her the face of their economic recovery,it could do wonders.
fair or not,when i see-and i have to believe most americans as well-geithner or christine rohmer on tv attempting to explain why things really arent so bad,i have a tough time buying it.and again,fair or not,appearances matter,even when it comes to deficit ceilings and stimulus packages....