iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steve Cobble

Steve Cobble

Posted: January 21, 2010 11:27 AM

People = Corporations? Not.

What's Your Reaction:

We all know that people are not the same as corporations.

The Roberts Court does not. It's a bad day for democracy.

Go to www.freespeechforpeople.org if you want to fight back. There's a short video to share, featuring Congresswoman Donna Edwards and Law Professor Jamin Raskin, and there's more information on what this ruling means to real people.

The U.S. Supreme Court this morning took a big step away from the Constitution, away from one-person, one-vote, away from precedent, away from the original intent of the First Amendment, away from free speech for people.

How? By deciding that corporate speech is the equivalent of individual speech.
This is a horrible decision. It is horrible for the political system -- our elections will now be even more flooded by big corporate money. It is horrible for the legal system -- the right wing on the Court has once again shown, as they did in Bush v. Gore less than a decade ago, that it will not allow legal niceties to stand in the way of naked political grabs. It is horrible for progressives -- we will now have to spend even more of our time during the coming years trying to fend off the overwhelming power of big corporate money on our politics.

As he so often does, Justice Stevens called out the 5-4 majority for their rash and unjust act:

"The Court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions across the Nation. The path it has taken to reach this outcome will, I fear, do damage to this institution."

Or: "It is gutting campaign finance laws across the country, as the Court, does today, that will be destabilizing."

Constitutional law professor and Maryland State Senator Jamin Raskin puts it this way on our web site: "This is a moment of high danger for democracy so we must act quickly to spell out in the Constitution what the people have always understood: that corporations do not enjoy the political and free speech rights that belong to the people of the United States."'

And U.S. Representative Donna Edwards (D, MD-4), a long-time campaign finance reform activist before winning election to Congress in 2008, suggests that given this unfair decision by the Court, for us to restore the First Amendment to its original meaning--protecting free speech for people -- may require us to fight for a Constitutional Amendment.

We have to fight back, and various grassroots organizations have been trying to get ready for what we expected to be an awful, unfair decision. Working with Voter Action, Public Citizen, and the Center for Corporate Policy, a small group of us will be pushing back against this decision, in particular the idea that free speech for people means unlimited spending for corporations. If you want to help us, go to www.freespeechforpeople.org to join our effort.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:05 PM on 01/21/2010
People band together in groups to promote or protect various causes and with the rise in government intervention one would expect that to continue. They should have the right to protect themselves by weighing in on the issues that impact them. This would include population control groups, environmental groups, unions, teachers, and, yes, corporations.

As voters we need to see advertising...in all forms...for what it is and apply some thought to it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdlawyer2
04:33 PM on 01/21/2010
Another constitutional argument propounded (by one of my conservative partners) is that corporations, even if they do not have individual free speech rights, have the right to a unified voice (that of its shareholders) as a consequence of freedom of assembly. Individuals have the right to peaceably assemble and speak as a group. His argument is that a corporation is just a group of assembled individuals entitled to a unified voice. A corporate thus has a voice, as would a homeowner's assoication, a chamber of commerce, a civic league, a political party, etc.
06:14 PM on 01/21/2010
the shareholders ALREADY VOTE!!

this ruling would give those shareholders a DOUBLE VOICE in politics

and we DESTROYED ENGLAND 200 years ago because "LANDOWNERS" got more a voice than anyone else.

so why is the AMERICAN Supreme Court turning American back into what ENGLAND wanted the Colonies to be like 200 years ago?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdlawyer2
07:47 PM on 01/21/2010
So since I vote, I'm double dipping if the Amercian Health Lawyers Association, the United Way, the Baltimore Chamber of Commerce, the Baltimore Museum of Art, the Boy Scouts, the Greater Baltimore Committee or any of the other numerous organizations of which I am a member, or with which I am associated, makes any political or legislative commentary? I don't agree with the today's ruling, but I dare say, I certainly don't agree with the logic (or lack thereof) in your prior comment. Also, drop the "CAPS", they serve no purpose and impugn your credibilty.
photo
illinoisan
We don't need no stinking badges
04:03 PM on 01/21/2010
Make corps wait until they're 18 years old before they can enter into contracts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MalleusMaleficarum
Global nomad.
03:04 PM on 01/21/2010
Following swiftly on the heels of Brown's victory in MA - corporations will flood the RNC and Republican candidates with tons of money. Steve Cobble is right. It is time to take the grass roots to the streets and polling places of America.
03:02 PM on 01/21/2010
Congress bestowed on corporations the status of "person." The SCOTUS used the legal definition of person and interpreted the Bill of Rights with the legal definition in mind.

The solution to this is to have Congress redefine the corporation, in which case corporations would not be protected by the Bill of Rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
03:11 PM on 01/21/2010
By now it'd probably take a Constitutional Convention.... We should impeach the nine....
03:27 PM on 01/21/2010
We also tax corporations based on their status as a person.
01:46 PM on 01/21/2010
The Supreme Court has given us Government of the Corporation, by the Corporation, for the Corporation.
01:43 PM on 01/21/2010
At the same time Obama decides to finally get 'populist', the Supreme Court destroys the system's integrity. Not that we don't have two mainstream corporate sponsored parties now, but it will get much worse.
Maybe only individuals can be guilty of corruption, not corporations.
I just hope the court has 'friendly' Fascizm in mind.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
01:33 PM on 01/21/2010
Isn't the New York Times a corporation? Maybe we should apply these campaign restrictions to them.
02:36 PM on 01/21/2010
So is Faux News. They have been celebrating Brown's victory in Mass. 24 hours a day. Fair and Balanced? Hardly! But everyone knows it is not real news on Faux News Channel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
03:12 PM on 01/21/2010
Yes they are, and we should prevent them from spending money on campaigns, but not about talking about them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Sander
12:37 PM on 01/21/2010
I agree with overturning the the corporate as a person rule or thinking. But if it applies to corps, it has to apply to any other legal entity. Non-Profits, Unions, NGOs, etc. That is the only fair way.
02:38 PM on 01/21/2010
I think the decision applies to all legal entities including unions, churches, etc. I think citizens should be granted the rights of corporations, in particular, there should be one tax structure. If corporations can deduct costs of doing business, citizens should be able to deduct the costs of living in the US.

This decision is stupid. Those five Justices should be impeached.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
03:12 PM on 01/21/2010
At this time, I say impeach all nine!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
03:12 PM on 01/21/2010
You got yourself a deal!
photo
PUAAN
antibiotics wiped out my micro-bio
12:18 PM on 01/21/2010
Please add the names of the 5 "justices" who believe that political power should continue to be bought and sold.

(Yeah,I'm too lazy to Google)
02:30 PM on 01/21/2010
The activist Justices -- Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy.