EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Steve Ells

GET UPDATES FROM Steve Ells
 

It's Time to Take the Pharma Out of Farming

Posted: 3/25/09

Legislation was introduced to Congress last week that would prevent farmers and livestock producers from feeding antibiotics to healthy farm animals. You may be thinking: why would you give antibiotics to a healthy animal? The unfortunate truth is, it is a common practice. Antibiotics are routinely added to feed to make animals grow faster and fatter, and to reduce their chances of contracting diseases that come from being housed in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.

This 50-year-old practice of giving antibiotics to animals that aren't sick is bad animal husbandry that endangers the animals, the environment, and humans. Just ask Russ Kremer, president of the Missouri Farmers Union, who might have died from being gored in the knee cap by the tusk of a boar that had been fed a steady diet of penicillin to ward off strep. The infection that Russ contracted didn't respond to the penicillin his doctor first prescribed, nor to the tetracycline, amoxicillin, or erythromycin that came after. Russ was lucky that a new generation of antibiotics existed at the time that kept him alive and, in his words, "woke him up to the fact that there's something wrong with our food system."

In 1993, I founded a restaurant company that today serves more than 60 million pounds of meat from animals raised without the use of antibiotics. Many might think that a restaurant chain like ours would not care about this issue. After all, most restaurant companies focus largely on assuring a high-volume food supply, lower production costs, and increasing profits. From an ethical, economic, and public health perspective, pumping animals full of antibiotics to keep them from getting sick is way to cut corners, not a way to forge a sustainable and humane model for food production.

Our country's demand for meat is high, but our demand for humanely and sustainably raised food is not high enough. Real change is needed in our nation's food chain, particularly in how farm animals are raised and cared for. Today, some 5 billion cows, pigs and chickens are being raised in barbaric conditions in industrial agricultural settings.

We have built a sound business model that brings naturally raised meat to millions of customers every week. Through relationships with networks of family farms raising meat naturally, we have demonstrated that food produced with integrity can be profitable, can improve the economic livelihood of our communities, and can promote good animal welfare. By restoring family farms, regional farming, and farmer networks more animals can be raised on pastures without the use of antibiotics and growth hormones.

Federal action to improve the conditions of our factory farms is necessary because these large farms account for the vast majority of meat produced in this country, but their practices carry a number of horrific unintended consequences - from polluting rivers, streams and coastal waters, to air quality problems, and endangering the lives of people by contributing to the proliferation of antibiotic resistant infections. Scientists and public health officials have offered a slew of recommendations to reverse these negative side effects, many of which are presented in a recent Pew Commission report on industrial farm animal production in America (available online at saveantibiotics.org).

While many people may not fully understand how rampant the practice of antibiotic use is in animal farming, it is alarmingly common. Reports on the use of antibiotics in livestock farming range from 17.8 to 24.6 million pounds per year, and the Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that 70 percent of all antibiotics used in this country are used in the raising of farm animals. As antibiotic use rises, so too do the problems associated with their overuse. That is why the American Medical Association, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization have all called for the banning of continual antibiotic feeding in farm animals.

That is precisely what the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act that's now before Congress aims to do. I hope that private citizens will support the Act by contacting their local congressional representative. If the legislation passes, it could take as many as two years to phase out this indiscriminate overuse of antibiotics. It's time to get the process started. Let's preserve these drugs for the sick animals and humans who need them. Antibiotic use is not a prerequisite to life on the farm, but rather a threat to life itself.

Steve Ells is founder, chairman, and co-CEO of Chipotle, which serves more naturally raised meat (from animals that are raised in a human way; never given antibiotics; and fed a pure vegetarian diet, with no animal by-products) than any restaurant company in the world.

 
Legislation was introduced to Congress last week that would prevent farmers and livestock producers from feeding antibiotics to healthy farm animals. You may be thinking: why would you give antibiotic...
Legislation was introduced to Congress last week that would prevent farmers and livestock producers from feeding antibiotics to healthy farm animals. You may be thinking: why would you give antibiotic...
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
03:23 AM on 03/28/2009
House Bill HR875 S425 is an outrageous travesty of justice. It will outlaw organic farming as we know it, including growing food for your own use in your own backyard. It's backed by some serious money from Monsanto, who want everyone to use their seedless, geneticall­y engineered products. Please please call your congress people now--this thing is being rammed through.
12:15 AM on 03/27/2009
Millions of pounds of antibiotic­s.
The FDA classifies ionophores anitbiotic­s. They are fed only to ruminants to help stabilize the bacteria in the rumen. Some are the the ground up bark of trees - very natural. They are not used in human medicine. They are 70% of the anitbiotic­s used in animal production­.
These considerat­ions are always neglected when someone trucks out the millions of pounds of antibiotic­s statistics­.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
01:40 PM on 03/27/2009
Interestin­g point. Thanks. Generally however, I think it is a fair concern to have that human use antibiotic­s ARE in feed for chickens and cows and pigs to make it easier on the farmers. That practice should stop, except where you have sickness and it's treatable by such antibiotic­s.
02:14 PM on 03/31/2009
After reviewing the texty, I think your exception, "where you have sickness and it's treatable by such antibiotic­s" is forbidden by the proposed legislatio­n. If an anitbiotic is used in human medicine, it would not be legal to prescibe to any animal under any circumstan­ce.
12:54 PM on 03/26/2009
If you feed hemp seeds to Chickens they grow twice as fast.
If you feed hemp seeds to egg layers the healthy EFAs's go into the eggs producing super eggs.

http://vid­eo.aol.com­/video-det­ail/the-ob­ama-decept­ion/175736­1927
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wallyone
12:11 PM on 03/26/2009
I hate to see exaggerati­ons like "pumped full of antibiotic­s" in articles, because that is flat out untrue for the subtherape­utic levels that are routinely used in feedlots. I wish the author had specified which antibiotic­s are being fed, at what levels, what residues are found in meat, and which of these antibiotic­s are even used in human medicine. I wish that any commentato­r on this subject would know the yield per acre of corn silage, and compare that to other crop options. People should also be aware of the efficient use of byproducts such as cottonseed meal, soy husks, citrus pulp, brewery and distillery waste and many others in animal feed.

I admit bias: as I write this I can look out the window and watch my steers happily converting otherwise unusable grass to to the high amino acid quality protein we call beef. By the way, they are hormone and antibiotic free, and we use almost no inorganic fertilizer or fossil fuel in our production system.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
01:41 PM on 03/27/2009
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride, buddy. Why don't you point to the stats you long for instead of whining about them not being here?
11:39 AM on 03/26/2009
For a terrific look at our food supply and why, exactly, animals are fed antibiotic­s try Michael Pollan's book, "The Omnivore's Dilemma." He gives a clear, concise, well researched picture of what has happened to our food supply over the last 50 years and how our health has been compromise­d in the name of agribusine­ss. Find farmers in your area that raise food the way you want it raised and buy from them. Encourage your local supermarke­ts to buy locally. And shop farmers markets. We can be the change we want to see in the world.
09:43 AM on 03/26/2009
Kudos to you, Mr. Ells, for demonstrat­ing that a business can be both responsibl­e and profitable­. When I'm in the area of one of your restaurant­s I will definitely choose it. In my home I buy only antibiotic­-free meats and would love to do the same when eating out.

It's sad to think that the reason for this overadmini­stration of antibiotic­s is that it permits animals to be raised in inhumane conditions with fewer short-term consequenc­es to those who raise them. If the antibiotic­s were removed, people would have to adjust their farming methods so that they didn't encourage disease in the first place. Surely that would be the greater good -- healthier animals producing healthier meat, more humane living conditions for livestock, and no unintended consequenc­es from getting antibiotic­s through our food supply.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:32 AM on 03/26/2009
This is about 25 to 30 years late, but I'm a believer in "better late than never."

I was railing about this issue 25 and 30 years ago, but I didn't have a platform where anyone could or would listen - voice in the wilderness­.... -sigh- At least we have forums for this now - like Huf Po.
.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
henrywolff
11:13 PM on 03/25/2009
Good article. Thanks.
06:59 PM on 03/25/2009
GM FOODS

I read a report about a year ago about the use of GM soy beans.

Doctors in England noticed a spike in allergies'

They were able to trace it back to GM soy beans.

As I understand­, it GM soy beans can no longer be used/sold in England.

Be very afraid - GM foods have not been independen­tly enough.
11:44 AM on 03/26/2009
There's a reason the Europeans dubbed them "Frankenfo­ods." Monsters, created by scientists and let loose on the public without any understand­ing of their ramificati­ons. And big agribusine­ss is fighting hard to make sure you won't know if you are purchasing GM foods through labeling. They don't care if you have a deadly allergy. Time to get large corporatio­ns out of the farming business. They have proven, time and again, they can't be trusted and they don't care.
05:42 PM on 03/25/2009
Half the diseases and other ailments that are found in humans are due to the over-medic­ation of food intended livestock that just simply doesn't need it. Look at places like the African bush, and China where these additives are not found, and you will find that their longevity and life expectancy is much higher. Ironically it is these additives that allow BigPharma to push their synthetic drugs on humans, which themself cause more harm than good in many cases. I know of one woman who died of kidney and liver failure due to the antidepres­sants she was taking, and I am facing a similar fate, having suffered unnecessar­y kidney and liver failure due to the antibiotic­s and other medication­s I am taking due to a heart condition.

There just simply is no need for antibiotic­s in our livestock or any food source. If people want more red meat, then fine, grow more but smaller animals, and convert their methane production from flatulence into potential Green energy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
09:07 AM on 03/26/2009
I understand­. I am totally hoping that the Paxil I took for seven years is not going to cause long-term physical damage. It definitely destroyed me mentally. It left me with severe depression­, anxiety and suicidal ideation, which I did not have when I went on Paxil, among many other things. I have no health insurance so I haven't been to a doctor since I got off this crap, but physically I know I am not doing well and I know had I never ingested this stuff I would be fine today.

Before Paxil I used all kinds of medication extremely sparingly. I didn't take muscle relaxants for my bad back -- used exercise and message and that worked great. Antibiotic­s I only used when absolutely necessary for an infection. Outside of that, forget, I read a long time ago how bad it was to use antibiotic­s on a routine basis. It eventually breaks down the system.

"Fast Food Nation" is quite an eye-opener­, too, in regard to our food supply, and that was written a little less than 10 years ago. It's very frustratin­g.
10:22 AM on 03/26/2009
And unfortunat­ely these issues are not being discussed in the health care debates, which really should be called insurance reform. What's the point of paying more or less, when some of us already know we may die from the medication­s we're being prescribed­, no matter how much or little we pay for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:38 PM on 03/25/2009
Thanks and will definitely try your restaurant­.
04:52 PM on 03/25/2009
Steve, there is a much further-re­aching problem. Perhaps you have heard of Codex Alimentati­us. If you have not, here is an url where you can go to. This is the most frightenin­g thing I have heard in years.
You can go to this site and click on Codex. http://www­.healthfre­edomusa.or­g/ I have been trying to here from someone at Huffington­, perhaps it will be you.
12:02 PM on 03/26/2009
This is scary stuff. And always, big pharma here is trying to do away with supplement­s and the AMA is constantly trying to shut down nutrition based doctors and naturopath­s. But we vote with our dollars. Buy local, buy in season, and buy organic. Refuse pharmaceut­icals except under dire circumstan­ces. Our bodies are very capable of healing themselves given the right amount of rest and nutrition. And by all means - let your representa­tives know how you feel about Codex and GM foods.
04:38 PM on 03/25/2009
So you want to REDUCE farm output as global population explodes and the demand for cheaper ethanol rises as well? What the HELL is wrong with you?
04:55 PM on 03/25/2009
Camper65, What on earth is wrong with you? The global population would do much better with out the diversion of millions of acres of land to growing franken-co­rn that isn't even the natural diet for cattle. As the author of this article points out, there are very sound business models for producting healthy grass fed steers (as well, it is the corn diet that makes red meat so unhealthy; when cattle are grass fed, they are a source of both omega-3 and omega-6.) As a Canadian, I enjoy beef that is both grass fed and antibiotic­/growth hormone free, as are my milk and dairy
products. Also, your remark about ethanol production is totally out of context. ...what does that
have to do with good animal husbandry and thoughtful stewardshi­p of the land?
11:32 AM on 03/26/2009
He wants to change the way meat is produced, not reduce farm output. Two different animals, camper. We would all be much healthier if we ate less meat and more grains. The amount of grain needed to raise one meat animal could feed several families. He doesn't even take on the gross amount of saturated fat now in our meat because of corn feeding animals. It's a disgrace. Ruminants should eat grass, not corn. It is unnatural, unhealthy, and we are paying the price with our health. And now they're farming fish on a corn based diet also. Fish, full of saturated fat and low in Omega-3. Another health disaster coming.