Obama is in the lead, both nationally and in some very key battleground states. This election is his to lose. But elections can be surprising affairs. Let's ask a question: What combination of factors would need to occur for Obama to lose? And how realistic is that scenario?
Here are some important factors to keep in mind.
1. You can't trust the polls. We have seen too many examples in the past when the polls were misleading. When you have "national" polls purporting to show that Obama has a lead in one poll of 12 points and in another poll of two points, that tells you something is off. So much for the "science" of polling. When I see a poll that tells me they have a margin of error of 3.5%, I double that. A poll with a seven percent margin of error is only good for giving you some indication of general trends, nothing more.
2. Undecided voters. In recent presidential elections, the undecided voters have broken for the Republican candidate. And a recent poll from the Associated Press found that 1 in 7 voters are still undecided. Assuming this poll is accurate, that's a lot of undecided voters, about 18 million. If the undecided voters break for McCain 60% to 40%, that's a pick up of 3.6 million voters for McCain. If spread across the right battleground states, that could translate into a McCain victory.
3. "Invisible" voters. On both sides, we keep hearing about all these "invisible" voters who will turn out for them. On the Obama side, a lot of young voters supposedly are going to vote this time -- but we have heard that before. Then supposedly there are a lot of newly registered minority voters. But African-American voters have voted at nearly the same percentage as whites, so there might not be much potential there for an increase. Latino and Asian voters might increase some, but those populations don't necessarily identify closely with a black candidate. So let's make a modest assumption that there will be some increase, but not the tsunami that some are predicting.
On the Republican side, the invisible voters would be not only those undecided voters who break late for McCain, but also those who are part of the notorious "Bradley effect," i.e. white voters who won't vote for a black candidate yet don't show up in the polls that way. Polls have found that a fair number of Americans will not vote for a black candidate, so we can assume some degree of a Bradley effect, but how much? No one really knows.
So let's say that, on the whole, these two pools of invisible voters cancel each other out. We don't know ultimately how these factors will play, but erring on the side of caution, let's say it's a wash.
4. The winning Republican playbook. The McCain campaign is using the same Republican campaign plan that has been successful in winning presidential elections since Nixon. That involves attacking the Democratic candidate as a tax-and-spend, big government liberal who is un-American, is a socialist and a pal of terrorists who is not part of the cultural fabric of mainstream America.
The common wisdom is that the Republican template is not working this year due to the economic crisis, which is widely blamed on the incumbent party. On the other hand, if so many voters are still undecided at this point in the election, then clearly there is something about Obama and the Democrats that make them uncomfortable. Something about Obama/Democrats has not allowed them to close the deal on this election. So the McCain strategy of slowly chipping away at Obama's lead using the same old Republican playbook may pay off yet in these last few days, as it has worked previously with the undecideds.
5. Disqualified voters. Around the country, tens of thousands of registered voters have been purged, many of them through no fault of their own but due to clerical errors which have caused a mismatch in their name in various state databases. The evidence indicates that most of these voters are probably Obama supporters, so the Obama advantage in new registrants may be muted.
Also, like in past elections the Republicans are doing everything they can to disqualify Democratic voters. They are preparing to challenge certain types of voters at the polls, even possibly challenging voters who have lost their home mortgages and had to change addresses, making their voter registration invalid. There are reports of letters being mailed to minority voters warning them of possible arrest if they try to vote and have any outstanding traffic violations. No one knows how effective or widespread these efforts will be.
6. Defective voting equipment and poor election administration. We already are hearing stories from around the country about problems with voting equipment. One problem has been "vote flipping" on touchscreen voting equipment that lacks a voter verified paper trail -- a voter selects one candidate and the machine picks another candidate for them. This probably results from lousy voting equipment rather than some conspiracy to steal an election, yet it's really odd that all the anecdotes seem to indicate that it's usually a Democratic vote that gets flipped to the Republican candidate.
Also, remember the "butterfly ballot" in Florida in 2000, which caused thousands of voters to select the wrong candidate? In 2004, no one anticipated there would be so few pieces of voting equipment in university precincts and black precincts in Ohio, causing extremely long lines and people to go home frustrated without voting. What election administration snafus await us in this election? Nobody knows.
OK, so let's add up our six factors. All the polls show Obama with a lead, but with polls having a mixed track record, we don't really know how sizable. Meanwhile, there seem to be a fair number of undecided voters who historically have broken for the Republican candidate. The Democratic candidate is African-American with a known Bradley effect out there, though the impact is difficult to quantify. There are unknown questions lingering about defective voting equipment, faulty election administration, purged voters, and Republican attempts to disqualify Democratic voters. What will be their impact, ultimately, on vote totals?
Given all these factors, is there a plausible scenario in which McCain could win? I would say yes, absolutely. Perhaps not likely, but certainly plausible. There is also a plausible scenario in which Obama wins handily. The truth is, there are too many moving parts in this election to know for sure. But if all the above factors line up just the right way, the nation could be in for a shock on Election Night.
As former President Bill Clinton once said, "The paranoid win elections." And now we know why.
Steven Hill is director of the Political Reform Program of the New America Foundation, and author of "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy" (www.10Steps.net)
VATICAN CITY — President Barack Obama sat down with...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
How would you like to live in the White House? Take the HuffPost Poll of World Leaders' Residences...
UPDATE: Paris Jackson also spoke. Watch her moving...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
As our own Jason Linkins pointed out, Letterman is one of the few comedians...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
I get many letters like this from readers...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
As a registered Republican, It"s awkward to witness that as the end nears for the McCain campaign that the Senator has elected to gain popularity by distancing himself from the views of our current administration, if only America had no memory. Perhaps Senator McCain has finally realized that the majority of Americans simply have had enough and he now recognizes his disconnect from the American population, as it"s difficult to understand how someone who claims to be so passionate about leading a nation has no idea on how to communicate with it. The Senator"s inconsistencies on how to lead a nation runs more ramped than a virus and it is clear that the McCain has fallen ill. Had the Senator demonstrated an ability to share his viewpoints in a consistent manner at an early onset, he may have had a chance of gaining additional support within his own party, yet McCain"s pendulum type thinking has left many Americans wondering what he actually believes or stands for. The numerous latent detachments from the Bush administration and prior proclamations made by the Senator have left Americans with no idea of what to accept as truth. How could one have faith in a man who obviously forgets what his agenda was last week as it"s been replaced with a new from week to week? Winning the race for another "notch on the political bedpost" may be an accomplishment for Senator McCain, but it will regrettably lead this country into greater distress.
.
Please don't confuse me. I can't believe all the polls are wrong, and they all call it for Obama. Meet me here after the election and I'll treat you to some crow.
Interesting article. But right off the bat, there is faulty logic. The author indicates that "you can't trust the polls." And then proceeds to state in a following section: "Assuming this poll is accurate," when cherry-picking one that supports a point he is making. Raises a red flag.
While his conclusion is certainly possible, the reasoning he uses to reach that conclusion is flawed and far-fetched.
What I've learned about polling is minuscule. Obviously some are better than others. However it boils down to whether people get out and vote. No one can take this election for granted.
The republicans want the race to tighten so that the number of people purged from the rolls combined with malfunctioning machines and voter suppression McCain will eke out a win.
So it depends on each one of you to get out and vote. [I've already voted] Don't let anything stop you.
McCain can win the old fashioned Republican way--
Cheat
Lie
Steal
It's worked twice in the last 8 years!
enough of this negativity b.s. enough hand-wringing. enough crap. get out and knock on doors, get your friends and family to vote, and let's get this win.
VOLUNTEER!
After reading this you had better hop down to the nearest Obama campaign office to help out. It's not tough at all, and actually inspiring, intriguing, and fun.
VOLUNTEER! Especially in battlegrounds states and on election day!!
Well, let's see - I've already voted, in a new state and town for me, on an electronic voting machine with paper back-up. I triple-checked the electronic record and the paper record before touching the screen to cast. I was signature-checked before being permitted to vote. I live in a battleground state. And I still don't think it's a lock. I chose hope over fear. I chose the future over the past. That was a conscious choice.
But fear acts as an unconscious choice. Fear doesn't think. Fear pulls the blanket over its head. I don't fear what McCagey wants me to fear. I fear the Thought police. I fear the further abridgement of my civil liberties and rights. I fear having my phone and internet tapped because I considered something out of line. I fear the expanded exportation of American jobs. I fear the desperation of the growing homeless, jobless contingent. I fear getting hit by a car and not being able to get treated in a hospital due to deficient health insurance. I fear not having the choice to abort a child of incest or rape. I fear the creation of more homeless and jobless refugees due to rising sea levels caused by climate change. So, yes, I may have to say I voted out of fear. But that fear caused me to vote for Obama.
Ed Rollins said today on CN he expects Obama to win handily. Ed would not have said that if he didn't believe it, and he has access to good polling data.
Sorry Steve. Concern trolling a bit aren't we?
I don't think that the undecideds will swing Republican this time around. The reign of George W should give enough pause to make them consider another alternative.
Can't agree with Steven Hill. Gore Vidal is very good, with Jon Snow on Channel 4. http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/international_politics/gore+vidal+ready+to+kill/2238447
He was particularly good at Cal Poly on Russians @19.00. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=638103060646285609&ei=OtoNSamyJZn-qAOn24XQBA&q=gore+vidal+interview&hl=en
So after all that your conclusion is "we don't know."
Brilliant.
I would not so easily dismiss the idea of voter machines being messed with by republicans.
this isn't paranoia, this is right in line with republicans owning the electronic voting machines- they should be in jail, frankly, but we are still using their machines- diebold with a new name- this is insanity.
I would put nothing, nothing past the repubs.
The new york post had a front page today that was really creepy- Mccain dressed like a magician, pullling a rabbit out of a hat- predicting his win. I think that image is very possible....
At the NYC marathon today- it's awesome, totally international, people from all over the world, cheering each other on- a beautiful thing- and it really felt like this is the kind of world Obama represents- international, inclusive, and positive-- and Mccain/Palin is the narrow minded, old, divisive, hate-filled lesser part of our nature that keeps wanting to strangle us and hold us back...
Not this time!!!
You forgot another risk factor: Voters (for Obama) trusting those claiming this will be a landslide, hence not bothering to queue to cast their votes.
Don't take this for granted. Go vote!!!!!
This isn't the Republican Playbook. That's the Rove playbook they've been following, and it's blowing up in their face.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or