More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steven M. Gillon

GET UPDATES FROM Steven M. Gillon
 

President Gingrich? Not as Scary as It Sounds

Posted: 11/22/11 03:51 PM ET

A recent surge in the polls has brought added scrutiny to the presidential ambitions of Newt Gingrich. While Republican primary voters seem to be willing to give the former House Speaker a second look, he remains a long shot to win the nomination.

But what would a Gingrich presidency look like? I would suggest that it would not be as radical as liberals fear or as revolutionary as conservatives hope. He would govern as a centrist conservative who would likely propose bold solutions to many problems.

Interviews with Gingrich, his aides and staff, shaped my views of the former House Speaker -- views that I discuss in my book,The Pact. His rich collection of private papers, housed at West Georgia State University, proved to be the most valuable resource. Perhaps in a moment of weakness, when a future presidential run seemed less likely, Gingrich granted me access to these papers. Surprisingly, the Gingrich that emerges from these pages is a practical politician, certainly more moderate then the caricature we are seeing on the campaign trail today.

As a student in the 1960s, Gingrich was more contrarian than conservative, more libertarian than liberal. He was a Republican more out of instinct than ideology. At Tulane University he defended the right of the school paper to publish obscene photographs. In 1968, he worked for the presidential campaign of liberal Republican Nelson Rockefeller. Gingrich would not want his Tea Party backers to know this, but for most of his career Newt described himself as a "Teddy Roosevelt" Republican, stressing the need for a limited but strong federal government. He avoided talking about controversial social issues such as abortion or gay rights. "I would never vote against my conscience," Gingrich told his staff. "On the other hand, I also make it a habit to have relatively few things I feel bitterly moral about."

In 1983, after two lackluster terms in the House and no clear vision for the future, Gingrich turned to an unlikely source for inspiration. He traveled to New York, where he met with Richard Nixon. The disgraced former president suggested that Gingrich put together a group of "Young Turks" to challenge the moderate leadership of his party and start articulating an alternative message. Gingrich took the advice to heart, returned to Washington, and started recruiting young conservatives to spearhead a revolution within the Republican Party that culminated with Newt being elected House Speaker in 1995.

Even during this period, however, Gingrich made a distinction between politics -- the sometimes inflammatory words one has to say to win elections -- and governing -- the responsible steps that elected officials must take to solve problems. Throughout his career, the visionary, thoughtful policymaker has competed with the ruthless, take-no-prisoners, political strategist.

Gingrich has always been brilliant at arousing the Republican faithful by framing issues as choices between good and evil. Yet, you always get the sense that Gingrich never fully believed his own rhetoric. Intellectually, he understood that policies are often negotiated in the gray area between ideological extremes. Unfortunately for him, an entire generation of Republicans would come to power adopting his strategy and his message, while failing to appreciate the distinction between means and ends.

During the tense 1995 budget negotiations that resulted in two government shutdowns the key players in the Clinton White House viewed Gingrich as a practical politician trapped by the ideological leanings of his caucus. Gingrich's strategy was to talk tough in public, keeping the pressure on the White House, while trying to work out a compromise in private. In large meetings, surrounded by congressional colleagues and White House staffers, Gingrich postured, delivering what amounted to an ultimatum to the president. In smaller gatherings with just the president and his chief of staff, Gingrich set a different tone. "Behind the scenes he was working to avoid the shutdown," reflected White House Chief-of-Staff Leon Panetta. "In private conversations Gingrich would often say that he would like to get things done," Panetta recalled. "He was more accommodating in private than in public."

After the budget debacle, Gingrich distanced himself from the conservative wing of his own party and worked with President Clinton on passing a balanced budget bill. In 1997, he joined the president in developing the outlines of a bold and controversial plan for entitlement reform. The Lewinsky scandal, however, destroyed any hope of passing a bipartisan measure and it quickly died.

Gingrich has also been unfairly tagged as the architect of the Republican plan to impeach President Clinton. As Speaker, Gingrich was ultimately responsible for the impeachment effort. He did not, however, lead the charge. With the exception of an inflammatory speech before a GOPAC meeting in April 1998, Gingrich was remarkably restrained in his response to the scandal. It is unclear whether his restraint was the result of political calculation or fear that his own private life might come under scrutiny. In either case, he often nudged hardliners to tone down their rhetoric while manipulating the system to prevent the impeachment process from becoming too partisan. At one point, he proposed moving the impeachment proceedings from the highly-partisan Judiciary Committee to a special committee that he would appoint, but his caucus rebelled and the speaker backed down.

Gingrich knows better than anyone that promoting bipartisan plans for entitlement reform and championing compromise with Democrats is not an effective way to endear himself to Republican primary voters. So the partisan Newt will continue to lash out at the media for its "liberal" bias, attack "Occupy Wall Street" protestors as immoral, and condemn President Obama as incompetent. Unfortunately, the nation is seeing only one side of this very complicated and talented politician.

 
 
 
A recent surge in the polls has brought added scrutiny to the presidential ambitions of Newt Gingrich. While Republican primary voters seem to be willing to give the former House Speaker a second look...
A recent surge in the polls has brought added scrutiny to the presidential ambitions of Newt Gingrich. While Republican primary voters seem to be willing to give the former House Speaker a second look...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:18 PM on 12/01/2011
Scary doesn't begin to sum up a Gingrinch Presidency. More like Apocalyptic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ManuOB1
A voice crying in the wilderness
08:27 AM on 11/23/2011
Wasn't the History Channel's penchant for fabricating stories an episodeon South Park?
Rogell
Proud Veteran
11:55 PM on 11/22/2011
That's a question that will go unanswered, because we'll never know...thankgoodness!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
11:45 PM on 11/22/2011
Well his amnesty ideas are not going to help him at all,thats for sure.I understood what he was talking about when he was going on about using high schoolers to do janitorial work in the schools and get paid.Well sure it would be much cheaper than using unionised janitors and there's really not millions of unionised janitors these days especially the ones cleaning schools but the fact remains if that happened then it';s going tp put people with familys to support out of a job as well so it's a good but not so good of an idea
11:21 PM on 11/22/2011
"Unfortunately, the nation is seeing only one side of this very complicated and talented politician."

Uh, the nation saw more than enough of Gingrich when he was in Congress. What more do we need to see of him?

Just because the Repubs are having mass amnesia as they contemplate a Romney Administration does mean the rest of us have forgotten.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
army193
10:40 PM on 11/22/2011
This statement alone should disqualify him from being our President.

"Gingrich has always been brilliant at arousing the Republican faithful by framing issues as choices between good and evil. Yet, you always get the sense that Gingrich never fully believed his own rhetoric. Intellectually, he understood that policies are often negotiated in the gray area between ideological extremes. Unfortunately for him, an entire generation of Republicans would come to power adopting his strategy and his message, while failing to appreciate the distinction between means and ends."
09:12 PM on 11/22/2011
If you're a moderate that thinks "President Gingrich" doesn't sound scary, consider how "Gingrich appointee Supreme Court Justice...." would sound to you, then think again.
photo
aacme
My micro-bio is on a strict need-to-know basis.
08:21 PM on 11/22/2011
If the History Channel served up any history, beyond the occasional WW II rehash, I would be a lot more interested in what,its resident historian thinks. At least, until he started talking about a Gingrich presidency.
That puts him right up there with "Modern Miracles: Watching Paint Dry". Except a lot scarier.
07:31 PM on 11/22/2011
This, a defense of the idea of a Gingrich presidency, is more akin to wishful thinking than objectivity. Granted, in some respects Gingrich outdistances his opponents, in that he at least knows where Syria and Iran are, but his 'solutions' to various global and national problems are extreme, to say the least. He is an absolute hypocrite, decrying taxes and 'big government', yet his takings from Freddie/Fannie show that he only 'talks the talk'... at the expense of the taxpayer. His very history, legislative and rhetorical gives absolutely no evidence that he would govern as a centrist conservative. No, he cannot be trusted with power.
photo
Harbinger08
You have the right to remain silent
07:25 PM on 11/22/2011
Let me see. "President Newt Gingrich." Nope, still pretty dang scary.
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
07:17 PM on 11/22/2011
His comment that there are "few things I feel bitterly moral about" is telling. It explains why he took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac for "advice". He has no moral conflict with accepting money for nothing.
Citizen54
Conservatism is a con job!
06:53 PM on 11/22/2011
The History Channel.
Oh yeah, that's the station that now presents shows about people selling old stuff in their attics.
photo
angryoldman
No1 told me when 2 run I missed the starting gun
06:29 PM on 11/22/2011
Why can't we have politicians that say what they mean and mean what they say? Is that too much to ask for? ( that goes for any and all parties.)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
06:21 PM on 11/22/2011
Shouldn't this be on the Comedy page?
jhNY
Mercy.
06:14 PM on 11/22/2011
And not nearly as likely as it is scary.