AP: Unprecedented Internet Demand to Replace Sheen with Stamos/Weber
In a move sure to make CBS executives sit up and take notice, a swell of "cyber-citizens" have called upon the Diamond Network to fill the gap left by the Charlie Sheen controversy with not one but TWO actors: Steven Weber and John Stamos.
Early reports indicate that if hired, the actors would in fact play ONE character: a cousin of Sheen's character who are Siamese twins joined at their mutually shared "taint."
CBS has so far officially denied the story; however, unnamed network sources have indicated that it is indeed a direction they and the show's creator Chuck Lorre might be interested in pursuing. "There's a demographic out there that likes that stuff," says the source.
Weber, best known for Wings and Studio 60 and the much more famous Stamos are actually good friends in real life and have no compunction about sharing a role and/or a taint.
Also, all of the above is purportedly based on a series of unsubstantiated rumors supposedly started by an unnamed source who may or may nor have access to The Huffington Post's backstage blogging area.
And also, what you just red may not even have been written by him. Did I say "him"? I meant "whomever".
And also, "red" was possibly purposely misspelled. I mean, I meant "read" but I was was in a rush. And I saw it but, you know, whatever.
Did I say "I"? I meant "whomever." Again.
Follow Steven Weber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheStevenWeber
I am completely stumped. Who could this source have been?
" TAINT MISBEHAVIN' " ... starring Stamos / Weber.
Don't forget to tip your waitress!
(I'll be here all of 3 minutes)
Nothing against Stamos, but his presence would only diffuse Weber's sardonic wit. Not kissing up to you Steven, just stating the obvious.
Has the wife 'red' this and did she say, 'Eeeeewwww"?
During that first season of the Colbert Report and the first year of HuffingtonPost I created this name as a tribute to him and the satire concept of his show, and not just the definition behind truthiness. OUR profiles here used to viewable by anyone. My profile has always stated I'm a pragmatist that abhors the absolutism of anyone placing their faith above anything so trivial as facts. I felt the show was so enlightening for many in that same regard and so in tune with my personal principles of logic, that I then made my profile and username a tribute to his work. I still see no reason whatsoever to change that original logic. FYI...
http://www.toonbee.com/story/panda/20110301/too-bad