iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stu Kreisman

Stu Kreisman

Posted: November 1, 2010 08:12 PM

Dear President Obama,

First off, I want to tell you that despite the enormous landmines set in place by George W. Bush and the Republicans, you have accomplished amazing things in your first two years in office. You have saved the country from another depression, pushed through landmark health care legislation; you have slowed the downward spiral of job losses, ended the war in Iraq and cut taxes on most of the nation.

I enthusiastically canvassed for you in '08, registered voters, manned phone banks and contributed money. However, this election cycle I did none of the above and refused to contribute money to the DCCC. Let me explain.

I am a liberal. I am also your base. Yes, I understand that the rule in politics is don't sacrifice the good for the perfect. However, your progressive base was asked not just to sacrifice time and time again, we were held up to ridicule and blamed by your administration for your shortcomings, of which there were plenty.

You came into office with a huge mandate. You campaigned on changing the toxic atmosphere in Washington. You offered to reach across the aisle and involve Republicans in decision-making. All noble gestures and, true to your word, you made the effort. No problem there. You're a man of your word. You tried.

However... you didn't know when to stop. You continued to pander to the right desperately searching for common ground. A week after the inauguration, Rush Limbaugh announced that he hoped that you failed. Another tip off should have been the stimulus package. Although you consulted with them and watered it down on their advice, not one Republican voted to help save the economy. When given the choice of saving the country or destroying your Presidency, the Republicans chose destruction over patriotism. You were not dealing with rational people.

We voted for change and a fresh start. This was a "New Deal" moment. Instead, we on the left were disappointed by the number of Clinton re-treads you choose for positions in your administration. With the Clintonistias came the failed theory of triangulation. It didn't work then and it isn't working now. (Ironically, the one Clinton holdover who's done a fantastic job is Hillary. She was an inspired choice for Secretary Of State.)

To say that the opposition doesn't like you is an understatement. They hate you. No matter what you do for them, they will never vote for you. (Would it have hurt you to make the Republicans physically filibuster whenever they invoked it? It's called political theater and it would have demonstrated to the uneducated what the Repubicans really stood for. Trust me, they're going to make Democrats do it even if they whisper the that 'f' word.) Yet you continued to let them off the hook and pander to them at the expense of your base, the progressives.

Again not wanting to annoy the right, you didn't fire (as was your right as President) all the Bush-appointed federal prosecutors. These were the ones who passed Karl Rove's neo-con smell test for partiality. You never mentioned Bush other than to praise him. Previous problems were always referred to as events of "the past ten years." People needed to know what destruction Bush and the Republicans did in plain English rather than in polite, veiled references. Instead, you handed the right wing a stronger stranglehold of the judiciary as a peace offering. (By the way, are you surprised that the Republicans have blocked most of your judicial nominations?) Was this an olive branch to the right? If so, they threw it right back in your face and laughed.

The Republicans and conservative Democrats played you like a cheap fiddle during the health care "debate." It never really was a debate. By allowing Max Baucus and his bipartisan group of six to take charge of the bill, they played a stall game and the delay opened a void during the August recess that was filled by the teabaggers. The mainstream media fell in love with the teabaggers because yelling, rage and the possibility of violence (even manufactured and paid for) makes for good TV. By trying to let all sides be heard (even after Sen. DeMint announced that Healthcare will be your Waterloo), you lost control of the narrative. Where were the denunciations of the lies about "Death Panels?" Who gave the store away by giving in to republican demands delaying most of the new laws until 2014? Why were you always on the defensive? Who was calling the Republicans out on their lies? Certainly not the administration or the media. They have such little respect for you and Progressives that Andrew Breitbart was just hired by ABC News as a commentator on Election Night. (Speaking of the media, where was your FCC when it was discovered that Fox had contributed a million dollars to the Republican Governor's Association? What about Fox using the public airwaves as a tool to solicit money for Republican candidates? And what has your FCC done to safeguard Net Neutrality? Once the Internet goes, the truth will be lost for generations.)

You constantly referred to the summer of '09 and the more recent atrocities as "the silly season." It was far from silly. Teabaggers weren't good and decent people who felt alienated by the ballooning deficit as you rationalized. They were a small, well-orchestrated group of selfish, ignorant Fox viewers who were repulsed not by the deficit, but by the color of your skin. They brought guns to rallies. They lied constantly. They physically threatened citizens who attended Town Halls and refused to let Democrats speak. They posed under pictures of holocaust victims, referring to you as another Hitler on a regular basis. They painted Swastikas on Democratic congressmen's windows. They shot and killed people because Glenn Beck and the other Fox puppet heads lied and announced as a regular talking point that you were going to take away their guns. They spat on Democratic lawmakers. They stomped on the head of people who didn't agree with them. These are not good and decent people. They're psychopaths and trying to placate them or identify with some of their grievances was a waste of time. They are a small minority of the electorate who managed to get the lion's share of publicity and exposure at your expense.

No need to go into you administration's numerous quotes blaming the left, unions and progressive bloggers for all the country's ills. Who was making these communication decisions? Were you and your administration that smug to think that the left would understand? Why were Howard Dean, George Lakoff and the great minds of the left banished to the hinterlands? What was their crime other than being Liberals?

Your administration's communication skills are, to be honest, horrible. Would it have been so hard to put up a commercial with the jobs created/lost graph showing that just after you took office you stopped the hemorrhaging? This is the land of the scared and the stupid. Trying to explain that losing 80,000 jobs a month is better than losing 750,000 a month is a hard abstract for these knuckleheads to wrap their simplistic minds around. They needed pictures to understand. Where were the national Democratic commercials of Joe Barton apologizing, "ashamed" of you and your "shakedown" of BP? This from the congressman who will now become the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Where were the national commercials of John Boehner screaming "Hell no you can't!" Where were the talking points promoting your tax cut? Where were the ads exposing the Chamber of Commerce and the Koch Brothers? Where was the fight? Where was the passion? And you wonder why a large number of young voters stayed home?

Do you really believe if (God forbid) we are hit again like on 9-11, the entire country will rally around you like they did behind George Bush? The right is salivating at the thought of another catastrophe. And when it happens, the first words out of their mouths will be "I told you so" and they will call for your impeachment. These are the people you tried to placate instead of us. You forfeited your bully pulpit to Rupert Murdoch. Yet we've become the piñatas for your administration's frustrations.

"No Drama Obama" didn't work. Hate, lies and videotape of teabaggers stepping on Progressive's skulls are in. We elected Barack Obama, not Gandhi to lead us. Passive resistance doesn't compute to a Fox viewer. While I'm glad that your personal approval numbers are still high, they could have been so much higher had you listened to someone like Bernie Sanders instead of cow towing to Joe Lieberman. Passion is what motivates voters. Franklin Roosevelt welcomed his opponent's hatred. You seem oblivious to it.

The woman who told you "I'm... exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change that I voted for" was absolutely right. You're mistake was being idealistic and naïve. Republicans were never a true opposition. You can have a civil conversation with an opponent. They treated you as an enemy of the United States and Progressive bloggers were the ones on the front lines defending you. It was Think Progress that uncovered the Chamber Of Commerce's plan to funnel foreign funds into the election. Sites like Daily Kos did more to help get out the vote than Tim Kaine. Media Matters was doing the administration's job of pointing out the lies and hypocrisy of the right while CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN were breathlessly reporting on Mel Gibson's marital woes. Fox was busy soliciting funds for radical right candidates who hid from the public. The Left is already taking the blame from the corporate media for losing the election and I'm sure we'll hear the same from the White House. In fact, the Left was the only group that constantly defended you against the tidal wave of lies and distortions. Tacking to the center-right was a disastrous move on your administration's part. The truth is that the majority of Americans are center-left. By playing tough against the "lefties" you played right into the narrative of the conservatives. This is how you created the "enthusiasm gap."

So now we're in for two years of gridlock and hell. There's going to be a lot of yelling and posturing from the right and nothing is going to get done. The Republicans have no idea how to generate jobs or stimulate the economy, and they will not give you a single vote on anything that will. They'll probably shut down the government and blame it on you. Yet you've already announced that you see opportunities to work with Republicans after Election Day. Wrong. You fight them because you are on the correct side of the issues. You cannot reason with people who worship at the alter of Sarah Palin (One part Joe McCarthy, One part Father Coughlin and one part Lindsay Lohan.)

So this is why I didn't go all out this year. I voted, but I'm dispirited. We on the left are fighters and it just took the wind out of our sails when you refused to fight back. I hope I'm wrong about a lot of what I've written here. I'm rooting for you. I want to walk the districts make the GOTV calls with enthusiasm again. I still believe you can be a leader for the ages and you're the only one who can get us out this mess. I'll vote for you in 2012 but Mr. President, you're not making it easy to do so. It's time to dance with the ones that brought you to the White House. If you don't, you'll be dancing alone back in Chicago in three years and that will be a tragedy not just for you but also for the United States.

Respectfully,
A Proud Progressive


 
Dear President Obama, First off, I want to tell you that despite the enormous landmines set in place by George W. Bush and the Republicans, you have accomplished amazing things in your first two year...
Dear President Obama, First off, I want to tell you that despite the enormous landmines set in place by George W. Bush and the Republicans, you have accomplished amazing things in your first two year...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:51 PM on 12/10/2010
Get a clue Stu. He tried to govern directly from the left and the voters threw him, er eh...his agenda out the window. He's finished unless he moves right.
07:57 AM on 11/13/2010
The American people are a funny lot... We fell in love with Barack Obama during his campaign, we swooned at the mere flash of his megawatt smile, we loved his soaring rhetoric and calm, easygoing demeanor. We were SO excited to have a President that exuded intellect and debate over the knee-jerk reactions of the previous administration.

And yet, the people at large must not have been paying attention to the details. When Obama started putting into place the policies that he had been campaigning on, all of a sudden we didn't like it. Even though he was pushing for the EXACT same things he promised he would do as "candidate Obama", the difference was night and day.

I believe Obama's biggest crime is being naive. He thought the public would thoughtfully consider his proposals and policy decisions.. He didn't package his ideas in easy to understand snippets that the talking heads could dive into. We are truly a nation of sound bites and immediate gratification... which is unfortunately the Republican's forte.

I will passionately campaign for Obama in 2012.. I think when the American people yet again see the alternative to Obama, they will wake up and vote again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emma richmond
03:29 AM on 11/13/2010
Let get one thing straight, the President was not the cause the Democrats Losing the seat, look back and you people would see the most lost seat was the Blue Dog, who campigned against the President and Nancy and the Health Care, there was 40 Blue Dogs who voted with the Republicans 99 percent against the President, if you people notice and do your home work, the Blue Dogs that lost voted against the Health Care Bill, some of the Blue Dogs even Ran Ads against the President and Nancy, they lost, people don't like traitors. The President is not the Blame, some of the Southern Democrats didn't want the President campaigning for them they lost, but yet they use the money he raised, but all the People he campaigned for won except about 3, CA, NV, WA, CONN., Delaware, MA, and IL, gov. Quinn. these are the People who ask him to campaigned for them, they won. Yes I will and my Group will also Vote for President Obama in 2012, because he's the best we have had in History, he have done more in 23 Months then Clinton or Bush got done in 8 years. Ironic you people don't look at that. We do agree about he should kick all of the Clinton people out, because you can't trust them, maybe that Snake Bill Clinton will stay away.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhereSheStops
Mathematical conservative
04:39 PM on 11/09/2010
"They shot and killed people because Glenn Beck and the other Fox puppet heads lied and announced as a regular talking point that you were going to take away their guns."

Links?
07:49 AM on 11/13/2010
Link.
07:49 AM on 11/13/2010
I'm not sure if my clickable link worked, so you may have to copy and paste. I'm sorry T_T

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2010/1016/Did-Glenn-Beck-s-rhetoric-inspire-violence
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhereSheStops
Mathematical conservative
11:31 AM on 11/13/2010
Thank you for trying to answer my question. Honestly appreciated. However, I don't see that it says people were killed because of Beck and others at Fox.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhereSheStops
Mathematical conservative
04:38 PM on 11/09/2010
"You never mentioned Bush other than to praise him."

What?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhereSheStops
Mathematical conservative
11:27 AM on 11/13/2010
One instance of praise is not the same as as "never mentioning Bush other than to praise him".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shastaman
12:44 PM on 11/09/2010
Well said Mr. Kreisman !
Perhaps this is part of their jenious strategy to bring us together as a nation
The people who worked so hard in 08 and have been waiting with baited breath for some muscle to show up in support of our efforts are spent and disappointed
It will be nice to hear if the POTUS responds to your critique
It'll be nicer to watch him do so , but I'm not holding my breath
01:48 PM on 11/04/2010
I too had, and somewhat still have, hope for change. I also had hopes that Obama's election was a signal that our country was ready to embrace the richness of diversity and to embrace the hopes and ideals of working class people. However, it is apparent that Obama's election has brought to the surface the true temperament of people who are more willing to embrace fear, hatred and racism.The elephant in the room of the discussion of liberal and progressive disappointment, is that no one in this demographic is willing to confront racism and class division. Predictably, the re-branded Republican Tea-Party has exploited these opportunities. Sure, Obama is more mainstream than progressive, but until liberals and progressives begin to aggressively stand up against racism, and for working class ideals like unions, we don't stand a chance against boisterous nonsensical Republican Tea Party rhetoric. We needed to push Obama to the left with our strength of conviction, rather than have fear, hatred and mis-information become a basis for new found right wing power.
09:19 AM on 11/04/2010
Obama can not do this alone. I cringe when I hear people state that he should communicate better. How about Bush, no communicator at all, but was elected for 8 years. The Republicans are all over the radio and msm, where is the support for Obama? At least, the Republicans do not make demands on their candidates, no matter the ignoranance level.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:53 PM on 11/04/2010
Wrong as it was, people understood Bush's message.

Obama cost us this election by not articulating a plan we could all get behind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:02 PM on 11/02/2010
Unfortunately, none of the things written in this article will be done. Pres. Obama has said that his path is going to continue to be one of compromise, even if they obstruct at every turn.

The next two years are not going to be pretty.
03:00 AM on 11/03/2010
You might also add, that most of this article is bunk. I stopped reading after the claims that the President didn't force the Republicans to read the phone book to filibuster. First, the President isn't in charge of the Senate and second thast whole standing on the floor reading the phone book hasn't been done since they changed the Senate rules in '75.

If you're going to make a point about the things you don't like about this administration, at least start off with some facts and the tiniest bit of knowledge on how the Government actually works.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:49 AM on 11/03/2010
Keep telling yourself that taddles. The filibuster is one part of this article, and the president could've told Reid to make them filibuster. He's the leader of his party, the leader of the free world, and the most powerful man in the world. To say he could not have forced the Senate to make good on their filibuster is hogwash. Just because it hasn't been done since 1975 doesn't mean that it cannot be done again. If you're going to use a historical timeline to justify not making the GOP actually follow through on a filibuster, you would rightly be against health care reform since the federal government refused to take this issue on in over 70 years.

Also, you are forgetting that it's not the actions that count right now. What counts is the message. The message has been dictated by the GOP, and they won. In politics, it's all about who can dictate the message and control the debate. Pres. Obama's first two years are abysmal because he, and our party leaders, failed to control the message being sent to Americans. If you control the message, you control the political debate, and this has been shown to be the case so many times that it is laughable to suggest otherwise.

How the gov't. works and facts are meaningless to Americans. Americans care about the message, and if Pres. Obama doesn't control it, unfortunately, he will lose.
photo
Rich Baska
BlueTrooth
01:02 PM on 11/02/2010
I'm not sure if I'm a "progressive" or not. Progressive has become an exclusive club, in my humble opinion. During the Health Care reform "debate", I was routinely chastised by the "progressives" for considering the "exchange" a reasonable alternative to the "public option" (which progressives failed miserably at detailing). I was ridiculed by progressives for suggesting the biggest victory in Health Care was establishing the "right" to affordable health insurance (even though my goal was Medicare for All). When the dust settles, it will be interesting to analyze whether it was Tea Party motivation, or Progressive suppression, that had the biggest impact on the midterms.
01:01 PM on 11/02/2010
I voted for President Obama, but I would be happier if I had a candidate I could "believe in" for 2012. I do know he will become extremely wealthy once he leaves office.
12:44 PM on 11/02/2010
Hey Stu, I hate to say this, but all you progressives should have seen this coming. You're a bunch of intelligent people who fell for somebody who looked and sounded like the real deal......but he did not have enough E X P E R I E N C E.

That Clinton that you said is doing a decent job as SOS, she would have killed as POTUS. People would be back to work by now. She would never have compromised on Healthcare. It's a shame.

HILLARY in 2012!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:28 AM on 11/04/2010
It has nothing to do with his experience, the problem, as many feared but hoped against, was that he would put bipartisanship above policy. It makes little sense to be bipartisan with a group of people who have demonstrated over several decades that they're concretely against building jobs in this country.
photo
TaurusRose
I.do.not.like.new.format
01:23 PM on 11/08/2010
It makes little sense to be bipartisan if that means giving up policy that is GOOD for our nation, but that is what BO did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lukester
12:07 PM on 11/02/2010
“This president feels flat — and somehow not quite genuine. He should place above his bed the words of Jonathan Alter: “Logic can convince but only emotion can motivate.”

On arriving in New York from London, I went to a party on the Upper East Side. It was a well-heeled crowd, almost all Obama supporters a couple of years back. “The guy’s a phony,” one guest said.”

Read more:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/02/opinion/02iht-edcohen.html?_r=1&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:31 AM on 11/04/2010
> “The guy’s a phony,” one guest said.”

Sadly, this is my gut reaction now whenever I hear him speak. Though I don't know if "phony" is the exactly right word; I just don't believe him anymore when he speaks of fighting back or for progressive causes.
photo
TaurusRose
I.do.not.like.new.format
01:25 PM on 11/08/2010
Truthfully. He has no substance. That is why he sounds flat and fails to convince.
11:45 AM on 11/02/2010
wow...powerful and sadly the utter truth.

you put into words what I and so many have been feeling and thinking for the past year.

I hope you send your letter to the President.
11:42 AM on 11/02/2010
Spot on!

(...except, I will not promise the President my vote in 2012, especially if a progressive fighter steps up to challenge him in the primaries.)