iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Subhankar Banerjee

Subhankar Banerjee

Posted: September 3, 2010 02:31 PM

Wednesday evening was the first (and perhaps the only) debate between Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) and her Republican challenger Carly Fiorina.

I'm not a guru of politics. I'm not a pundit of policy debates. I'm not a Beltway lobbyist. My knowledge of politics does not go beyond 101, those classes we take during our freshman college year. I live in New Mexico -- not California.

Yet, I care passionately about Senator Barbara Boxer's reelection. Why? Because I care deeply about life on Earth and I'm very concerned about climate crimes that are killing animals, birds, trees, and also humans in the U.S. as well as all over the world.

Soon I'll tell you about why we must help Senator Boxer's reelection campaign, no matter where in the U.S. we live, but first I'll share a story of how I came to know Senator Boxer.

2010-09-02-SenatorBoxerwithSubhankarPolarBearPhoto.jpg

March 19, 2003: I was living in Seattle. It must have been midday, when I got a call from Cindy Shogan, executive director of Alaska Wilderness League, a Washington-DC based non-profit organization. "Turn on your TV", said Cindy, "Senator Boxer is showing your polar bear photo on the Senate floor". She hung up, and I was nowhere near a TV. Later someone emailed me a screenshot from CSPAN -- Senator Boxer showing a poster-size image of one of my polar bear photos from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

That day Senator Boxer passionately argued to prevent oil drilling in the Arctic Refuge. President George W. Bush was pushing very hard to sell the Arctic Refuge to the oil companies. Cindy had brought some of my photos and a copy of my just published book, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land to Senator Boxer's attention. Cindy's hope was that it could help counter the arguments made by then Republican Senators Ted Stevens and Frank Murkowski, who had portrayed the Arctic Refuge as a "white nothingness" or "barren, frozen wasteland". Vice President Dick Cheney sat at his Senate office most of the day, expecting that the Senate would split the votes 50-50, he will break the tie, win the vote, and let the oilers move forward. To their dismay, Senator Boxer's passionate plea resulted in a 51-49 votes that day. Her use of my book and photos during the Senate debate, however, resulted in my soon to open exhibition at the Smithsonian Institution to turn into a political football. But that's another story. I slowly began to learn about American politics.

Later that year, the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco opened my Arctic Refuge exhibition. Senator Boxer attended the opening reception. She told us a story. On March 19, when she returned home later that evening, her granddaughter said, "I'm very proud of you grandma for protecting the polar bear." That day she indeed did. And she continues to be a champion of the Arctic Refuge, which is a crown jewel of America, and it is also the most biologically diverse conservation area in the entire Arctic. Later this year, on December 6, we will be celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. We must never sell the Arctic Refuge to the oil companies.

In 2007, Senator Barbara Boxer became the first woman ever to chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Fast forward to 2010. We had BP's unforgiveable oil-and-methane spill in the gulf, a disaster Jerry Cope and Charles Hambleton have called the crime of the century. Then on June 10, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski launched an attack to block Environmental Protection Agency's effort to limit greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Air Act. Senator Barbara Boxer made a passionate counter-attack. She showed poster-sized images of blackened birds killed by BP's spill. While showing the dead-bird photos, Senator Boxer said, "They're almost too painful. But for someone (Senator Lisa Murkowski) to come to this floor to say too much carbon is not dangerous, then I'm sorry, we'll have to look." Her passion prevailed and the Republican attempt was defeated by 53-47 votes.

Wednesday evening during the debate at Saint Mary's College, Senator Boxer talked about protecting the California coast from offshore oil-and-gas development (Carly Fiorina favors offshore development in California). On May 13, Senator Boxer and five senators from California, Oregon, and Washington introduced legislation to ban all future drilling along the Pacific shoreline.

Offshore oil development is a dirty and dangerous business. When something goes wrong it kills a helluva lot of marine life and also destroys people's way of life. Some Californians may remember very well the 1969 oil spill off of Santa Barbara coast that spewed 200,000 gallons of crude, and killed seals, dolphins, fish, birds, and other marine life.

I've been extremely concerned about offshore drilling in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas of arctic Alaska. To prevent a BP like catastrophe in the Arctic Ocean that Shell was just about to embark on this summer, I wrote a piece BPing the Arctic? on May 25. Two days later President Obama reversed his earlier decision and suspended Shell's drilling for 2010. We must put a permanent ban on offshore drilling in America's Arctic Ocean, the way Senator Boxer and her colleagues have proposed for the Pacific coast.

Resource expert Michael Klare has pointed out that most of the easy oil in North America has already been extracted. We're now going after what he calls extreme-energy with potentially devastating consequences -- offshore drilling in deepwater, offshore drilling in extremely harsh environment like the Arctic Ocean, or the Tar Sands of Alberta in Canada.

Senator Boxer is doing the right thing by protecting the coast of her home state from offshore drilling. It's time that we move away from the death grip of oil-and-coal and start a clean energy revolution in the U.S. During Wednesday evening's debate Senator Boxer also pointed out that her aim is to make California "a hub of clean energy industry". This is what all Americans need to hear. Clean energy is no longer an idea that has the promise to create new jobs. Elizabeth Lynch wrote recently in The Huffington Post that China has already beat the U.S. to become the new green tech giant. We need the same direction for U.S. -- it'll create new jobs, actually lot of new jobs, and help control global warming at the same time. For that we need Senator Barbara Barbara Boxer and not Carly Fiorina (whose sympathy is with the oil-and-coal companies).

After the U.S. Senate killed the climate bill in late July, many of us were disappointed (but not surprised). We pointed our fingers to what went wrong and why our climate movement failed, but then we got to work to figure out how to move forward. Just a few days ago I founded ClimateStoryTellers.org that you can check out. And for action you can check out great activist movements -- 350.org and the Climate Justice Network. Last year with a puny budget and a lot of passion, Bill McKibben and his compatriots at 350.org organized 5200 climate rallies in 181 countries. And this coming October they're planning Global Work Party -- 1400 events already planned in more than 135 countries. Our climate movement is moving forward with many new ideas, renewed energy, and enthusiasm.

And we need Senator Boxer with us on our new climate movement train. She is a champion of our environment and clean energy economy, and we must do everything to help her win reelection.

I'm with her.

Are you?

Subhankar Banerjee is a photographer, writer, activist, and founder of ClimateStoryTellers.org

[Edits/Corrections: replaced "Last night" with "Wednesday evening"; added url link to "California Academy of Science"; added one line, "In 2007, Senator Barbara Boxer became the first woman ever to chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee."]

 
 
 
Wednesday evening was the first (and perhaps the only) debate between Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) and her Republican challenger Carly Fiorina. I'm not a guru of politics. I'm not a pundit of...
Wednesday evening was the first (and perhaps the only) debate between Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) and her Republican challenger Carly Fiorina. I'm not a guru of politics. I'm not a pundit of...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 132
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:59 PM on 09/07/2010
Too bad Boxer and Feinstein's Big Money conservative "donors" won't allow them to support cannabis legalization, the most important issue for California.
07:25 PM on 09/06/2010
Watch Fiorina's insane TV ad attacking Boxer for being concerned about climate change:
http://youtu.be/F3opch_q4M0

Then watch this video for perspective on why this issue is so critical and why inaction is immoral:
http://youtu.be/PSip5sJQ0ak

Then vote for Boxer.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Subhankar Banerjee
07:53 PM on 09/06/2010
Thank you for posting these videos. They speak volume of the disaster we'll face if Carly Fiorina is elected. During the debate she did not even have a clear answer whether she even believes in global warming or not. Both the ecological and economic cost of ignoring climate change is going to be astronomical and it would be a crime if we leave that up to our future generation to deal with. Let's make 2010 Midterm Election all about "Clean Energy Revolution and Clean Energy Jobs".

California - Please get the facts and vote for Senator Barbara Boxer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:18 PM on 09/06/2010
Boxer has been in office way, way, way, too long. Time to turn the page and move on.
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
04:13 PM on 09/06/2010
BTW: Using Alaskan oil is carbon neutral, since it would only replace oil used from foreign suppliers.
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
04:11 PM on 09/06/2010
This is brain-dead politics at its worst. The 2 square mile area where they want to drill looks like the New Jersey Meadow Lands used to look before Giant Stadium was built there...terrible. Wildlife doesn't care about the pipeline. However, drilling on the small piece of land would create thousands of good paying jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Subhankar Banerjee
08:08 PM on 09/06/2010
The "small footprint" is a complete fallacy that pro-development politicians and oil companies have promoted to get into the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It is like saying we're only going to use 3 square inches if you let me use this photo tripod, in reality the tripod takes over actually several square foot not just the three square inches that are the bottom of its three legs. Oil development if allowed in the Arctic Refuge will spread the entire coastal plain not 2 square miles. For a detailed discussion of the "small footprint" broken promise you can check out this report from The Wilderness Society published last October - http://wilderness.org/content/broken-promises-reality-big-oil-americas-arctic

I'm proud that Senator Boxer has consistently stood up against her pro-oil colleagues in Senate and the oil companies to protect the Arctic Refuge. I think few Americans would disagree that it was a good idea to protect the Grand Canyon National Park even though at that time there was pressure to develop the area for copper mining.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:20 PM on 09/06/2010
Boxer is somewhat of a career politician. She needs to secure a job in the private sector and give others a chance.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
12:06 PM on 09/06/2010
If you elect the Carly-nator, you will get everything you could want in a right wing candidate. A person so powerful that she can destroy companies and shift jobs from country to country with a wink and a nod. Unfortunately, the companies she has helped demolish are the ones she worked for, and the jobs she shifted were American jobs going overseas.
Elect Carly Fiorina to the US Senate! That way we can help make sure that China gets our green jobs as well as our rust belt ones.

Let Lovely Carly Fiorina send your job to China!

If she has done it before, she can do it again!
06:48 PM on 09/06/2010
I'm not crazy about Boxer, but she is the lesser of the two evils. Vote for Boxer.
Likewise, for Brown. He is a known entity, however Whitman is scary. Vote for Brown.
01:46 AM on 09/06/2010
Your nuts. In case you havent heard, out country is in dire economic stress. Right now we cannot afford your green movement and ban oil and gas drilling. We cannot run our economy on solar and wind. I personally do not like to have to import our energy from the middle east and am not against using all these alternative energys for what they can provide BUT if you think we can get by without exploring for oil and gas off our shores, then maybe you would not mind living in a cave. Not very appealing to me.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:43 AM on 09/06/2010
"Right now we cannot afford... [to] ban oil and gas drilling."

We can't afford anymore economy crashing spills either.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
11:53 AM on 09/06/2010
But we can afford thousands of lives and trillions of dollars to guard our supplies of imported petroleum?

I have an idea, why don't we just keep driving trucks the size of my garage to transport ourselves to work. That will protect our little selves from all sorts of danger, expecially that of someone mistaking us for someone who can think. . Let's also, while we are at it, discourage solar and wind because the Koch brothers are not invested in those. And also, let's worship speed noise and burn up every last bit of petroleum that we can get our hands on! No use letting the grand kids have any of that stuff to play around with, I always say. Who knows what mischief they might get into if we left them any?

Oh yeah, I almost forgot. Prop 23 is not about banning oil and gas drilling. It is about rules that effect CO2 emissions. "Proposition 23 is a deceptive proposition bankrolled by Texas oil companies that will kill California's clean air and clean energy standards, resulting in more pollution." So basically you are teabagging in the wind.

Texas-Oil companies. You are one of their enablers. Aren't you......

Have a nice day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:36 AM on 09/06/2010
Well hopefully Boxer will lose.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:43 AM on 09/06/2010
"Well hopefully Boxer will lose."

Why?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:19 AM on 09/06/2010
She's an entrenched politician who needs to move on.
11:58 AM on 09/06/2010
If Boxer loses, California loses, and i ndeed, the whole country loses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 PM on 09/06/2010
Yeah, Okay. Fantasy. The country won't lose if Boxer loses. I think shes been in office too long and needs to move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lovetolast
No more hurting people. Peace.
11:31 PM on 09/05/2010
Lord...the tro//s are surely out tonight! Must be getting paid more chump change than usual today.

Listen, fellow Californians: we cannot afford to let the likes of Carly "I Screwwwed Over Hewlett Packard So PLEASE Let Me Screwww Over California" Fiorina become our next senator. Vote. It makes a difference!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
12:12 PM on 09/06/2010
Boxer's got my vote. She had my vote when soon after Deepwater Horizon exploded she joined with Pacific coast senators from WA and OR to ban new offshore drilling forever off our coasts. Boxer rocks! And agree - voting makes a difference. Especially in THIS election! F & F ☮
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veritas aequitas
07:43 PM on 09/05/2010
Some regulation is necessary.

All regulations cost jobs.

Demwits don't know when enough is enough.

We need conservatives in power to tell them.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:47 AM on 09/06/2010
"All regulations cost jobs."

I guess you could consider hospital care for the injured and environmental cleanup gained jobs, but having sensible regulations makes jobs for people who monitor and report of safety and pollution. It is a net gain.

What unregulated industry do you work in?
07:40 PM on 09/05/2010
She and Feinstein lost me and my friends when she went against cannabis legalization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lovetolast
No more hurting people. Peace.
11:25 PM on 09/05/2010
What does that mean for you in the race between Boxer and fiorina?
04:04 PM on 09/07/2010
It means that as always, Big conservative Money decides who "wins", not the majority.
12:04 PM on 09/06/2010
Cannabis legalization is not the most important issue right now.
Don't be a one-issue voter. That is self defeating.
01:57 PM on 09/06/2010
What can possibly be more important than cannabis legalization?
photo
tnkeating
Dyslexic agnostic insomniac
07:38 PM on 09/05/2010
While I have mixed feelings about drill baby drill, I don't think we should be dependent on foriegn oil and common sense tells me that wind and solar is not efficient enough yet and can't be developed fast enough to take up the slack for oil, neither can nuclear. I do support all of those but oil is needed untill we can eliminate cars that run on gasoline. That said Ms. Boxer is much more the problem then the cure, I wouldn't trust her as far as I could throw her. It seems to me she has been involved in scam after scam, it make me wonder just what shes invested in, no doubt energy. I'd rather elect a polar bear than Ms. Boxer, there brains probably not as big but they take better care of their young and can smell a rat two miles away
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lovetolast
No more hurting people. Peace.
11:26 PM on 09/05/2010
What scams, sweetie?
12:06 PM on 09/06/2010
Consider the alternative.
06:21 PM on 09/05/2010
Sorry, but I can't resist a rant here:

I am so sick of ignorant pseudo-environmentalist politicians and the people who support them!

Barbara Boxer has spent her senate career bouncing from one idiotic energy fad or scam to aother. She promoted fuel cell cars, which any competent junior high school student knows is not viable economically or environementally. She supported the atrocious Renewable Fuel Standard, which mandates the systematic poisoning od the Gulf of Mexico, the depletion of the Oglalla aquifer, inflating food prices, and increasing green house gasses. She supported Harry Reid's scam to build a high speed rail lline from Anaheim to Las Vegas, while ignoring the need for a line in the Northeast. Her talk about "green energy jobs" is just one more scam, as anyboy who can do simple arithmetic knows.

Yet she gains support because she poses in font of a picture of polar bears. Would you Californians even consider electing her if her policies poisoned San Francisco Bay rather than the Gulf of Mexico?

I could go on and explain my points so that even a Californian could understand them, but I'm too disgusted.

(By the way, I lived in California most of my life, and I liked it much more when everybody took hallucenogenics. At least then people had some grasp of reality.)
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:53 AM on 09/06/2010
I see, Boxer isn't environmental enough for you. How is Fliorina better?
01:16 PM on 09/06/2010
Fiorina is better a critical thought and is more responsible than Boxer.

I have no problem with a California politician who opposes drilling offshore California and opposes poisoning the Gulf of Mexico with misguided ethanol manates and subsidies. I have a small problem with a California politician who supports drilling offshore California and supports ethanol mandates and subsidies. I have a huge problem with a California politician who opposes drilling offshore California but supports ethanol mandates and subsidies, as Boxer does.

I also have a problem with those who support politicians of her ilk and consider themselves to be environmentalists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
03:23 PM on 09/05/2010
Watching Barbara Boxer on C-SPAN 03-21-2007 attempt to allow Al Gore a chance to respond to the obvious efforts of Oklahoma's US Senator Inholf not to allow a response is all I need to see that she has concerns about fairness and the environment that her opponent doesn't.

Please California. Don't send a CEO to Washington who laid off thousands at HP, then sent their jobs to China, and took an undeserving $100 million dollar golden parachute retirement for her incompetent leadership. She will cost America more jobs than what she deleted at HP.
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
08:50 AM on 09/05/2010
I'm with her, Are you?

Like about half of her constituent's, I am not. Her time is up.

face it.
12:49 AM on 09/05/2010
I am almost at the point of putting Boxer in a category of being there too long. I will give the thugs credit in actually primarying people. We have gotten some special people though!!!

Boxer is an amazing, and bright woman, but is playing a game. I hope she gets back to being her fiery self if she gets re-elected. She isn't listened to a lot, and should be. She is great for CA in my mind, and for the environment. If there is frustration, especially in CA, I do not feel she is to blame. Fiorina is another crazy criminal who shouldn't be allowed to even run. I'll stick with Boxer any day.