The Honorable Jim Douglas
Governor of Vermont
109 State Street, Pavilion
Montpelier, VT 05609-010
Dear Governor Douglas,
Fifteen years ago, my husband Tom and I bought our house in Thetford, Vermont, partly for the spectacular view of the mountains across the Connecticut River in New Hampshire, but mainly because we already had a wonderful community of close friends there. A number of them happen to be lesbians, living in committed relationships like our own.
My parents, who live in Colorado, came to know them and would see them on their visits here and ask after them in our phone conversations. Although my folks knew that our friends Annelise and Alexis lived together as a couple, when I called them excitedly one day, in 1996, to announce that Alexis was going to have a baby, my mother's bewildered response was, "Oh? I didn't even know she was married!"
I shouldn't have been surprised. My mother had been raised to believe that homosexuality was a sin, but she, like my father, had come to not only accept, but love, our lesbian friends. Which is not to say that she wasn't occasionally a little confused, but, after a brief conversation about sperm donors and artificial insemination, the next thing I knew, she was making a baby quilt for Alexis and Annelise's daughter, Evann. A few years later, when Annelise became pregnant with their second child, she made another baby quilt. And she made two more around that time, for babies of other lesbian friends.
Our son, Gabriel, who is now fourteen, spent so much time with these kids that one day when he was four or five he asked me, with genuine puzzlement, "How come I don't have two moms?" He was too young to be involved in the Vermont marriage debates a decade ago, but he's keenly interested in civil rights these days, so he joined me and some one thousand Vermonters at the statehouse in Montpelier on March 18 to attend the public hearings on the marriage equality bill before the Vermont legislature.
We heard Evann, now twelve, testify in favor of the bill that would give her parents the right to get married: "It hurts me sometimes when I feel invisible, because few people understand my feelings about my family, and few people want to ask about families with two moms. It's time to ask. It's time to understand. And it's time to accept and honor families like mine." We heard Evann's mom, Alexis, testify that it comes down to "what's best for the kids. And when you really think about it, why is it better for the children of gay and lesbian parents to be less secure, financially and legally, than other kids?" And we heard many Vermonters, gay and straight, with kids and without kids, argue that everyone should have full civil rights, that no one should any longer be treated like a second-class citizen.
As you know, a few days later, the Vermont senate voted 26-4 for the marriage equality bill and it was sent to the house where it stood an excellent chance of passing. But the next day, you announced you would veto the bill--the first time in your tenure that you've threatened to veto a bill before the entire legislature voted on it. In the press release announcing your intention to veto the bill, you said: "I respect the passionate opinions of individuals on both sides of this debate and hope that when the Legislature makes their decision, whatever the outcome may be, we can move our state forward, toward a bright future for our children and grandchildren."
Governor Douglas, if you truly respect all Vermonters, I urge you to honor the votes of our elected representatives when they make "their decision." Don't veto the bill. Allow it to become law, free the legislature to move on to other urgent tasks, and let the families of our gay and lesbian friends and neighbors enjoy all the civil rights you and I already enjoy. Our state is well on its way toward to that bright future all our children and grandchildren deserve. All you need to do is not hold us back.
Sincerely,
Susan Brison
I do disagree with Susan about "no one should any longer be treated like a second-class citizen" - a 2nd class citizen would not have their child taken away after a funeral or be denied a spouse's pension once widowed. Naw - that's more like a 3rd or 4th class; we are SOCIAL LEPERS in the eyes of the law. Worse our children's rights are only as good as our rights.
I disagree with my Q community when it comes to raising money for rights, which seems like victimhood embraced. I don't think spending money to purchase a civil right is "active" enough - it seems like a passive response to INJUSTICE. Like a child paying off a bully. Withholding spending, or diverting spending, whether a boycott or tax revolt, is an ACTIVE response - a fighting response. Victims allow society to vote FOR or AGAINST their own family. (my god, I would NEVER agree to vote against someone's family - we were complicit). We cannot demand anything without wielding SOME KIND of
(there - I got in all in!)
You have the power to veto marriage equality, and gays and lesbians NATIONWIDE have the power to raise UNIMAGINABLE sums of money to have you beaten in the next election in either a primary or general election.. SERIOUSLY, if you are observing prop 8 battle, I think it's safe to say, my community is in NO MOOD to be jerked around, do so at the peril of your political career.
Right now I'm in a round about email exchange with one of the prime members of the God Squad, the Rev. John Codega of Christ the Redeemer Church in West Warwick, RI. He's an advisory member to the National Organization for Marriage RI. So too is Bishop Tobin.
http://truthspew.wordpress.com
But I like BoyInBOYCOTT's suggestion since the religious have seen fit to raise money from elsewhere in the country to deny my rights here in RI. If I have the cash I'd be willing to chip in to defeat the governor come next election cycle. That's the thing, Republicans need to be taught that there are consequences for their actions.