More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Susan Ochshorn

GET UPDATES FROM Susan Ochshorn
 

Ed Reform Cuomo-Style: Where's the Foundation?

Posted: 01/06/12 10:53 AM ET

"Jobs, jobs, jobs" is the Governor's mantra, the take-away from his State of the State. And who can blame him? New York, like the rest of the nation, is hurting, and pain relief is a must -- especially for a state CEO with presidential aspirations. Road work, casinos, a mega convention center, a billion to Buffalo, one of the nation's most impoverished cities. Bricks and mortar are tangible, and economic incentives, encouraging. To drive home the message, Cuomo's email arrived, like clockwork, at 7:30, the morning after his address. "Building a new New York ... with you," he reminded me, just in case I had missed the metaphor the day before. But where, oh where, was the foundation?

"The future of our state depends on our public schools," the Governor said, an effective school system "the hallmark of a healthy democracy." He talked about "re-imagining government," and declared public education a "Priority Mission." He announced the formation of yet another education commission to "change the paradigm," zeroing in on teacher accountability and student achievement and management efficiency. (What's new about that?) Finally, he anointed himself the "lobbyist for students," who, unlike, superintendents, principals, teachers, school boards, and bus drivers, he asserted, have no one to defend their interests.

Soaring rhetoric is nice, if not the corporate analogies, but with all due respect to the Governor, who has acquitted himself reasonably well in his first year of office, we can't build a world-class education system without a foundation. If he takes his lobbying seriously, not to mention the future of the state's economy and well-being, he needs to start early, with our youngest students. Here, in early childhood -- from birth until age 8 -- is where learning begins, and where, a voluminous amount of research tells us, the achievement gap is born.

New York, alas, has run into a number of glitches on its multi-year work project of early learning system-building. A pioneer in establishing universal prekindergarten -- Republican governor George Pataki signed off on legislation in 1997 -- the state, nonetheless, has been developmentally delayed, lagging behind other innovative system-builders across the nation. So it was with great glee that early childhood advocates greeted Cuomo's announcement, last summer, of New York's intention to compete for up to $100 million in the federal Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) . And satisfaction was high, last fall, as New York submitted its application to the U.S Department of Education, along with 35 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. When the winners were announced, just before Christmas, New York, however, was not to be found among them. Disappointment settled in across the state.

I've always admired, from afar, the governors of others states, including North Carolina's Jim Hunt and New Hampshire's Jeanne Shaheen, who understood the link between early education and economic development -- even before James Heckman put his Nobel prize-winning expertise in labor economics to work for the cause. Hunt was the architect of Smart Start, a public-private partnership that, for two decades, has been supporting the health, care, development, and education of children birth to five. Shaheen, now a U.S. Senator, formed Business Partners for Early Learning in her state during her tenure as governor. And as chair of the Education Commission of the States, from 2000-2001, she made early childhood education her priority, paving the way for today's "cradle-to-career" policy framework.

North Carolina, which has been battling in our chilly economic climes to sustain their golden enterprise, won a federal grant. But there's no time to waste in RTT-ELC envy. New York, in this loss, has gained an opportunity. Cuomo spoke proudly, in his address, of New York's history of progressivism, to which he has contributed with his legalization of gay marriage and his willingness to tamper -- if modestly -- with the tax code. The man has a gift for bringing together strange bedfellows, fostering the kind of public-private collaboration and investment that he cites as a sure-fire strategy for getting the job done. New York's early childhood cognoscenti, in the race for federal funding, have moved the state forward, creating a blueprint for a viable early learning system.

Carpe diem, Governor. Ignore early childhood and the rest of the edifice crumbles.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
zippy335
It's only hypocrisy if someone else does it.
11:38 AM on 01/18/2012
Cuomo's always talking about "teacher" accountability, but fails to realize that what is truly lacking in schools is genuine "student" accountability.
06:53 PM on 01/07/2012
He announced the formation of yet another education commission to "change the paradigm," zeroing in on teacher accountability and student achievement and management efficiency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If external experts, academics, think-tanks, politicians, managers and test designers could improve education then the American educational system would be totally fantastic.

So, why isn't it?
02:10 PM on 01/07/2012
Education is so broken that no amount of tinkering will fix it. The world has changed, but education remains stuck in the box of yesteryear. I have a theory, developed over many years of personal experience, that the current educational structure, from the classroom to the boardroom, only recognizes one type of composite student. The entire system is devoted to that idealized student profile and all variations that do not fit the model are ignored (failed). Respect for individuality, uniqueness of abilities, personality variations or personal goals or qualities of potentials are ignored in favor of easily tabulated goals that serve some external political purpose. Students must adapt to the system because the system will not adapt to the student. What is lost is the promise that cannot be tabulated---genius.

This 'in the box' reality serves no one, but is supported and sustained by academics and politicos who themselves were 'in the box' students and thinkers. When I look back at my degrees and classes, I have to ask myself, "What was the point of all that?" Except for a few magic moments of real teaching, I can't think of anything that could be termed as education.

Reform is necessary, but we must first take a good look at the farce that we call education.
06:59 PM on 01/07/2012
Listen to the street. Smash the schools! The institution of the modern school was developed to meet the needs of the industrial age. Now we are in postmodernity and the post-industrial age. Society advanced democracy through modernity. Now it is education's turn. Democratize the schools. Disempower all external agents of influence. Let children learn through managing their own institutions and learning.

Crazy. yes. Crazy like freeing the slaves and giving women the vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
10:24 AM on 01/08/2012
Exactly- what DO we want our children as students to know going forward into this century?

And, at what ages? The most basic is to be able to understand and decode words, numbers, and to know their meanings and values, IMO. The ability to read is what's needed, not merely to copy.

Without that education in the basic grades, everything that follows is meaningless.
11:59 AM on 01/08/2012
I read some of your comments and understand where you are coming from. Students, and people in general, are not uniform. We all have strengths and weaknesses. There are what I would call standard types that make up the predictable majority. Then there are creative types whose talents lead in innovation and breakthrough concepts. At the edges there are special needs people who don't seem to fit in anywhere. Only standard types fit into the modern classroom. How can education meet the needs of all types? It can respect differences and honor uncommon potentials. For instance, my cousin was totally unable to function in the classroom. Most would have labeled him retarded, or as we say now, special needs. However, he was an absolute wizard when it came to electronics. He got it. He was brilliant at it. He just couldn't learn normal things in a normal way.

As you struggle to teach normal things to special people, please remember that words are important, but reading and writing are not the only portal to potential. College should be accessible to all, but college is deeply flawed as well because it standardizes knowledge for the standard types and doesn't respect the individual potential. There are solutions, but education isn't interested. This will change.