More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Susan Savage
 

We're All On the Same Page!

Posted: 11/20/07 12:11 PM ET

I received an angry email from a friend of mine, who's a Steadicam operator, in response to my last post. He tells me "Very few (below the line) people in our business get Residual Income (actors, writers...who else?). The rest of us slug it out on an hourly basis, and if we don't get the hours - we're screwed!" I have several friends who are currently working on TV shows, and they are upset, and rightly so about the possibility of lost wages due to a strike. They're equally concerned about the real fear of potentially losing their health insurance as it is directly tied into their days worked. I understand they might feel caught in the cross fires of a strike that they perceive is not their issue.

But is that true? Really? It's not their issue because they don't get residuals, right? Wrong! While they don't get an actual residual check like writers, actors, and directors, they do get a tremendous and direct benefit from residuals. If you pick up a copy of the general memorandum of agreement of Aug. 1, 2006 between AMPTP and I.A.T.S.E, the Moving Pictures Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the US and Canada, you will see inherent in their collective bargaining agreement with the AMPTP clearly outlines that the members of these unions get a piece of residuals too. It's more than a piece actually, and I'm happy to elaborate.

The WGA has done extensive research on the subject, so feel free to log-on to their website for more information @ www.wga.org . So here's where YOUR residual payments go. Under the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiated between the AMPTP and the following unions: I.A.T.S.E, IBT Local 399, Studio Utility Employees Local 724, IBEW Local 40, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 78, Plasters & Cement Masons Local 755, residuals from the reuse and sale of TV and feature films are paid into your pension and health plans.

According the WGA's handout, these payments comprise a majority of the total funding for your pension & health plans, and here's how the numbers break down,

From January 1, 2007 - September 1, 2007 residual contributions to the pension & health plans totaled $261 Million Dollars.

Projected residual contributions for 2007: $351 Million Dollars

Total P&H contributions from residuals in 2006: $339 Million Dollars

Total P&H contributions from residuals in 2005: $348 Million Dollars


Still think this is not your cause, my friend?

If you are a member of I.A.T.S.E, Teamsters Local 399 or the Basic Crafts, you work under a pension & health plan that is entirely funded by your employer.

Again, I cite the WGA's information, but if you don't believe this or me, then may I suggest you call the Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans directly @ 310-769-0007. Because unlike the AMPTP's ad in the LA Times and the NY Times last Friday, the WGA isn't distorting the numbers. "The AMPTP uses numbers the way a drunk uses a lamppost - more for support than illumination." So make the call and decide for yourself, who's giving you the facts and who's giving you the distortions.

In 2006, residuals accounted for 55% of total pension & health plan contributions. The remaining 45% of P&H contributions came from your employers who contribute a fixed percent on your behalf from every hour you work. This means that more money is being contributed to P&H from residuals than from actual hours of work. If there are funding surpluses from residuals, retirees receive a 13th & 14th check (instead of the 12 normally paid in a year.) Ask any retiree! Monies paid in the form of residuals will provide the MAJORITY of your pension when you retire. But don't take my word for it or the WGA's word, call the Motion Picture Industry P&H and ask them yourself. 310-769-0007

So if the Writers get residuals on the internet, then you, and all of the unions mentioned above will get residuals on the internet too!

This strike is not just about writers; it's about all of us. Or at least anyone who wants to make a living in this business. And as my dear, but angry friend of 20 years said, "There would be no film or television if ANY of our crafts (camera, electric, wardrobe, hair & makeup, etc. etc.) were eliminated from the business." And I agree with him. A 100%! But I would also say to my friend, there would be nothing for him to shoot, and nothing for me to say, if not for writers. There would be no stories without them, and hence, no work for any of us without writers.

To my dear friends, who are described as "below the line" crew members.... Elisabeth, Peter, Bob, Jim, Annette, Chris, Tim, Ashton, and Tom, the writers may create the films and the TV shows we all work on, but without you, the world they've created would still just be on paper. Thank you for your hard work, your understanding, your patience, and your support!

In solidarity and hope,

Susan Savage

Actress,

Screen Actors Guild

National Board member

Read more about the strike on the Huffington Post's writers' strike page.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:58 AM on 11/21/2007
If you guys were producing something I cared about or used I might be concerned. But TV. It's just so much garbage. I thought Stewart
and Colbert wrote their own stuff. Now I know
they are just talking heads delivering other's
words I'll never watch them again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxZook
Convincing people not to vote for Republicans
01:43 PM on 11/20/2007
You're absolutely right that "below-the-line" workers employed under the IATSE and Basic Crafts agreements get residuals paid into their benefit plan.

"So if the Writers get residuals on the internet, then you, and all of the unions mentioned above will get residuals on the internet too!"

No, they won't. The Writers Guild isn't on strike to increase the IA's residuals, or SAG's -- only their own. Even in the unlikely event that the WGA gets 100% of what they want, the rest of unionized Hollywood won't get the same deal automatically. Sorry, but that's as naive as assuming that once one actor negotiates a great deal, every other actor will get the same.

And as you say, for IA members to collect their residuals, they have to be *working* -- which a lot less of them will be, the longer the WGA stays out.
01:11 PM on 11/20/2007
You're making the assumption that everyone would rather sacrifice in the short term for what you believe will be long term benefits. That's not necessarily the case. Depending on a person's situation, a few extra dollars in their pension payments years from now will not make up for the chaos and financial hardship caused by being out of work right now. For you that trade off may make sense but for many, especially below the line workers, it doesn't. And it won't...no matter how many times you or other striking writers argue your case. Failing to take into account that there are a lot of workers out there with different needs and priorities is myopic. The fantasy of a united front is lovely but it's a fantasy.
12:47 PM on 11/20/2007
Well said. It was many years ago that painters went hungry while those who "invested" in their works benefitted for a simple purchase. Congress changed that and now a painter gets a piece of the encrease when a painting is resold. Art is not a widget and neither is writing. Thanks for the article.

Ray Evans Harrell