Veterans Respond to McCain's "Obama Wants to Lose" Remark
This type of insulting nonsense will not go unnoticed or unchallenged by the Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who've fought in both McCain's war in Iraq, and in the other war in Afghanistan.
This type of insulting nonsense will not go unnoticed or unchallenged by the Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who've fought in both McCain's war in Iraq, and in the other war in Afghanistan.
Both candidates are embracing, rather than challenging, the fundamental irrationality of Bush's "war on terror," which substitutes hysteria for rational analysis in appraising the dangers the country faces.
Berating women who are still supporting for vice president a candidate who won half the Democratic presidential nominee votes is not the way to persuade them to support Obama.
Our military officials felt brave enough to send our troops into battle, and yet not one of them has the strength of character to look Pat's mother, Mary Tillman, in the face, and say they are sorry.
Don't keep insisting to the Arabs that you're not a Muslim. They already know that, and they don't care.
Let's call these missions what they are: photo ops and ways of gathering impressions, opinions, and assumptions from various sources on the ground. Let's leave the fact-finding to Google.
Be careful what you wish for, John. That seems to be the message of the week for Senator John McCain. He took some campaign consultant's idea a few w...
Obama's Afghan appearance won't stop the criticism from foes that he doesn't know enough about fighting and winning a war, and that his credential as a tough guy on the war against terrorism is suspect.
Both Obama and McCain are advocating the exact same "solution" in Afghanistan: more troops -- Yet sending more troops will only mean more violence. And it's also not enough to simply say "Troops Out Now."
With the eyes of the world, and the U.S. media, trained intently on Obama during his week-long tour of the Middle East and Europe, for McCain, there is the question of what to do while all this is going on.
Seeing Obama in front of American troops at Bagram is not only a great relief (and, hopefully, a preview), it offers a profound contrast with what we've been suffering from.
It is one thing to masterfully run a primary campaign, and quite another to travel to three of the world's hottest conflict zones, each with its own unique challenges.
The presumptive Democratic nominee's world tour etablished that Obama has the gravitas to become President of the United States and neutralized McCain's national security credentials.
While sharing a similar ideology, al-Qa'eda and the Taliban are fundamentally distinct entities. It would behoove Sen. Obama, and his Republican counterpart, to explain exactly who the "Taliban" are they plan to fight.
A few hours into his journey to the two key lands occupied by American troops, Barack Obama is feeling the love. Indeed, it seems as if leaders in bo...
Bush and McCain had barely completed even one Iraq victory lap singing hosannas to the surge when they were obliged to begin thinking and talking about how they're going to shore up a failing policy in Afghanistan.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Zbig is someone I might listen to ...
Let's be even more practical and recognize as we are bogged down in the Middle East our geopolitical and economic competitors get stronger ... empowering Iran is the obvious one, but the EU, China, Russia, India, and countries of Latin American have also benefited for the US being trapped in the Mesopotamian Tar Pit ... If we want to toil in the Middle East for the next hundred years I'm sure the rest of the world will oblige us.
HE IS RIGHT. BUT THE PROBLEM IS THAT MOST AMERICANS DON'T DO ANALYTIC THINKING. WHEN THEY FIND SOMETHING BRAINY 'AND DIFFICULT TO DISCERN THEY JUST REJECT AND ATTACK. MOST PEOPLE STILL BELIEVE THAT IRAQ WAS A SUPERPOWER, LIKE RUSSIA OR CHINA BECAUSE THEY WERE SUBTLETY TOLD IT BY THE WAR MONGERS. FOR THE RECORD IRAQ WAS AND STILL IS A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY.
Just remember that one-half of the population has an IQ of less than 100. Fifty-percent are to the left of the bell-shaped curve, plus they are ignorant, having had little, if any education . To make matters worse, they are slow learners. Therefore, "you can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time......." Since many Americans spend all their time watching a television set and little, if any time reading books, and they don't really care very much...it appears to be a hopeless mess.
Going to war has such a macho ring to it. Peace sounds like a weakling's game. America's want a macho image. Having a brain or being educated is for "intellectuals."
"I don't know how WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Einstein
these desperate people who want to start wwIV, call it 4 because they consider the cold war WWIII
so you might have to update einstein's old comment:
The NeoCons want to reclassify the Cold War as WWIII because they want to feel they were part of something bigger than they were ... we are still awaiting WWIII.
I thought BO wants to send more troops to Afganistan? Isn't he going to take many from Iraq and send the Afganistan?
Meeka's daddy seems to be speaking against BO. .. well well
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in