Scalia Misquoted On Brown v. Board Of Education (CORRECTED)
CORRECTION: An item posted here -- reporting that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that if he were on the court in 1954, he would have dissen...
CORRECTION: An item posted here -- reporting that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that if he were on the court in 1954, he would have dissen...
Kenneth C. Davis | Posted 10.12.2009 | Politics
The litany of sectarian killings that has been such a grotesque piece of America's "hidden history" is the reason that some of the Framers thought the First Amendment was so necessary.
Geoffrey R. Stone | Posted 10.09.2009 | Politics
Justice Scalia takes umbrage at the suggestion that an eight-foot-high Christian cross, erected as a memorial to soldiers killed in military service, violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
David Weinberger | Posted 10.08.2009 | Politics
Justice Scalia is right that it's intended to honor all the war dead. The problem is the assumption that you honor all war dead by putting up the religious symbols honored by some.
Jeff Schweitzer | Posted 10.09.2009 | Politics
If a Christian would not select a Star of David then why on earth would a Jew choose a cross? Yet that is exactly what Scalia proposes. The notion that the cross represents everybody is bizarre.
AP | MARK SHERMAN | Posted 10.08.2009 | Politics
WASHINGTON — As the Supreme Court weighed a dispute over a religious symbol on public land Wednesday, Justice Antonin Scalia was having difficul...
AP | Posted 10.04.2009 | Home
WASHINGTON — An American cardinal on Sunday issued a plea for the rights of the unborn at a church service that included Vice President Joe Bide...
Carl Pope | Posted 09.14.2009 | Politics
Will the Supreme Court overturn 102 years of precedent and rule that corporations have the same right to spend money to influence elections that citizens possess?
Newsweek | Howard Fineman | Posted 09.14.2009 | Politics
Less than two weeks ago, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens made news in a typically elliptical court way. He announced that he had hired only on...
True Slant | Kate Klonick | Posted 11.10.2009 | Politics
Yesterday marked the first case in front of newly-minted Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the Court spared no controversy. The case, Citizens United v. F...
AP | MARK SHERMAN | Posted 11.09.2009 | Politics
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday it may let businesses and unions spend freely to help their favored candidates in time for nex...
Geoffrey R. Stone | Posted 09.28.2009 | Home
Does the religion of the justices in any way matter to the business of the Supreme Court? During Sotomayor's confirmation hearings, her faith was largely backgrounded, as if being Latina matters but being Catholic doesn't.
Tina Dupuy | Posted 09.21.2009 | Politics
Illegal is not the same as immoral. Jaywalking is illegal, few would argue it's immoral. What lawmakers, banks and brokers did to the economy was technically legal -- but it was far from being moral.
John Maki | Posted 09.20.2009 | Chicago
You might think that judges would be willing to review convictions based on testimony that was later recanted, but in fact courts frequently ignore recantations.
Donnie Fowler | Posted 08.15.2009 | Politics
What they say: Republicans say they hate government but also claim to be strict constructionists when it comes to the Constitution, but when it comes ...
Lincoln Mitchell | Posted 08.15.2009 | Politics
Asserting that a judge's background and experience influence their decision is not unlike asserting that the Pacific Ocean is wet.
Nathaniel Frank | Posted 08.14.2009 | Politics
The implication of Sessions' inquisition was that, as a white male with no distinguishing "heritage" to speak of, he and his ilk can make judgments totally free of feelings, belief, or experience.
Nan Aron | Posted 08.10.2009 | Politics
In Ricci v. DeStefano, the five conservatives on the Supreme Court struck a blow against this nation's most effective weapon for eliminating discrimination from our workplaces.
Gary S. Chafetz | Posted 07.23.2009 | Politics
Essentially, honest-services fraud makes prosecutors omnipotent, because they can charge anybody they want with a federal felony.
Geoffrey R. Stone | Posted 07.04.2009 | Politics
The focus instead should be on Sotomayor's intellectual ability, her judicial philosophy, and the nature and quality of her legal experience. But life experience isn't irrelevant.
Andy Ostroy | Posted 07.01.2009 | Politics
It's been utterly fascinating to witness the speed and consistency of the vitriol heaped on Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's choice for the United States Supreme Court.
HuffingtonPost.com | Jason Linkins | Posted 06.29.2009 | Media
I don't think I mentioned it previously, but when President Barack Obama announced that he would be submitting Second Circuit Court of Appeals Judge S...
Karl Frisch | Posted 06.29.2009 | Media
The Right's reaction to Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comment shows that numerous conservatives in the media have savaged her as a racist and a bigot.
Stanley Kutler | Posted 06.29.2009 | Politics
Sotomayor has the "right" gender, ethnicity, and experience; nevertheless, we can expect the Republicans to mount an "ideological" opposition.
Daniel Cubias | Posted 06.28.2009 | Politics
In the spirit of bipartisanship, I offer the following: Drop the lame attacks on Sonia Sotomayor, because they're not going to work.
Posted 10.27.2009 | Politics