Political Parties Are Not "Checks" Or "Balances"
I'm not worried about whether checks and balances will disappear if Republicans don't have more than 40 seats in the Senate. True checks and balances are more fundamental than party affiliation.
I'm not worried about whether checks and balances will disappear if Republicans don't have more than 40 seats in the Senate. True checks and balances are more fundamental than party affiliation.
HuffingtonPost.com | Sam Stein | Posted 12.22.2008 | Politics
The pressures of the runoff election and the continuing questions about his ties to a large, scandal-scarred sugar company seem to be getting to Sen. ...
Lance Simmens | Posted 12.15.2008 | Politics
Sometimes individuals are humbled by defeat, other times they are hardened by it. I had hoped that in McCain's case the former would apply, it seems not to be the case.
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.11.2008 | Politics
We have had a virtual news blackout on what is going on in the two states we're waiting for -- Missouri's presidential results, and Alaska's senatorial results. Here is what I managed to find out.
Atlanta Journal Constitution | Posted 12.06.2008 | Politics
Georgia's U.S. Senate race remained in doubt Wednesday morning as neither major party candidate had more than 50 percent of the vote. Incumbent U.S. ...
Chris Weigant | Posted 01.01.2009 | Politics