Political Parties Are Not "Checks" Or "Balances"
I'm not worried about whether checks and balances will disappear if Republicans don't have more than 40 seats in the Senate. True checks and balances are more fundamental than party affiliation.
I'm not worried about whether checks and balances will disappear if Republicans don't have more than 40 seats in the Senate. True checks and balances are more fundamental than party affiliation.
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.27.2008 | Politics
For only the third time in this column's two-and-a-half year history (see note below), I am turning over my soapbox to a guest columnist. As with bot...
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.25.2008 | Politics
The loopholes which allow such corporate excess were not exactly handed down to Moses on tablets -- each and every loophole was approved by Congress.
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.22.2008 | Politics
While today is not officially Turkey Day, I will warn you in advance that it's going to be a theme running through today's column, like gravy through ...
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.20.2008 | Politics
You've got to ask yourself -- why is this the only story that has leaked in this fashion from the transition team?
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.18.2008 | Politics
I'm on a lot of strange press lists, so I get a lot of strange press releases, but this is the first time I've ever gotten one from another dimension, I have to admit.
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.15.2008 | Politics
I have to begin here today by stomping all over a cutesy term the media has come up with for the upcoming economic "summit" George W. Bush is holding ...
Chris Weigant | Posted 12.13.2008 | Politics
Emails saying absolutely anything about a candidate could not only be sent anonymously, but whoever sends them would actually be allowed to break any sort of anti-spam laws to do so.
Chris Weigant | Posted 01.01.2009 | Politics