Why Corporations Shouldn't Play in Elections
Allowing huge corporations or wealthy tycoons to purchase political outcomes makes a mockery of the principle behind one person, one vote.
Allowing huge corporations or wealthy tycoons to purchase political outcomes makes a mockery of the principle behind one person, one vote.
Andrew Reinbach | Posted 11.11.2009 | Politics
You have to wonder whether the Justices are in the service of powers determined to remake America to their advantage, or if they respect themselves and want to make good law.
True Slant | Kate Klonick | Posted 11.10.2009 | Politics
Yesterday marked the first case in front of newly-minted Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the Court spared no controversy. The case, Citizens United v. F...
AP | MARK SHERMAN | Posted 11.09.2009 | Politics
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday it may let businesses and unions spend freely to help their favored candidates in time for nex...
Washington Independent | Daphne Eviatar | Posted 10.19.2009 | Politics
The upcoming re-argument of the case of Citizens United v. FEC, challenging corporate contributions to the financing of Hillary: The Movie, is raising...
Doug Kendall | Posted 10.17.2009 | Politics
The Supreme Court will break up its summer recess to hear arguments in Citizens United v. FEC, over Hillary: The Movie. You may sense something important is going on. If so, you're right.
Elliot Tarloff | Posted 07.28.2009 | Politics
In recent cases, the Court has indicated that it will follow an approach that can best be characterized either as minimalism or as an incrementalist approach to ultimately transformative goals.
Adam Lioz | Posted 11.12.2009 | Politics