The Businessweek cover plays into a long-standing trope that portrays borrowers of color as having caused the crisis because they supposedly took out loans they knew they could never repay. The only thing wrong with it is that it has no basis in fact.
The reason why the government stands behind the banks and insures them is because they are integral to our communities' growth and progress. If the banks turn their back on those communities, they have gotten away from their core purpose and do us all a grave disservice.
Another Big Lie circulating among conservatives is the belief that the Wall Street meltdown was caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Community Re...
BOWIE, Md. -- In the spring of 2007, a few months after Osita Otigba and his wife, Peace, moved to Balk Hill, a new subdivision then being busily deve...
For every dollar a white family owns, the median Latino family has six cents and the median black family has a nickel. That staggering gap didn't happen by chance.
No matter how the new Congress decides to proceed towards job creation, there is low-hanging fruit that can be exploited at no cost to the taxpayer -- namely the Community Reinvestment Act.
North Chicago Auto Service is a solid small business with deep ties to its community. Which is why its owner, Richard Otero-Cintrón, was so surprised to learn that his long-time bank had rejected his loan application.
In the first three quarters of 2010, more than 25,000 homes in the Chicago region completed the foreclosure process and were repossessed by the lender.
If the Dodd-Frank was designed to prevent future disasters from occurring, it should have taken a look at income inequality as one of the causes of the crisis.
CRA has a 30-year track record of success and, thanks to these proposed provisions, it will evolve with the needs of the new economy. CRA will extend its influence and continue to direct mainstream banks to underserved communities to ensure that families are not excluded from a fair lending market.
What if there was a law that told big corporations that they have responsibilities to the communities they serve? There is. It's called the Community Reinvestment Act and a fight over it's future is brewing in Congress.
One of the most striking--and perhaps most underreported--aspects of the financial crisis is reflected in one economic indicator. The chart below tra...
As bank regulators take a close look at modernizing the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), we're walking you through some key reasons why CRA must be updated.
These hearings that could improve the Community Reinvestment Act, the 1977 law designed to ensure banks remain connected to communities. Regulators decided it may be time to update how this law is enforced.
If the Obama Administration is serious about protecting the average American, then Fannie and Freddie must have a public role in the financial markets. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water.
Recent legislation passed by both houses of the state legislature directs that all state funds be deposited in financial institutions that meet the credit needs of low- and moderate-income communities.
To ensure that all types of financial institutions are meeting the credit needs of their entire market area, including low-wealth communities and communities of color, the CRA assessment must be changed.
Moving forward we need more lending activities to be covered by our community reinvestment laws. Here are three ways our community reinvestment regulations need to be modernized.
Bad economic news has dominated the headlines continuously since at least the spring of 2007: rising foreclosures, growing job loss, dwindling college...
As foreclosures rise, Black and Latino households find themselves struggling to climb out of a hole that is widening under systemic poverty, joblessness and state and local budget crises.
Until the government does a better job of encouraging sustainable and appropriate banking services and credit options to neighborhoods of color, this crisis is not anywhere near over.
It is time to end the anticompetitive restrictions limiting local governments from depositing their funds in institutions that provide the greatest benefits to their residents.