Our 'Intelligent Design' Could Use A Rewrite
Yup, Darwin was right and Bachmann (who is 55) is wrong. We are nothing more than products of random evolutionary mutation.
Yup, Darwin was right and Bachmann (who is 55) is wrong. We are nothing more than products of random evolutionary mutation.
Mark Morford | Posted 11.21.2011
Do you want to know the real reason Barack Obama is going to win the 2012 election? The big, grinning hunk of overwhelming evidence that has little to...
Rev. Jonathan Weyer | Posted 05.25.2011
In going to the Creation Museum, I would be visiting a place where I not only disagree theologically with people but also with their entire culture war mentality.
John Farrell | Posted 05.25.2011
The Discovery Institute has claimed it would get actual scientists to consider intelligent design as a viable scientific theory, by publishing peer-reviewed articles in the leading science journals. But they've failed. And now, they're losing the Catholics.
David Horton | Posted 05.25.2011
It is as if we still had, living among us, people who believed in phlogiston, or humors, or the heart as the seat of emotions.
Jeff Schweitzer | Posted 05.25.2011
Just as the majority of people no longer accept the idea of a flat earth, the time has come to credit Darwin's discovery by finally rejecting the notion that faith is equivalent to data.
Washington Post | Posted 05.25.2011
Every winter, David DeWitt takes his biology class to the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, but for a purpose far different from that ...
John Blumenthal | Posted 12.27.2011