Democrats Need to Get Off Capitol Hill to Win the Gas Price War
While I admire Reid for what he's done I think he is incorrect in the assumption he made that the Democrats are winning on the energy and gas price issue.
While I admire Reid for what he's done I think he is incorrect in the assumption he made that the Democrats are winning on the energy and gas price issue.
Something sinister is afoot in the steep decline of oil prices: Our sense of outrage at the oil industry risks being mollified; just when we become serious about alternative fuels, suddenly, magically, the price of oil retreats.
Fuel and fuel-cell costs -- and a lack of fueling infrastructure -- are still problematic but, with strong political will and close industry-government cooperation, are all solvable.
Tom Friedman distorted Al Gore's new energy challenge, which called for an energy policy based on 100 percent renewable sources, by including the role of coal. Isn't coal a nonrenewable fossil fuel?
Flying to visit his wind operations in Sweetwater, Texas, T. Boone Pickens makes it clear that his next wind project is big, Texas-style -- 4,000 megawatts up in the Panhandle north of here.
John McCain foolishly credited the recent $10-a-barrel drop in the price of oil to President Bush's lifting of the offshore drill ban. What's he going to do when prices nudge or jump upwards again?
Big Oil makes more money when prices go up and that money is nicely spread among its allies in Congress. Trusting these guys is like trusting your neighborhood pusher.
Lost amongst all the "solutions" to the energy crisis lies the fact that the energy crisis is simply one component of a much broader ecological crisis.
This year, they are rewarding John McCain more heavily than any other politician in America. So far they've given him more than any two senators combined, a whopping $1,010,868.
Dealing with one sector without thinking about the other is one-hand clapping. That's why we have popular alternative fuels like ethanol that don't factor in the drain on water resources.
The real challenge isn't that we can't afford a carbon-free economy -- because it's not that big a bill. The awesomely difficult -- perhaps impossible -- challenge will be getting it done in a decade.
I am told that Gore opposes atomic energy. But if so, his public silence -- and lack of action -- is deafening. If he really wants to have a lasting impact, he must join us in publicly opposing nuclear power.
We're so screwed that there's no way we can drill ourselves out of this mess. What will it take for people to accept the fact that the era of livin' large is over?
I have long believed that a project like Apollo/Manhattan for alternative energy simply wouldn't work.
According to their results, a stunning 6 out of 10 voters now favor McCain's drilling proposal. More worrying, they note, is that voters are rejecting Obama's message of renewable fuel investment.
Jim Slattery, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Kansas, dropped by Netroots Nation this morning to talk about how progressives can make inroads in the heartland.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
This has the promise of providing the minute amount of fuel needed for generating heat for the Air Car operated at higher speeds.
http://zeropollutionmotors.us/?page_id=38
......roads, where we're going we don't need roads.......
What? This isn't a Mr Fusion power source?
Peak Oil is solved!
yahoo!
what...?, you want govt. money to subsidize it?
ok...,
what are the numbers?
how much garbage do we generate in a year?
how many cars are on the road?
and how much fuel can that garbage make?
high gas prices lead to charlatans selling elixers to make money off of fools
Given that the major consumers of fossil fuels tend to also be the major producers of garbage (e.g. the U.S., China, India, etc.) this is a technology that makes sense on so many levels.
This is the kind of "alternative" energy production that the Government should (and should have been for the last 30 years) be putting its full support behind. Tax credits, or straight out funding, should be provided immediately in order to "jump start" this industry and get it up and running as quickly as possible.
Instead of having our nation loading our garbage on boats that travel around the world looking for a country willing to allow us to dump in their backyard, we could be reducing the total tonnage of our waste and using a significant amount of it to reduce our dependence on M.E. Oil.
Guess that all makes too much sense for our politicians.
unfortunately until recently it was not economically feasable. The cost to produce the fuel would have been so much greater than the cost to buy it plus the cost to dispose of the waste. Unfortunately this technology is dependant on a steady stream of organic waste so it like most alternative energy sources has limited applications. It's a great boon for animal farning though. All the waste can be quickly processed rather than get into ground soil etc.
I've loved these plants for years. They run off of natural gass which is an offshoot of the conversion process and can put excess electricity produced back into the grid. byproducts of the process can be refined into industrial resources and you can through parameters of the production process get out driveable fuels on tap, no further refinement necessary. They will work on any biological refuse from manure to yard clippings. All at the price of about 40$ per barrel. They totally rock.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in