Lieberman Kyl

The White House needs to shut up with its threats and start talking with Iran. Threats empower the hawks in Tehran with Bush's favorite weapon: fear.

Recent history has caused me to be more suspicious of the informality of resolutions that carry a potential war component as mere window dressing.

Professor Stephen Zunes' idea of establishing a nuclear free zone struck me as an urgent and actionable way to intercept the national dialog.

Clinton's failure to utter the slightest protest in the face of a real threat of war must be taken as prima facie evidence that Clinton has no fundamental disagreement with war against Iran.

I truly do want Obama to challenge Clinton and take it to her. I want to see him fight. But it seems a bit spineless to attack someone for a vote he skipped out on.

In March, Webb introduced legislation demanding that the president seek congressional approval before striking Iran. Senator Clinton will co-sponsor legislation with Webb and re-introduce it into the Senate.

The politicians and media in the United States are creating the conditions that will inevitably lead to a major new war in the Middle East.

She's confident that progressives are too impotent, divided, and disorganized to deny her the nomination. How else to explain her vote for the Lieberman-Kyl Amendment?

Yesterday she voted to bring the country a serious step closer to war against Iran. And she did so for the same reason that she voted to authorize the war on Iraq.

've never expected much from Lieberman, but this latest display of missing-backbone on behalf of the Democrats lowers my expectations of his former party.

The Lieberman-Kyle amendment just passed the Senate after two sections were removed to satisfy Dems that it will not serve as a backdoor authorization for war against Iran.