US Seeks Up To 7,000 More NATO Troops For Afghan War
U.S. and European estimates of the new troops they may get from NATO allies vary from 3,000 to 7,000. Those would complement the additional U.S. force...
U.S. and European estimates of the new troops they may get from NATO allies vary from 3,000 to 7,000. Those would complement the additional U.S. force...
AP | KATHY GANNON and ELENA BECATOROS | Posted 11.20.2009 | World
KABUL — For his critics, President Hamid Karzai's inaugural speech Thursday struck all the right notes – sober pledges to get tough on cor...
New York Times | SABRINA TAVERNISE and ERIC SCHMITT | Posted 11.18.2009 | World
Success in this region, in the remote mountains near the Afghan border, could have a direct bearing on how many more American troops are ultimately se...
Miles Mogulescu | Posted 11.16.2009 | Politics
If Congress is going to be called upon to finance this war with billions more in taxpayer dollars, this debate should be taking place in the halls of Congress in front of the American people.
washingtonindependent.com | Spencer Ackerman | Posted 11.13.2009 | World
Update, 8:50 a.m.: I am retracting this post, published yesterday, titled "Inside This Morning's White House Afghanistan Meeting: Anger With Eikenberr...
ABC News | Jake Tapper | Posted 11.12.2009 | Politics
In an interview with Roland Martin on the Tom Joyner Morning Show this morning, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Colin Powell reveale...
AP | BEN FELLER and ANNE GEARAN | Posted 11.12.2009 | World
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama does not plan to accept any of the Afghanistan war options presented by his national security team, pushing ...
CBS News | Font Size Print E | Posted 11.09.2009 | World
President Obama has settled on a new strategy for Afghanistan. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that the president will send a lot more tro...
McClatchy | Jonathan S. Landay | Posted 11.07.2009 | World
President Barack Obama is nearing a decision to send more than 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan next year, but he may not announce it unti...
Michael Brenner | Posted 11.06.2009 | World
Obama will do the predictable next week and sign on to plans for an expanded American commitment in Afghanistan. In truth, he could not do otherwise -- for three reasons.
AP | ELENA BECATOROS and DEB RIECHMANN | Posted 11.04.2009 | World
KABUL — The killing of five British troops by a rogue Afghan policeman underlines concerns about training and discipline within the ranks and po...
Wall Street Journal | By YOCHI J. DREAZEN | Posted 11.03.2009 | World
The Army's top generals worry that surging tens of thousands more troops into Afghanistan could increase the strain felt by many military personnel af...
AP | HEIDI VOGT and ROBERT H. REID | Posted 11.02.2009 | World
KABUL — President Hamid Karzai effectively secured a second term Sunday when his only challenger dropped out of the race, and the Obama administ...
Derrick Crowe | Posted 10.28.2009 | World
If you're looking for the man who once asked, "how do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?" you better keep looking. The senator seems to have left him behind.
Robert Naiman | Posted 10.27.2009 | World
You don't have to be a dove to understand what President Kennedy understood: putting U.S. troops on the ground somewhere doesn't automatically make you more powerful.
Posted 10.28.2009 | Politics
WASHINGTON — A former Marine who fought in Iraq, joined the State Department after leaving the military and was a diplomat in a Taliban strongho...
ABC News | Posted 10.26.2009 | Politics
Sources tell ABC News that as of now President Obama will likely announce his decision about a new strategy in Afghanistan at some point between the A...
Washington Post | Greg Jaffe and Karen DeYoung | Posted 10.26.2009 | World
The Pentagon's top military officer oversaw a secret war game this month to evaluate the two primary military options that have been put forward by th...
Derrick Crowe | Posted 10.21.2009 | World
We can now stand back in awe as the unpunished perpetrators of massive election fraud vie for control of the criminal enterprise called the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
New York Times | ELISABETH BUMILLER | Posted 10.19.2009 | World
After nearly a month of deliberations by Mr. Obama over whether to send more American troops to Afghanistan, frustrations and anxiety are on the rise ...
The Hill | Roxana Tiron | Posted 10.14.2009 | Politics
The United States spends about $3.6 billion a month in Afghanistan, according to data provided by the Congressional Research Service. ...
Percy Blakeney | Posted 10.16.2009 | World
If Obama permits McChrystal to implement his strategy, the US will lose the war in Afghanistan, the Taliban will return to power, and the nation will once again become a safe haven for al-Qaeda and Islamic extremism.
Washington Post | Ann Scott Tyson | Posted 10.13.2009 | Politics
President Obama announced in March that he would be sending 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. But in an unannounced move, the White House has a...
Los Angeles Times | Laura King | Posted 10.12.2009 | World
Days before the outcome of Afghanistan's contentious presidential vote was expected to be announced, the head of the United Nations mission in the cou...
Wall Street Journal | By NAFTALI BENDAVID | Posted 10.11.2009 | Politics
WASHINGTON -- Republicans are stepping up attacks on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, deciding that a major part of their 2010 electoral strategy will be l...
Wall Street Journal | PETER SPIEGEL and STEPHEN FIDLER | Posted 11.21.2009 | World