Will Putin Influence the 2008 Election?
The timing of Russia's Georgia incursion gave urgency to Senator Obama's choice of Senate Foreign Policy Committee Chairman Joe Biden.
The timing of Russia's Georgia incursion gave urgency to Senator Obama's choice of Senate Foreign Policy Committee Chairman Joe Biden.
With reckless abandon Tuesday night, both Thompson and Lieberman made every rhetorical effort to shake down the audience -- tossing reality and facts to the four winds.
Russia's establishment of a strategic presence to the South gives it tremendous indirect leverage over the Middle East, and the missile deal announcement suggests that they want to continue in that direction.
Many women do like Palin -- there will be a lot who will be drawn to her gutsy, take on Washington's vested interests style as well as to her womanhood.
While many people were going ga-ga over Sarah Palin being able to read, with feeling, the Bush team's talking points off the teleprompter on Wednesd...
Of all the great resistance fighters I have met in my life, of all the Massouds and Izetbegovics I have had occasion to defend, Georgia's Saakashvili is the one who is the most unfamiliar with war, its rites, its emblems, its culture - but he is dealing with it.
Outside of the U.S., the utterances of Bush and McCain on Georgia are greeted with laughter, for they betoken a hypocrisy so ingrained it suggests insanity. The U.S. looks in the mirror and what do we see? Russia.
I hate to disagree with my good friends, the Republicans, especially in the midst of their badly mangled convention. But they've got their ticket al...
The Bush administration now pretends it can bully the Russians by threatening to kick them out of the G-8 and deny them membership in the WTO. This not only won't work, it is a dangerous delusion.
Wherever there's a hot war, there's an information war and the Georgia-Ossetia-Russia conflict is certainly no different. How do Georgians, South Ossetians, U.S. citizens get their information?
Moscow mainly relies on Russia's own energy resources for financial wealth and political advantage, but it also seeks to dominate the delivery of oil and gas from the Caspian states to the West.
The contrast between McCain's bellicosity and Obama's more measured tones is more significant than their view of the Russia-Georgia war itself.
Who benefits most from painting this a revival of Soviet-era aggression? John McCain. The Georgian crisis has created a campaign issue he can run on.
President Bush is right to demand an immediate end to the looting and shooting in Georgia by Russia, but he should also turn his attention to recent aggressive Russian activity in the opening Arctic.
Worth reading, Maureen Dowd's op-ed in today's Times. Summary -- the McC choice of Palin is the plot of a low budget chick flick. Now, picking up the...
The conflict between Russia and Georgia did not begin on August 8th, and it won't end anytime soon. Bluster will not push the Russians back, nor will (nearly empty) threats of retaliation.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Now its Americas fault Frank that the rest of the world runs into the arms America.Oh how we Americans forget our short history and when trying to create one we are knocked.But I do remember a little history of russian,along with the chinese jets, bombing Americans in Vetnam, as the French retreated again. So now we try to build a history or remember what they did to our troops there we are to forget .Not quite yet. Our history goes back further than most Americans remember Frank.How about most presidents are trying there best and it always dosent appeal to some people.
So now Kosovo was all about Israel. It had nothing to do with Europe, I suppose. The mere fact that this continent has been the center of US security concerns for a century. Of course, we didn't intervene in Rwanda but we did in former Yugoslavia. Why the difference? It must be about Israel It has nothing to do with the casual racism of valuing European lives more than African ones. No, it all comes back to Israel, the familiar bogey man.
As much as I admire the scholasticism of this piece, it ignores an essential question, which seems to have been ignored by a lot of people: Specifically, What Happened? Who attacked who? Did Georgia raze the cit of Tskhinvali, as claimed by Gorbechev and Larzov (sp?)? Or did Russia attack the Georgia troops without provocation, and if so, how did Tskhinvali get destroyed.
So far, only the Russian side has stated, unequivically, that they moved against the Georgia forces after Georgia attacked a city in South Ossetia, where Georgia has no territorial claims and certainly no right to attack innocent civilians.
Any speculation about the motives of world leaders has to be preceeded by simply answering; What Happened? What comes before why.
"what comes before why".... No, I disagree. The media will telll you what happened but not why.
The USA was established by religious refugees dedicated to the proposition that the republic could only survive by staying out of European religious wars.
Over time, those zealous for war took over the reins of government for that purpose.
At the moment they are able to call their political opponents "isolationists" although most non militarists in foreign policy today tend to be very commercially active internationally and are not isolationist at all. Indeed, the religious warriors are the ones who have most isolated America with their bad decisions.
Here is a little story for Frank (and Arianna if she is interested). I was born lutheran but grew up in a small south american town where there was no protestant church, only catholic so I enrolled in catholic cathechism. I learned prayers and of course the catholics cross themselves all the time. My first time I crossed myself first on the right shoulder then the left. My cathechism teacher immediately corrected me and I asked her what the difference was since it was a cross either way. She explained that there was a sect of Christians who were in league with the devil and crossed themselves on the right shoulder first. She said if I crossed myself first on the right shoulder, the devil would take my soul.
No, "what happened" in Georgia doesn't matter. International relations are not Tortes 101 at Harvard Law.
"What Happened" begins with Condi Rice publically stating a couple of weeks ago "We'll fight for our friends" with Saakashvili at her side. The comment was in reference to Georgia's desire to join NATO, something opposed by most NATO members. She meant the the US would fight against it's NATO partners in the politicing over Georgia's application. Saakashvili took it to mean something else.
The history books will probably call this Rice's biggest blunder as Sec of State (there are so many others to chose from....)
Go to the New Yorker site
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2008/08/25/080825taco_talk_remnick
The essay is a good background article. It describes the matter succinctly. Sequence - 1) Georgia rockets Tskhinvali 2) Georgian troops cross border and reek more havoc in and around Tskhinvali 3) Russian forces move into Ossetia 4) After occupying Ossetia, Russians continue into Georgia.
As an Orthodox Christian, I must protest this mischaracterization of the Russia-Georgia conflict as Orthodox Christian self-defense against an encroaching heterodox West.
Both Russia and Georgia are Orthodox Christian cultures, so this war is not about faith, but about politics, self-determination, geopolitical ambition and international alignment.
Russia cannot pose as a "defender of faith." Atheistic Marxism has fallen and the Church is freer there now, but the wounds of eight decades of religious persecution and forced secularization will not heal overnight. Spiritual and moral recovery after brutal erosion takes time, like the Hebrews wandering the desert for forty years between slavery in Egypt and freedom in the Promised Land.
And as in America nowadays, religious talk in Russia isn"t always religious. Both are misusing religion as cover for political agendas. When pagan persecution ceased and Christianity became respectable in the Roman Empire, many converted merely for social acceptance and advancement. The Church in Russia now faces the same "nominal Christian" dilemma, but Orthodox Christianity is about following Jesus Christ -- not a "replacement ideology" for social cohesion, ethnic identity or political statehood in the vacuum left by communism"s demise there.
An old Russian saying, attributed to Saint Alexander Nevsky, comes to mind in this conflict: "God is not in might, but in right." Would to God that all involved in this conflict took those words to heart!
But please, don't misuse Orthodox Christianity as a pretext for this latest bout of human sinfulness.
I still think there is a point to this article. It may be subtle, but it's there. The countries that, egged on by the meddling of the US, have antagonized Russia are: The Czech Republic, Poland, the Ukraine, and to some degree Hungary with its adverse behavior toward Serbia. The first place the Serbs hit during the latest Balkan war was Vukovar in Slavonia, after Croatia declared itself independent from Yugoslavia. What do all of these countries have in common. They are all Serb, except Hungary. But they are also all Catholic. Having been raised a Catholic, I have been exposed to their animus toward the Eastern Church, especially during the period of the USSR.