Obama Administration: There Are No Current Plans To Ask Congress For Libya Funds
WASHINGTON -- Among the features of America’s military involvement in Libyan airspace that has given some lawmakers pause: the cost. At a time when ...
WASHINGTON -- Among the features of America’s military involvement in Libyan airspace that has given some lawmakers pause: the cost. At a time when ...
Tom Andrews | Posted 05.25.2011
The WikiLeaks documents demonstrate why those 162 Members of the House were so right in casting their vote against an open ended military commitment to the government of Afghanistan.
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
If the war supplemental is not approved this week, the troops will still be paid and the troops will still be fully supplied. There is no "emergency" requiring action this week.
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
The war supplemental for Afghanistan is expected to come back from the Senate to the House next week, without any kind of timetable for military withdrawal, and without money to save teachers' jobs.
AP | ANDREW TAYLOR | Posted 05.25.2011
WASHINGTON — Despite pessimism that the war in Afghanistan is turning out to be a quagmire, Democrats controlling the House muscled through a pl...
Rep. Dennis Kucinich | Posted 05.25.2011
While millions of Americans are out of work, losing their homes, losing their savings, their pensions, and their retirement security, we are literally sending pallets of cash overseas to benefit warlords and corrupt politicians.
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
The administration hopes to dodge questions about the war supplemental urgently being asked by Democratic leaders in the House by claiming that more funds are an exigent, "emergency" need. They're not.
Tom Andrews | Posted 05.25.2011
Unfortunately, President Obama missed an opportunity today to not only replace an out-of-control general but an out-of-control and failing strategy in...
Coleen Rowley | Posted 05.25.2011
On Tuesday April 13th, over 100 Minnesotans demonstrated outside Senator Amy Klobuchar's office with half of our group eventually going inside to see...
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
The coming fight over the war supplemental is an opportunity for Members of Congress to use the megaphone provided by the debate to attack specific egregious aspects of U.S. foreign policy.
HuffingtonPost.com | Arthur Delaney | Posted 05.25.2011
On one side: teachers, doctors and their patients, the jobless, disaster victims, the troops. On the other: private equity firms, hedge funds, ventu...
HuffingtonPost.com | Dan Froomkin | Posted 05.25.2011
Members of Congress with any inclination to balk at President Obama's massive emergency war-funding request have found their case strengthened by two ...
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
In the next few days the House of Representatives is expected to debate and vote on a "privileged resolution" that would establish a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
Scott Payne | Posted 05.25.2011
No one ever went broke betting on the hypocrisy of congressional Republicans.
Tom Andrews | Posted 05.25.2011
After years of working and voting to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Congressional progressives have a chance to do just that.
Jane Hamsher | Posted 05.25.2011
In 2007, 82 Democratic members of Congress signed a pledge to not fund the war in Iraq without plans for troop withdrawal. Tuesday, they must vote against the Supplemental Appropriations Act.
HuffingtonPost.com | Jeff Muskus | Posted 05.25.2011
In anticipation of Tuesday's House vote on the war supplemental spending bill, which still includes money for the International Monetary Fund but not ...
Robert Naiman | Posted 05.25.2011
The White House and the House leadership want progressive Democrats in the House to abandon their constituents, their commitments, and their principles and vote for the War/IMF supplemental. But when progressive Democrats tried to have input into the process earlier, they were locked out by the leadership, on orders from the White House and Treasury.
Mark Weisbrot | Posted 05.25.2011
Obama and the House Democrats can't seem to muscle the votes they need to pass a $108 billion appropriation for the IMF. The stakes are high for both the administration, and the world.
Nathan Havey | Posted 05.25.2011
We need to stay engaged in Afghanistan, but we need a radically different strategy that emphasizes quality of life for the Afghan people, regional diplomacy, and for God's sake, a reduction of boots on the ground.
Politico | Posted 05.25.2011
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just made two seemingly contradictory assertions: First, that so-called "torture" photos of interrogations won't ev...
Jodie Evans | Posted 05.25.2011
Money spent on military would be much better spent on infrastructure, jobs, and international partnerships. People don't have the tools the need to move toward a peaceful reality.
Mark Weisbrot | Posted 05.25.2011
The Obama administration wants $108 billion for the IMF. Why? Most of the Central and Eastern European economies are in free fall right now, and they're counting on the IMF to save their banks.
HuffingtonPost.com | Jeff Muskus | Posted 05.25.2011
With the war supplemental under fire from some unlikely allies in the House, Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) threatened Mond...
HuffingtonPost.com | Thomas B. Edsall | Posted 05.25.2011
President Obama, who has suffered relatively few setbacks in the Democratic-controlled Congress, has allowed one key administration bill -- the $96.7 ...
HuffingtonPost.com | Sam Stein | Posted 05.25.2011