More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tanya Greene

Tanya Greene

GET UPDATES FROM Tanya Greene
 

Bradley Manning's Treatment Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Posted: 03/30/11 07:16 PM ET

Recent news reports suggest that Pfc. Bradley Manning, accused of leaking government files to WikiLeaks, is being held by our government, alone, often naked, in a small isolation cell for months at a time as he awaits legal proceedings to commence against him. Many Americans are appalled by the thought of this kind of treatment. While it appears these confinement conditions serve no purpose other than to degrade Pfc. Manning and break his spirit, they provide an important opportunity for the nation to reflect on the deeply damaging impact of solitary confinement.

Sen. John McCain, who was held in solitary confinement as a prisoner during the Vietnam War, once asserted: "it's an awful thing, solitary... it crushes your spirit and weakens your resistance more effectively than any other form of mistreatment." It's hard to believe that such things could happen in America.

But the truth is that such things happen in America every day. Tens of thousands of prisoners in the U.S. are treated similarly, and sometimes worse. For these individuals, solitary confinement means being locked alone in a solid-walled cell for 23-24 hours a day with little human contact or interaction, reduced or no natural light (or sometimes cells are illuminated for 24 hours a day), strict regulation of access to amenities (often meaning very little reading material, no TV, and no radio), greater constraints on visitation (no physical contact with friends or family, including sons and daughters), and the inability to participate in group activities, including eating with others. Often, prisoners are kept in solitary confinement for months and even years, and sometimes decades. One Virginia man has been locked in solitary for 10 years for his religiously based refusal to cut his hair.

The devastating effects of solitary confinement have long been well known. Dr. Sandra Schank, California prison psychiatrist admitted: "It's a standard psychiatric concept, if you put people in isolation, they will go insane. Most people in isolation will fall apart." In a 2005 submission to the U.S. Supreme Court, a group of psychologists and psychiatrists concluded that "no study of the effects of solitary or Supermax-like confinement that lasted longer than 60 days failed to find evidence of negative psychological effects." Solitary confinement can also violate the international law the United States is so quick to cite in reference to other countries.

Prison officials claim this punishment of last resort is reserved for the "worst of the worst." However, more and more prisoners are put into "the hole" for minor infractions, often because of mental illness or cognitive disorders left untreated, resulting in prison rule violations.

And the boom in the building of prisons devoted to solitary confinement (also known as "Supermax" prisons) in the 1990s means more space despite limited need. As a result, the U.S. locks more than 20,000 people in solitary confinement each day in Supermax prisons in more than 30 states, and thousands more in other prisons and jails across the country.

Further, at least 10 to 20 percent of prisoners in solitary confinement suffer from mental illness -- either preexisting or induced through solitary confinement. Some states admit to many more. Even children housed in adult prisons -- a terrifying proposition anyway -- are often kept in maddening isolation "for their own safety."

The Colorado legislature is currently considering restricting the overuse of solitary confinement and, in particular, making sure the mentally ill are not further harmed by these conditions. Legislators got emotional at the horrors related during the hearing this month on the issue. Unfortunately the Colorado Department of Corrections has claimed making these changes is too expensive for the state and may succeed in killing the bill. To aid the ACLU of Colorado in this effort, click here. The ACLU affiliates in New Mexico and Texas are also engaged in legislative battles to reduce the use of solitary confinement in their states.

Critics have rightly pointed out that the our government should not violate the fundamental human rights of Pfc. Manning, regardless of any crimes he may have committed. The same is true for every other prisoner in solitary confinement in this great country.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:34 PM on 04/02/2011
Assange is a hero. WikiLeaks is heroic. Manning is a hero. Our government is continuing war crimes, violating human rights, violating international law. Obama needs to be held accountable, and subjected to the same treatment as Manning. First, though, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Yoo, Rove, and the rest need to be prosecuted for the same crimes.
08:02 AM on 03/31/2011
Well said, Ms. Greene. Our country's willingness to abuse prisoners is a human rights embarrassment. How can our leaders possibly believe this is acceptable?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neighborhoodmole
no one really knows who anyone is here
01:28 PM on 03/31/2011
Most prisoners are viewed as bad guys by almost everyone who investigates the details of their incarceration, so there is little sympathy. A politician will not gain popularity by pushing for more humane treatment of convicts, or even those merely accused, especially when it may cost more money. The reason so many of us are upset by Bradley Manning's treatment is that what he did was not wrong if you believe that his primary motive was to exposes lies, coverups and war crimes. While what Manning did was illegal, it may not have been wrong. I think he would not be convicted in a civilian court, but military courts are run differently and I suspect he will be found guilty on most if not all accounts and sentenced to life at Leavenworth military prison, where his current treatment will continue indefinitely. Perhaps political pressure for a pardon will be his only hope then.
12:16 AM on 04/01/2011
Your willingness to condone the torture and abuse of prisoners -- even if guilty -- is disturbing and should be a source of shame not a source of pride suggested by your cavalier attitude towards it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGuy
Swiis Canton, Dutch Republic, advocate
10:44 PM on 03/30/2011
Although I consider Julian Asange and Wikileals as those who aid and abbet enemies of our republic, for jeopardizing American soldoers and American allies throughout the world, and even being responsible for the murder of those who cooperate with America. Wikileaks is as much an adversary as the Taliban and Al Aueda, acting as the intellgence source for an enemy. Wikileaks certainly is more dangerous to the lives of American soldiers and those that iad our efforts tham the Libyan government.
However, it is a tenet of our Constitution, that a man is innocent until proven guilty. And I fear that mr. Manning may be used as a fall guy,
perhaps like the Rosenbergs or Professor Lee of Los Alamos as the pariah scape goat to cover other higher ups, say with White House , State Dept or Congressional collusion and cooperation ,
07:47 AM on 03/31/2011
More civilians have been intentionally and knowingly murdered by U.S. soldiers than have been murdered as a result of wikileaks. When the U.S. Military uses the classification system to hide criminal activities, abuse, and even murder -- there is moral responsibility to expose it. Private Manning was the only person courageous enough to do so. The sad reality is that while courage is "claimed" as a value of our military -- cowardice is what is rewarded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGuy
Swiis Canton, Dutch Republic, advocate
09:18 AM on 03/31/2011
This is why the eventual outcome of any guerrilla war is either the near extermination of the invaded country, such as the Legions of Titus did in Masada or America did with the Indian tribes or the wearing out by attrition of the occupying force, such as the Spanish guerrilas against Napoleon;s troops, The Sicilian Vespers the Irish rebellion of Michael Collins, Gandhi and Nehru, the eventual victory of General Giap and Ho Chi Minh or David Ben Gurion's successful terrorist campaign against the British in the 1940's,
Goya shows the terror impposed upon a civilian population by a foreign army contending against a guerrilla force. This is why the Geneva convention requires all combatants to constantly wear distinguishing uniforms. The Geneva signatories recognize a historical and psychological inevitability. When a foreign embedded army is beset by part-time adversaries who blend in among the civilians, the uniformed soldiers will soon assume all civilians are potential terrorist and enemies, or else why would they tolerate the guerrilas among them? Self preservation and self protection mixed with frustration will inevitably cause the soldiers to consider genocide"Kill them all and let God decide" The Germans did that when confronted with the French resistance, The use of Partisans either results in wholesale slaughter and enslavement or the rate of attrition forcing the occupier to leave. Terrorism causes repression and murder.repression and assassination causes the public to side with the guerrillas. Eventual population sympathy causes the evacuation of occupier, Geneva- Chivalry won't work
09:10 PM on 03/30/2011
What I don't understand is how a 1st class Pvt has access to so many top secret docs. It seems our intelligence agencies with access to 10's of billions of our tax $$$ would be able to provide proper security firewalls & encryption codes to keep this info secret. Instead I think they are trying to place blame on a kid, who only exposed the true actual horrors of these occupations that we don't see on mainstream media. I think the real threat is the big money backing the politicians. However when this is exposed, like on wiki-leaks, again we want blood. If these types of documents keep making it out in public, and those that don't want these thing exposed go after the perpetrators with such bloodlust, won;t people start thinking " What's the Gvnmt Got to hide?"
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
09:38 PM on 03/30/2011
The reports that Manning had access too are just run of the mill documents, nothing covert. But now, all government documents are marked as classified. This was done under the Bush/Chenney Administration, so no government official could turn over any report to the press at any time; unless, it was cleared by Chenney/Bush. The program was called something like "united voice" and it covered all government agencies, including Centers for Disease Control, USAID, FEMA, etc, not only the military. This way no one could talk to the press, civil society groups or universities if they disagreed with the Chenney/Bush agenda. IF you did not get clearance to release the report and you did, you could get terminated or worse face jail time. IT's extremely important to point out that President Obama has not change this policy. In fact, they are strictly enforcing it.
07:49 AM on 03/31/2011
Not only is Obama strictly enforcing this policy -- he has prosecuted more people who have violated than even Bush had.
09:45 PM on 03/30/2011
Your point is also the one I have never understood. If these "secrets" were so easy to access and circulate, how could they really be secrets? Of the information disclosed to date, I have seen little that was not known, or at least widely discussed, well before the Wikileaks disclosures. When I have written on this topic on the HuffPost, I have received replies indicating that Mr. Manning's alleged disclosures constituted one of the biggest compromises of secret information in our country's history, but I still have not seen anything released that was particularly secret or, for that matter important. In addition, if it was accessible to a PFC, someone in charge of our secrets was asleep at the wheel and not doing his or her job very well. But, of course, that person, or those persons, are not being held without bail, stripped at night to humiliate them, and pilloried in the press as a traitors. Then again, they are also undoubtedly not PFCs, without the resources to defend themselves. There is just something oddly inconsistent and unexplained about this case, and I think that is why the defendant is being held in such tight security and without the rights of other prisoners.
07:53 AM on 03/31/2011
It is only "one of the biggest" in terms of "volume" -- not in strategic secrets. That said -- it has provided documentation to criminal behavior being illegally obfuscated via the classification system. And it has revealed that cowardice is widely rewarded and even expected within the military.
08:46 PM on 03/30/2011
It's not a great country any more. It's abyssmal.
08:00 PM on 03/30/2011
Kept naked in a cell, unable to share in group activities. Reaction is funny. What such activities? One similar to the activities in the all male conga line of a certain newspaper of record?
Had 'bradass87' pulled a stunt like this between 66 and 70 years ago he would have been, after a hasty courtmartial, marched forthwith to a sturdy stone wall and summarily dismissed from the US Army.
But that was a time when this nation seriously considered winnng the wars it was engaged in.
Todays goal is national suicide by political correctness.
We need more quality stone masons
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neighborhoodmole
no one really knows who anyone is here
08:43 PM on 03/30/2011
It would be more humane to just shoot Manning like you suggest than to subject him to this severe isolation for the rest of his life, which is what I suspect the government is planning to do. I was reading about the conditions of the military prison at Leavenworth where he will go if convicted. Those deemed to be national security risks, which is what he is labeled, are kept in solitary indefinitely. I agree with the author, there is something wrong with that. Don't we have the technology to keep society safe from some people without torturing the people? As long as Manning doesn't have access to a computer, I can't see what harm he can do at this point, the kid is only 5'3" tall and very weak now from almost a year of forced idleness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Moore
Afraid of clowns
09:34 PM on 03/30/2011
Thankfully we've evolved from the firing squad. But holding a soldier indefinitely in solitary is still wrong. PC my butt.