Huffpost Religion
The Blog

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Taufiq Rahim Headshot

A Tale of Two Islams

Posted: Updated:

Taufiq Rahim is a Dubai-based political analyst who blogs regularly on TheGeopolitico.com.

“I will pay whoever kills the makers of this video $100,000. If someone else makes other blasphemous material in the future, I will also pay his killers $100,000.”

These words were uttered not by a firebrand cleric but by a cabinet minister in Pakistan, Ghulam Ahmad Bilour, pushing the reaction to a provocative film (vacuously) satirical of the Prophet Muhammad to even more
absurd levels.

We witnessed something different altogether in Libya, after the initial violence. On September 11 of this year, anti-film protests in Benghazi, combined with what is now regarded as a coordinated terrorist attack, led to the death of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, other State Department personnel and Libyan security forces. Within two weeks, however, tens of thousands of ordinary Libyans had marched to the central al-Kish square in the same city, chanting, “No to terror, no to Al Qaeda,” eventually overrunning the bases of groups suspected of being complicit in the earlier attack.

Following the Arab revolutions of 2011, Islam has forcefully entered the public square, and as political forces jockey for power, we are witnessing a growing duel between radical rejectionists and groups favoring more inclusive engagement. If the former gain the upper hand in this battle, which differs country by country, it could plunge the wider Middle East into a decade of darkness.

With the revolutions in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen, we have seen secular autocrats swept from power and Islamist forces come to the forefront. The contestation by religious parties in the democratic arena has meant the mainstreaming of political parties in the Arab world. The rise of well-known groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Al Nahda party in Tunisia, however, has been accompanied by the emergence of a new political force, Salafists, who adhere
to a very puritanical interpretation of Islam.

The political Salafists have tried to brand themselves as true defenders of the faith in opposition to so-called “moderate” Islamists. In effect, they are trying to out-Islam their opponents. While prior, the Salafist movement had only a limited political role and the more extreme of their members were part of the wider jihadi movement that includes Al Qaeda, today they are using the new environment to assert themselves in the
mainstream. While just emerging in the Arab world, it is a trend that countries like Pakistan have been dealing with for the last
several years.

Despite their ability to mobilize in numbers and vitriol, the Salafists appear to be in the minority, as witnessed in recent election results across the Arab world. The majority, however, has not coalesced around a coherent ideology that can provide an alternative vision for progress and development. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, while trying to be pragmatic, have been muddled in their message following the initial anti-film protests, because even their own slogan in effect limits debate: Islam is the solution. Thus, the outpouring of demonstrations in Libya trying to reclaim the public space from more radical fringes could be the exception rather
than the trend.

We are therefore at a dangerous crossroads throughout the Middle East, North Africa and into South Asia, where given this political vacuum, radical Salafists are trying to overtake the public square, if not by numbers than by default. Moreover, certain interests within the Gulf are pushing these groups, which for them are preferable to more moderate Islamist forces that are seen as threatening to their regional legitimacy. This strength, combined with the growing neo-Islamic McCarthyism practiced by the Salafist political forces could mean that the silent majority is definitively silenced for the foreseeable future.

There is no easy way out, and the situation within each country is different. If the current crisis is viewed through the prism of a provocative film and an offended Muslim public, we are missing the broader political implications. In effect, we are seeing a shift from the post-9/11 decade fight of Al Qaeda versus autocratic regimes in the region, to the people versus the populists. The film has only served as the pretext for what is now termed the “outrage industry” that fuels radicals in so many Muslim countries.

If the current situation is to change, it will only happen if forces, within and outside the Muslim world, empower the marginalized majority that is seeking to define a more inclusive and
pluralistic future.

This story originally appeared in Huffington, in the iTunes App store.