As news was breaking today about the collapse of a proposed plan to
conduct a revote in the Democratic primary in Florida, I spoke to the
state's party chair, Karen Thurman.
Among the topics discussed was the role of Florida's Republican-controlled
legislature in this latest Sunshine State election controversy.
The following is reasonable way to resolve the seating of the Florida delegation that respects the State's voters, both Democratic candidates, and the fact that the Florida Legislature ignored the rules of both the Republican and Democratic Parties and moved the date of their primary, with full warning of resulting consequences:
1) The State of Florida's 210 Democratic delegates will be reduced by 50 percent, and 105 delegates will be seated at the Democratic Convention. (Similar to what the Republican Party has decided as a consequence of changing their primary date.)
2) The 105 delegates will be apportioned based on the Florida primary results, imperfect as it was, with Clinton receiving 50 percent or 52.5 delegates; Obama 33 percent or 34.5 delegates, and Edwards 14 percent or 14.5 delegates.
The above resolution will remove this topic as a continuing contentious issue, prevent a costly re-vote, however administered, yet seat the Florida delegation in a fair manner.
Now, let's move on to resolve Michigan.
Gregory Dunkling
Stowe, VT
Dunkling: RESOLVING the FLORIDA ELECTION The following is reasonable way to
''That is to say once and for all, to settle this, we will be voting on Jan. 29 with our candidates on the ballot,'' Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen Thurman said Sunday. ``At the end of the day, we came down on the side of having a fair and open election.''
Thurman said a majority of the more than 200 party leaders from across the state supported the decision, but a vocal minority of activists said it would handicap the party at a time when it should be capitalizing on the Republican administration's dwindling popularity.
''It's a Thelma and Louise strategy of backing up the car while we're driving over a cliff,'' said DNC member Allan Katz, a Tallahassee attorney involved in the negotiations., Another DNC member who lives in Tallahasssee, Jon Ausman, went so far to compare Thurman's negotiating tactics over the past month to ``George Bush in his handling of Iraq.''
"The Florida primary could not have been more fair. No democrat campaigned in Florida "
I hand it to you, it is rare for people to make an argument for their point of view that so explicitly points out the very absurdity of their own position.
lancesjogren: greejambri said: "The Florida primary could not have been more
Since the Florida rethuglicans moved the date over the objections of the democrats, the Florida delegation should be seated. While no one campaigned in the state (Obama ran TV ads), all the candidates were on the ballot. Their results should count.
CindyV: Since the Florida rethuglicans moved the date over the objections
It's great to see you, Tavis. Been a fan ever since BET (and my god is that network suffering without it's news hour, and your show). I'll watch tonight. I try to catch your PBS show as much as possible.
SNS: It's great to see you, Tavis. Been a fan ever
Was never much of a Tavis Smiley fan...would catch the show periodically...However his behavior toward Obama re: Tavis' Smiley's conference? totally turned me off on the man. Trying to get a piece of the Obama pie and sell books. I saw this interview...wonder if Tavis realizes when he talks about Obama and Clinton, he always mentions Clinton first and Obama last...while it hardly makes a real difference (although Hillary didn't like being asked all those questions FIRST) it does reflect Mr. Smiley's mindset. And that is what politics is all about. Nobody will ever make me believe that Mr. Smiley would not have accepted Bill Clinton in lieu of Hillary at Mr. Smiley's conference. Not given his patent bias in their favor. But if he wants to try to sell that pair of shoes then we will let him. He is one of a few black men who seem to have been having hissy fits at Obama's candidacy. I personally have no use for the man. A very smart poltical strategist told me, If I show up in your office unannounced and you are misbehaving...I suspect you are probably always misbehaving. Mr. Smiley genuflects when the Clinton name is mentioned, so I suspect that position is probably the usual for Mr. Smiley when it comes to the Clintons
anghiari: Was never much of a Tavis Smiley fan...would catch the
This sorry woman must be an Obama supporter.She is killing us that voted. in FLA>..that idiot on MSNBC said it was UNFAIR to count our votes here because NEITHER candidate got to campaign...oh my GOD...has he never heard of TV, newspapers and magazines..all we see here are speeches and articles in the media...we know PLENTY, and we have already voted...if that dumba_ _ Howard Dean had any B___, he would step in and seat these delegates...sounds like the rules should have been changed for Fla as soon as ALL the candidates names appeared on the ballot...what an idiot he is..if HILLARY gets cheated in FLA..as it looks like that is what the DNC wants to DO..they can STIICK their candidate and I , a lifelong DEMOCRAT will vote for McCAIN..at least then, Hillary might have a chance in 2012/ It is clear he wants to disenfranchise the Florida Democrats BECAUSE HILLARY won BIG here...what a travesty..the MAN who wants so badly to be
president that he would do that to the Fla. voters....work behind the scenes to NOT get a fair vote...hey, wait a minute, hasn't it happened BEFORE?????Gee, he must be following the "footsteps" of our wonderful "COOMANDER IN CHIEF, the Cheater himself, George BUSH...now, if Obama just has a brother he could name as governor of Fla.,.....
golferling: This sorry woman must be an Obama supporter.She is killing
You don't understand. Only people who have attended Obama rallies in person are qualified to vote in the primaries and caucuses because they have been inspired and/or fainted.
RButler: You don't understand. Only people who have attended Obama rallies
Did the republican party in Florida FORCE the democrats to have the primary early and the democrats allow themselves to be forced into this and had no say so? EVEN Though the National DNC said there are rules and you have to follow the rules?
OR did the democratic party decide to do it on their own and the state allowed it?
And if they did it on their own KNOWING FULL WELL that they were breaking the rules, then why are they whining about it now?
So what exactly happened that the Democratic party in Florida decided on an early primary?
Libsrule: There is something I don't understand. Did the republican party
In answer to your questions YES. In Florida the state runs the primary not the party. The republicans knew full well what they were doing and the democrats, who are in the minority in both state houses, could do nothing about it.
WASanford: In answer to your questions YES. In Florida the state
So this was a ploy by the Thug party knowing the democratic national committee would disallow the delegates?
And to what end?
Was the Thug party THAT prescient?
Or should Florida just be written off forever since they don't seem to be able to do anything right with regards to elections. Has Florida become the "special" kid in the family no one should talk about?
Libsrule: So this was a ploy by the Thug party knowing
That is not true. 1) Democratic state Senator Ring stated he supported this change to make Florida relevent. Even after they were reminded they could be stripped he stated he would rather have the earlier vote than have the delegates seated.
And on Jun 11, 2007 - the Florida Democratic Party leadership unanimously accepted the Jan 29th date. There was no disagreement - they all supported this.
Obama voted to intervene in order to sustain Terry Schiavo's life support. It was a complete misuse of the House to inject themselves into the lives of those families. Another bone-headed mistake, an example of excellent judgment.
SocialConscience: Obama voted to intervene in order to sustain Terry Schiavo's
I hate to say it, but I think the Republicans had the right idea. As a consequence they cut the number of delegates in MI and FL in half and let the candidates campaign. I wish the DNC had done that since it would have seated the delegates, while at the same time punishing the state parties for the early dates. That way the states would have had a degree of influence, but not as much as they could have. Now we have a mess with no fair way to solve the issue. Those of you who think it was fair are ignoring that their were rules. Obama has shown that his numbers increase when he opens offices, volunteers are movilited and they make phone calls and knock on doors. Without that he is so much less known than Hillary, and was especially so in January.. That didn't happen in FL or MI so these just weren't fair elections. When you add that voters were told their votes wouldn't count, it becomes even more clear that now counting them isn't fair either. It's a mess and without a new primary or caucus you just have to go with the rules that were set before the voting started.
loria: I hate to say it, but I think the Republicans
The Florida primary could not have been more fair. No democrat campaigned in Florida and all of the candidates were on the ballot. It may cost the Obama camp part of it's lead, but the delegates from Florida need to be seated and allowed to vote. At least that is, if you don't want Florida going for Ralph Nader in the general election.
WASanford: The Florida primary could not have been more fair. No
It wasn't fair because people stayed home and did not vote because they knew the delegates would not be seated. THAT"S why it's not fair. Plus, Clinton did several "fundraisers" before the "primary" and had more exposure in the state than the other candidates. As for blaming the Republicans, there was a Democratic lawmaker in FLA who initially came up with the grand idea of moving the primary up contrary to party regulations. Once that ball got rolling, the Republicans were happy to assist the Dems in breaking their own party's rules.
greejambri: It wasn't fair because people stayed home and did not
The following is reasonable way to resolve the seating of the Florida delegation that respects the State's voters, both Democratic candidates, and the fact that the Florida Legislature ignored the rules of both the Republican and Democratic Parties and moved the date of their primary, with full warning of resulting consequences:
1) The State of Florida's 210 Democratic delegates will be reduced by 50 percent, and 105 delegates will be seated at the Democratic Convention. (Similar to what the Republican Party has decided as a consequence of changing their primary date.)
2) The 105 delegates will be apportioned based on the Florida primary results, imperfect as it was, with Clinton receiving 50 percent or 52.5 delegates; Obama 33 percent or 34.5 delegates, and Edwards 14 percent or 14.5 delegates.
The above resolution will remove this topic as a continuing contentious issue, prevent a costly re-vote, however administered, yet seat the Florida delegation in a fair manner.
Now, let's move on to resolve Michigan.
Gregory Dunkling
Stowe, VT
''That is to say once and for all, to settle this, we will be voting on Jan. 29 with our candidates on the ballot,'' Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen Thurman said Sunday. ``At the end of the day, we came down on the side of having a fair and open election.''
Thurman said a majority of the more than 200 party leaders from across the state supported the decision, but a vocal minority of activists said it would handicap the party at a time when it should be capitalizing on the Republican administration's dwindling popularity.
''It's a Thelma and Louise strategy of backing up the car while we're driving over a cliff,'' said DNC member Allan Katz, a Tallahassee attorney involved in the negotiations., Another DNC member who lives in Tallahasssee, Jon Ausman, went so far to compare Thurman's negotiating tactics over the past month to ``George Bush in his handling of Iraq.''
http://www.fladems.com/content/w/florida_democrats_launch_drive_to_defend_early_primary_date
sorry grijambri, I attributed the nonsensical comment by WASanford to you.
My apology.
"The Florida primary could not have been more fair. No democrat campaigned in Florida "
I hand it to you, it is rare for people to make an argument for their point of view that so explicitly points out the very absurdity of their own position.
Let the delegates be seated, give them 0.1 vote per delegate, and make them wear orange jumpsuits.
Let Hillary have them. Obama wins anyway so why waste money on a re-do?
president that he would do that to the Fla. voters....work behind the scenes to NOT get a fair vote...hey, wait a minute, hasn't it happened BEFORE?????Gee, he must be following the "footsteps" of our wonderful "COOMANDER IN CHIEF, the Cheater himself, George BUSH...now, if Obama just has a brother he could name as governor of Fla.,.....
Did the republican party in Florida FORCE the democrats to have the primary early and the democrats allow themselves to be forced into this and had no say so? EVEN Though the National DNC said there are rules and you have to follow the rules?
OR did the democratic party decide to do it on their own and the state allowed it?
And if they did it on their own KNOWING FULL WELL that they were breaking the rules, then why are they whining about it now?
So what exactly happened that the Democratic party in Florida decided on an early primary?
And to what end?
Was the Thug party THAT prescient?
Or should Florida just be written off forever since they don't seem to be able to do anything right with regards to elections. Has Florida become the "special" kid in the family no one should talk about?
http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/broward/blog/2008/01/ring_views_florida_as_more_relevant_than_ever.html
The bill that changed the date was passed through a throughly bipartisan effort - 37-2 in the State Senate and 118-0 in the State House.
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=35049
And on Jun 11, 2007 - the Florida Democratic Party leadership unanimously accepted the Jan 29th date. There was no disagreement - they all supported this.
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/chrnothp08/fdp061107pr.html