More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Taylor Marsh

Taylor Marsh

Posted: January 19, 2010 04:00 PM

What If Coakley Had Followed Our Lead?

What's Your Reaction:

Once upon a time... Martha Coakley said she would not have voted for the House health care bill with Stupak in it.

ScreenHunter_01 Jan. 19 08.35

Now, after ignoring her own initial instincts, a decision that is taking her over a cliff. Martha Coakley's campaign is pushing back on White House CYA that started long before the polls closed, putting the blame squarely on "national Democrats," via Ben Smith.

But seriously, if the Democratic leadership and Martha Coakley had followed the lead of many liberals and progressives in the party we wouldn't be in this mess in Massachusetts. Democratic arrogance in not listening has compounded the problem. It's especially infuriating when the people pushing back on the Democratic health care bill as it currently stands represent the majority of this country.

"...I believe that I would not. ... I think that particular amendment that was put in really is a poison pill for this bill. It's taking two steps back... Health care reform was to provide more care for people. A health care reform bill that takes steps backward on women's constitutional right to choose is a mistake. I do not believe that we have to take a step backward on women's rights. - candidate Martha Coakley, November 9, 2009

If the outcome is like the foreshadowing, critical mass against Democrats has been reached in Massachusetts. What came before in Virginia, New Jersey, but also NY-23, will have finally exploded in the Coakley-Brown race. But even if Coakley pulls this out, which is a long shot right now with Coakley seeing herself as the underdog at this stage, something that is truly astounding in blue Mass. Democrats better understand the collective rage against the Democratic leadership, which is floundering badly. Rape flier ads just reveal the desperation, as do racist and sexist squeals during a campaign flame out, with the whole thing sparking an MSBNC pundit battle.

Barack Obama has also failed when it comes to an effective message Democrats can run on, whether we're talking about health care, economy or jobs, not understanding that Democratic candidates can't simply run on being part of Obama's orbit, which so far is leading Dems into a 2010 ditch.

Candidates also need to follow their own instincts, as Coakley's candidacy proves. Not what the party, a famous family or what the widow of the past Kennedy patriarch wants. It's tough stuff, but I found Vicki Kennedy's presence in this race horribly out of place and even in bad taste; that it was ineffective makes it worse. Though who can blame Mrs. Kennedy for trying? But besides Martha Coakley deciding to "go dark" after she won the primary, with a campaign operation less than stellar, the elite Democratic establishment is part of this loss, too.

As for instincts, Coakley had the right ones a few months ago.

Where was the Martha Coakley who said what's above about the health care bill once she won the primary and began running against Scott Brown, but also as another term for Teddy? The quote above was on the Boston Globe website under the heading: Coakley decries health care bill. This is the Martha Coakley I met when I interviewed her before she won the primary.

In fact, where was the Martha Coakley who said this about the Hyde amendment on "Hardball"?

MATTHEWS: If the subsidies include (INAUDIBLE) even though the Hyde Amendment says the federal government cannot spend a dollar on abortion. How do you square that?


COAKLEY: Well, Chris, look, this is the first day I've announced this. This health care bill has so many pieces that are critical and complicated.

MATTHEWS: Right.

COAKLEY: On that particular issue, that's where I am. I know there are going to be a lot of ways that those pieces will fit together. But I can't really answer you right now how we square that with the Hyde amendment, but...

MATTHEWS: Well, just a general principle--as a general principle, Madam Attorney General, do you think the federal government should be, as part of the health care reform, subsidizing abortion? Yes or no.

COAKLEY: Yes. And I think--yes.

MATTHEWS: OK.

COAKLEY: The short answer is yes, and I think they will have to change other laws to make them consistent. I've always felt that way.

There is no way a hail Mary, fly in, here's the star visit from Pres. Barack Obama was going to turn around this race. What's alarming is if the White House or anyone else actually thought it would. More likely Obama found himself in a position that if he hadn't he would have been pilloried, so it was an opportunity to take his new talking points out for a spin. They need work. Action on tangibles that voters can feel would be better.

And maybe Martha Coakley was doomed to lose anyway. But if she'd run on her own terms, sticking to her own beliefs, ignoring the ploys of the aggrieved Vicki Kennedy and the Democratic leadership who wanted to drape her in Ted Kennedy's political shroud, because Coakley was not anything like Teddy, even if she'd lost she'd have done it her way.

Other than that, here's the view from the Massachusetts right. It says the rest.

Regardless of the outcome, it won't change the analysis above.


Read more reactions from HuffPost bloggers to the Massachusetts special election

Taylor Marsh is a political analyst, with podcasts available on iTunes.

 

Follow Taylor Marsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/taylormarsh

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:00 PM on 01/20/2010
Have you ever wondered why the turn out was so high in your district ? Could it possibly be that teabaggers moved into your district to corrupt the vote or that they used absentee ballots while living in another state ? Most of those teabaggers are not Ma. residents . I smell a dead fish here .Am I the only one questioning this vote ? Certainly people can't be that dumb to vote another Republican to the Senate after 8 years of Bush and the disaster he left behind ?
12:43 PM on 01/20/2010
Coakley needs to take the blame for her own loss ,she ran a terrible campaign and the choices we were given for Democat candidates was pretty sad to begin with if you ask me .

I am a Ma. resident and I don't think that the reason Coakley lost was really because of lost jobs and disenchantment with Obama because frankly Ma. was not effected as badly as some states have been by the poor economy ,"btw given to us by Bush and his administration not Obama,".

Anyone whose a Democrat and voted for Brown do you remember what Mitt Romney did for our state ? Better hope Brown doesn't do worse ,Romney was only a governor ! Guess some of you have short memories and forgot . Shaking my head in disbelief of how easily you all played into the Republican propaganda .
11:36 PM on 01/19/2010
I think that both Martha Coakley and the Obama administration can share the blame. Coakley should not have been complacent and shouldn't have assumed that winning the primary was winning the seat. Over-emphasizing that it was "Ted Kennedy's seat" was unwise because it (and every Senate seat) ought to be the people's seat. Just because I don't trust Brown to make it the people's seat doesn't make it any less true. It made a great campaign slogan. Obama and his team have been so wrapped up with "inside baseball" in DC that they have not done a good job of connecting to the average Americans who are feeling the economic pain and profound anxiety.

Democrats need to pass health care reform but also need to focus like a laser beam on jobs - jobs - jobs. It's not either - or. Make the Republicans REALLY filibuster - drone on until they drop, and agressively paint them as obstructionists. Acknowledge and embrace the fears of ordinary Americans, but also tell the good news. My IRA account was up 42% in Obama's first year after plummeting in the last year of the Bush presidency. How about yours?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Betsy Meier
social liberal - fiscal conservative
06:29 PM on 01/19/2010
This is not Obama's fault. This is Coakley's fault, plain and simple. She took the month of December off and then didn't campaign worth a tinkers damn. I know it's easy for the progressive Dems and the Hillary supporters to blame Obama for every thing that goes wrong, but that too is BS. And don't forget, Bill Clinton went and campaigned for Coakley a week or two ago. As Bob Schrum said, she didn't do a good job campaigning.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
07:07 PM on 01/19/2010
We're *way* past the Obama-Clinton primary wars, Betsy. I guess you also missed the part in my post where I wrote that Obama dropping in to help Coakley wasn't going to make the difference.

What is Obama's fault, along with a lot of other Democratic leaders, is that the President provided absolutely no leadership on health care for a year, even getting beaten by Sarah Palin's "death panels" squeal. His lack of leadership and letting Republicans hijack the health care messaging, ending in the bad Senate bill, led us to the powerful anger we've seen building from Virginia, New Jersey, even NY-23, and now in Massachusetts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Betsy Meier
social liberal - fiscal conservative
08:10 PM on 01/19/2010
I agree that we're way past the primary wars, but I also will say this, your followers aren't past the wars. And that seems to be the drum beat.

And I did see where you said that Obama dropped in to campaign for Coakley And to state that Deeds and Corzine should have won is laughable. Seems interesting to me that you would bring that up since you stated that Deeds was a terrible candidate and that Corzine had major problems. NOW, suddenly you can kick Obama around that it's his fault. Please!

I do agree that health care should probably have waited and instead jobs and economy should have been foremost on the Admins mind. But I agree with Joan Walsh tonight on Ed's Show. .
11:18 PM on 01/19/2010
IDK, the Senate bill did ban abortion, so it wasn't all bad

seriously, nationaly over 60% of americans wanted the "41st no vote" brown to win, so in a very real senss, Obam just got teabagged by the american people
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:07 PM on 01/19/2010
Another great post Taylor, but I'm afraid that the Democratic establishment will take this as a sign to move even further to the right. Sigh.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
06:09 PM on 01/19/2010
Heya UpstateSC. Yeah, you're not the only person who has written that to me.
05:48 PM on 01/19/2010
Just face it, all you liberal folks... Your message is being rejected.

Rejected - It is just that simple.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
05:59 PM on 01/19/2010
Well, Historybuff, your comment needs clarification.

What's being rejected is the message from elite Dems, from which I distanced myself a long time ago. I don't buy the current health care bill or the current Wall Street nonsense being dispensed by the Democratic "leadership," and neither do many HuffPo readers around here.
07:46 PM on 01/19/2010
Right. So they're voting for a teabagger instead.

I just came back from voting. 9th Norfolk.

I have NEVER seen turnout this high in this area in nearly 20 years, during some of the most hotly contested races in modern history. Ever. Period.

Rest assured, regardless of what the outcome is, the people have spoken tonight.

They have SPOKEN. Not argued ,not ployed. There is NOBODY in this state sending "message" votes tonight.

We are voting on healthcare.
12:56 PM on 01/20/2010
Excuse me but this vote was not all about the health care bill as you seem to want to make it .It was about leadership for Massachussets ,My state . Ma. has had it pretty good compared to some states and I think it was because we did have Democratic leaders fighting for us in Washington . Good luck now ! If people are so darn foolish as to not look at the whole picture before they make that vote then they better shut their pie holes when Brown does what Mitt Romney did to this state .Can't remember the millions or was it billions with all the law suits the Big Dig cost our state and Romney said he was a great business man ,lol. Where are your memories people ?
11:39 PM on 01/19/2010
trroof and:


I'm a Fan of Historybuff
04:57 PM on 01/19/2010
What once was a dream is looking more like a nightmare as Obama and his inner circle have taken government arrogance to the same level as Bush. They don't get it at all and apparently they are surprised about what is going to happen in Mass. They should have been listening to their base and acted more on principle which independents would respect a lot more than their corrupt dealings on health care. They have reaped what they have sown.
TryToBeFlexible
MENSA, Gay, Atheist, Believer in justice
04:20 PM on 01/19/2010
It is all Obama's fault. The buck stops here.

Trillions for big banks. Single payer, off the table before negotiations even begin. Invite Rick Warren to participate in the inauguration. Insult your progressive base.

I wouldn't spend the 75 cents for gasoline to run up to the polls to vote for a democrat now.

Get your act together, Obama. You are a miserable failure. I hope every miserable one of you loses so we can start over with some less corrupt guys.
01:29 PM on 01/20/2010
No TryToBeFlexable its your fault and the rest of you who want instant gratification and don't understand that the President doesn't make the laws he only signs them . Sorry you didn't get everything on your Christmas list but that is life now isn't it .You can't p[lease all of the people all of the time and you can't always get what you want. So stop the temper tantrums .