More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Taylor Marsh

Taylor Marsh

Posted: May 24, 2010 10:22 AM

Democrats Are Supposed to Know How to Use Government in a Crisis

What's Your Reaction:
2010-05-24-ScreenHunter_03May.2316.51.gif

There is simply no excuse after 30 days for the Obama administration to show such incompetence in managing the Gulf Oil catastrophe. President Obama seems aloof, uninvolved, with the White House more upset about reporters asking tough questions than anything else. That the Administration is still going full speed ahead on oil drilling even with evidence that oil companies aren't prepared for the exploring they're doing is irresponsible. From the New York Times:

In the days since President Obama announced a moratorium on permits for drilling new offshore oil wells and a halt to a controversial type of environmental waiver that was given to the Deepwater Horizon rig, at least seven new permits for various types of drilling and five environmental waivers have been granted, according to records.


The records also indicate that since the April 20 explosion on the rig, federal regulators have granted at least 19 environmental waivers for gulf drilling projects and at least 17 drilling permits, most of which were for types of work like that on the Deepwater Horizon shortly before it exploded, pouring a ceaseless current of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.


At least the White House is moving from whining to the press about pesky questions to having Thad Allen in the briefing today with Robert Gibbs.

The real issue is that this isn't what we expect from Democrats.

Obama ran for president and he's the manager in chief of the Gulf Oil catastrophe whether he likes it or not. He needs to start acting like he's in charge and illustrate that Democrats actually know what government's purpose is.

We expect Republicans to be incompetent when in charge, because they don't like government, want to starve it out of existence, and don't respect its purpose. So when they attempt to lead they stumble over themselves and end up making matters worse.

Democrats are supposed to know government's role, respect the force of what it can do and launch it into action using all means necessary when a national security crisis meets an environmental and economic one. President Obama has not shown that he knows what he's doing, which is a depressing a sight to witness. It's a Democrat revealing incompetence I've come to expect of Republicans.

It's true Barack Obama received significant campaign funds from BP. His decision to allow BP to control their volcanic spill at the beginning was correct. It passed that point two weeks ago.

The politics of this are the least of it, so hearing the princess of "drill, baby, drill," Sarah Palin talk about Obama's "connection with the contributions" with big oil like Republicans and Palin herself aren't the political poster children of big oil strains credulity.

Palin's comments would be hilarious if this whole situation hadn't long ago passed the political stage into wondering what we're paying taxes for if the federal government, especially under the auspices of a Democratic majority, can't get its act together to save one of our most valuable assets, the Gulf Coast.

Democrats are supposed to know how to use government power in a crisis to help the people. It's depressing to watch them flounder like inept Republicans.

Perhaps if I put it in military terms people would get it. This is a national security issue. The economics and environmental costs will be calamitous for one of our most precious regions, already suffering, further straining our economy. We are at war against the evil oil volcano that BP has imploded off our shores. We're at DefCon 1, people. All hands on deck.

Taylor Marsh is a political analyst out of Washington, D.C.

 

Follow Taylor Marsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/taylormarsh

 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hope not Hate
05:34 PM on 05/25/2010
BP is has NO interest or intent of "plugging" this oil geyser, because by law that would make this oil deposit off limits for future drilling. This is reportedly the second largest offshore oil deposit in the world, so from BP's perspective, which is profit only, closing the well is not an option. BP is determined to recover as much oil as possible and maintain access to this deposit. BP's patently absurd efforts thusfar are intended to keep the public from becoming restless while the Gulf dies.
The Obama administration is giving BP cover while they commit ecocide on the entire Gulf and Atlantic Ocean. Tragically, the whole corrupt lot of them can safely assume that Americans are so apathetic and dumbed-down by corporate media that they will literally die from this toxic apocalypse before they will rise up in protest.
03:46 AM on 05/25/2010
This oil spill is only an exclamation point on a long list of deeds and more importantly missed deeds that will open the path of the anti christ. These people look like nitwits and nincomepoops. I shake my head every day watching them all speak like strange robots from the planet Drone.
12:37 AM on 05/25/2010
What we fail to realize is that this is a "corporate security" issue. It becomes increasingly apparent that all three branches of our gov't are hired pawns of business, proffering reassuring tones to sooth the ruffled feathers of the masses while making certain nothing upsets the economic apple cart of dollars to the top. It's not really a matter of Democrat or Republican anymore. It's one megalomaniac or another padding their overfed urges at the expense of the nation's welfare as a socio-economic entity rather than just a place to do bizness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indie00015
11:48 PM on 05/24/2010
If we can put a man on the moon and make missiles that can blow up the earth, then we can sure as hell stop a leak on the ocean floor - even a mile down.
02:14 AM on 05/25/2010
Exactly what I think. If we aren't able to stop up a leak on the ocean floor, then we shouldn't make one in the first place. I am an ardent Obama supporter, but am truly disappointed by his decision to leave the solution of the problems up to BP. It's like asking a mafioso to try the capo.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hope not Hate
05:33 PM on 05/25/2010
That's obvious to thinking people. But most people are missing it.
BP is has NO interest or intent of "plugging" this oil geyser, because by law that would make this oil deposit off limits for future drilling. This is reportedly the second largest offshore oil deposit in the world, so from BP's perspective, which is profit only, closing the well is not an option. BP is determined to recover as much oil as possible and maintain access to this deposit. BP's patently absurd efforts thusfar are intended to keep the public from becoming restless while the Gulf dies.
The Obama administration is giving BP cover while they commit ecocide on the entire Gulf and Atlantic Ocean. Tragically, the whole corrupt lot of them can safely assume that Americans are so apathetic and dumbed-down by corporate media that they will literally die from this toxic apocalypse before they will rise up in protest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indie00015
11:47 PM on 05/24/2010
Taylor Marsh and I agree. Doesn't happen often, but she is spot on in this blog post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hiqutipie
Independent... Don't talk just Kiss ...
11:40 PM on 05/24/2010
Right on Taylor...

Everyone got tired of hearing all the government agents repeating BP talking points after the first week...Everyone knows its a difficult job to stop the leak, thats up to the Experts...Containment
of the spilled oil as well as clean up is what people want to know that the government is doing &
implementing...There are other cleanup materials ready to be used and they are not being used because BP is not allowing their use...

Bobby Jindal and others took the first steps the other day to taking the helm, though they should have done it weeks ago, announcing their plans to protect the wetlands & beaches etc...

The Dems should Heed the Call...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lukester
10:14 PM on 05/24/2010
Obama feels perhaps that there is no "appetite" in Congress for him to take over. When Congress is ready he will make the appropriate speech and the problem will be solved.
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
07:14 PM on 05/24/2010
“We expect Republicans to be incompetent when in charge, because they don't like government, want to starve it out of existence, and don't respect its purpose.” The last Republican administration grew the size of government and the national dept at an alarming rate. Incompetency maybe supported by this fact. Yet your assertion that the size of government is associated with its purpose is irrational. In your holding, government can know no bounds in order to satisfy your criteria of competency and purpose. Nor is your argument that Republican “want to starve [government] out of existence” supported when the facts show the opposite.

“Democrats are supposed to know government's role, respect the force of what it can do and launch it into action using all means necessary when a national security crisis meets an environmental and economic one.” What primal understanding of government’s role in a crisis is embodied exclusively in a Democratic administration?

Perhaps if you put your arguments in more unbiased terms people would get it.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-04-02-federal-spending-inside_x.htm?loc=interstitialskip
07:05 PM on 05/24/2010
Free yourselves of the corporate mind-**** and you will be ok.
But they are rich and you aren't.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
06:55 PM on 05/24/2010
I like a lot of Ms Marsh's writings but on Obama from time to time she simply comes unhinged.

I've criticized Obama for very nearly everything he's done since he took office and even before. But on this crisis he has done all he should have.
08:57 PM on 05/24/2010
"But on this crisis he has done all he should have. " Could you support this statement with facts or is this just how you feel? What exactly has he done and why do you think that there is nothing else to be done?
09:42 AM on 05/25/2010
even when it is supported by facts . they are dismissed by those who blame him for every wrong ever done. there is once again a lot of criticism and blame being offered by ms marsh and her ilk . but they know no more about how to fix this any more than any other other crisis that they have criticized the president's handling of.
and just like every crisis he's tried to manage. or mess he's tried to clean up. they offer no solution or expertise yet feel free to write opinion pieces criticizing him either with failed solutions or none.
and the trolls feed on them like manna from heaven. while the ones who created the mess or mismanaged the crises . or just plain made the mess either suddenly go silent. or jump on the blame wagon.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
09:42 AM on 05/25/2010
The government has been involved literally since day one. I think nothing else CAN be done besides what is being done. We're truly screwed and running around doing things just to look like we're doing things is a good way to make it worse.
10:03 PM on 05/24/2010
I also question whether he has done all he should have - what, exactly, has he done? It seems it involves encouraging BP to do a good job and leaving it at that. Meanwhile, he continues to support the same activities, with continuing government approvals of the same kind of drilling that resulted in this spill. He also continues to support expanding the area in which this type of drilling can take place.

Obama has done nothing except pray that BP will solve the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
09:42 AM on 05/25/2010
And what would you have him do? BP is unequivocally better equipped to handle this than the Government.
09:57 AM on 05/25/2010
have you bothered to find out what he has or is doing. or are just busy trolling for hit pieces from people like this author who has no expertise on the subject but writes an opinion piece that feeds your bias.
President Obama ain't perfect. But a lot of us are very tired of the media and pundits trying to convince us when we and they know better that he is responsible for everything that is wrong with this country.
I for one am very tired of the gop trying to rewrite history to excuse bush and blame Obama. tired of people like progressives that act as though they are solely responsible for him being president therefore he needs to do things their way. yet they sat silent while bush was destroying the country.
tired of the tea party being held up as though they speak for the majority.
tired of the media pundits and gop leaders who suddenly become crises experts over night. who demand this president behave like no other president history. during a crisis that effects them either personally ,economically-they want superman.
but when it comes to what's best for the common majority-they want him to sit back and let things be .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Manx
05:04 PM on 05/24/2010
Obama has responded to the BP catastrophe just like the quintessential technocrat that he is. When he wanted more facts, he wrote a letter to BP and appointed a commission to study the matter.
Boy, that'll show 'em!
09:58 AM on 05/25/2010
and mccain would have................?
05:01 PM on 05/24/2010
Yawn. Yet another article screeching: "Obama, DO SOMETHING!!!!!" that doesn't say what exactly he should be doing. It doesn even give a vague hint about what he should do. There is probably nothing that can be done to make much of a dent in the unfolding catastrophe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Manx
05:40 PM on 05/24/2010
For starters, Obama can stop relying on BP for vital information. Initially, BP lowballed the amount of oil gushing into the Gulf. They have no credibility. Obama should demand factual information from the various government agencies and independent scientists at his disposal, which is needed to assess the ecological impact and planning for environmental recovery efforts.

Whether it's justified or not, the perception is that Obama is not doing enough. In politics, perception is reality. And what is Obama doing about that perception? As reported in the NY Times yesterday, Obama is now talking about future drilling in the Gulf. He said, "Because it represents 30 per cent of our oil production, the Gulf of Mexico can play an iimportant part in securing our energy future. But we can only pursue offshore oil drilling if we have assurances that a disaster like the BP oil spill will not happen again."

Note to Obama: We HAD such assurance from BP before the Deepwater Horizon explosion. During the permit process, BP said such a disaster was virtually impossible. Also, Obama says the Gulf produces 30 per cent of our oil. Wrong. The oil BP is drilling goes into the world market and is not just for domestic consumption. Obama seems politically obtuse.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
06:57 PM on 05/24/2010
And what difference would any of this make? The only "perception problem" involved is that of Fox News and their "perception" stays the same no matter what he does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luvangelHussein330
09:56 AM on 05/25/2010
For sdtarters...it was the team the President sent down to the Gulf that told BP that thier initial numbers they gave on how much was being spilled was incorrect. The President deosnt need to force BP to give factual infromation when he already has his team of experts and sceintist there gether this informatin since from the day the rig blew up and sank.
From day one those in the media have been trying to paint this some how as President Obama's katrina, which if you look at how inviolved he and his admin has been is false. All teh media is trying to do now is make good on thier first assertion.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/deepwater-bp-oil-spill
The only way to get proper assurnces is to have proper regulations which we didnt have before and should be easy to obtain now.
You might want to read your last paragraph to clear up your own obtuseness...if that even a word, but you get my drift. The oil BP drills for the most part does go out to the world market and we only get 30% of that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
05:57 PM on 05/24/2010
He could start by talking about his plans to nationalize BP, and how he's going to fight every day until it gets done. That would be a start.

Obama will never be elected to a national office again; with his "response" to this disaster, he's lost the entire south east U.S. Better get a primary opponent to take the nomination from him in 2012, unless you want to hand Republicans the presidency. I nominate Alan Grayson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luvangelHussein330
09:20 AM on 05/25/2010
BP IS NOT a US company that the President of the US can natinalize....dah! And in several of his press confrences related to this issue he has said that he intends on fighting this everyday.
Maybe it will help you to know what realy is going on:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/deepwater-bp-oil-spill
04:42 PM on 05/24/2010
"The politics of this are the least of it, so hearing the princess of "drill, baby, drill," Sarah Palin talk about Obama's "connection with the contributions" with big oil like Republicans and Palin herself aren't the political poster children of big oil strains credulity."

Big oil Republicans? Let's see...who is BP favorite politician? Who have they donated the most money in their entire corporate life to? Oh, yeah. Barack Obama.

Surprise, surprise. The Savior is corrupt. But we silly small-government types already knew that. All politicians are corrupt. Always have been, always will be. That's why you're wrong when you say
you're the ones who "respect the force of what it [government] can do." We do respect the force of what it can do. That's exactly why we want to contain it.

"BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics."

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-440501
05:05 PM on 05/24/2010
"Surprise, surprise. The Savior is corrupt. But we silly small-government types already knew that. All politicians are corrupt"
-------------

You're right about the "silly" part. You so-called small government types are the ones screaming the loudest that Obama needs to do a Big Government takeover from BP. Frankly, I'm having a bit of difficulty feeling sympathy for the Red State residents who are now crying for Big Government to save them. BP has given them the "free enterprise" they voted for over and over again when they voted Republican -- and the rewards thereof.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
05:53 PM on 05/24/2010
Why would Big Oil give lots of money to the republicans? Why buy the cow when you get the milk for free?
07:09 PM on 05/24/2010
BP's CEO, TOny Hayward was Bu$h's Re$election Campaign Chairman and let's not forget tho$ $ecret meeting$ Cheney had with the BigOil execs and the minute$ still haven't been released so the back room Republican deal$ with BigOil and BigBanks and Big Defense Contractors continue to line their pockets.
04:25 PM on 05/24/2010
Obama's response....

Please. The reason Obama hasn't responded is because the spill is good for his policy initiatives. The worse the disaster, the easier it is to stop off-shore drilling. Nevermind that it's an ecological disaster. Nevermind that offshore drilling absolutely has valid and necessary place in our future energy policy if we're going to be competitive.

It's like his main main Rahm Emmanuel said, "Never let a good catastrophe go to waste."

BP ain't exactly bothered by the whole thing either. Hell, their damages are capped. They're only going to pay but so much anyway. In the meantime, they're heavily invested in alternative energy. Market leader in solar panels, in fact. What better way to overtake Shell and Exxon, who aren't quite so diversified.
04:55 PM on 05/24/2010
You've been listening to too much Glen Beck. Come back to the 21st century.
05:02 PM on 05/24/2010
BWHAHAHAHAH!!!!

That's the best you got you partisan hack!

Funny how you don't have problem with corruption in the white house now that your man's in power. Nooo! It's all A-OK now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
05:58 PM on 05/24/2010
Obama is just incompetent and corrupt--probably not evil.
10:01 AM on 05/25/2010
you have no solution but name calling . surprise surprise surprise
04:00 PM on 05/24/2010
Democrats know how to eliminate sacred Constitutional rights during a crisis. Which rights are the next on the chopping block? Only time will tell.
photo
Daphydd
Lets play some music
04:34 PM on 05/24/2010
And we all know how well Republicans respected the constitution after 911. This is NOT WWII, and we are not talking about rounding up Japanese Americans.
05:38 PM on 05/24/2010
The Democrats are just as responsible for the loss of rights that occurred after 9/11 as are the Republicans.