EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Taylor Marsh

Taylor Marsh

Posted: February 8, 2010 11:05 PM

Obama's Bipartisanship

What's Your Reaction:

Regardless of the obvious, Pres. Obama is going to re-engage by inviting Republicans to come into the room with their ideas on health care, with Kathleen Sebelius offering the following assessment, via HuffPost's Sam Stein:

Sebelius said that the president views the bipartisan meeting as a needed pivot to move reform forward. Asked if he will expedite the legislative process following his various sit-downs with congressional Republicans, she replied: "I certainly think so. I think he sees this as a step to actually accelerating the process forward. He wants to move forward. He wants a bill at his desk and he sees this as kind of closing the loop and let's go." ...

Once again, Obama's people are assuming Republicans want to play along. That Pres. Obama has the clout or they care enough about his charm to join in. It's certainly not his power to punish that bothers them, because he won't wield it. Reconciliation is something Obama won't consider.

Democrats didn't have to end up here. The solution was always a short list of health care specifics like portability, importation of drugs, anti-trust elements, as well as pre-existing condition exemptions as a stand alone beginning for health care.

But because of the lack of Democratic leadership, which includes a lack of will to use reconciliation, but also the craftiness to pull together a bill that had a simple way forward, Republicans are in a tremendous position. It's a political gift if they're smart enough to accept it, though there's no indication they're willing to be opportunistic if it's seen to benefit Obama. Though if you listened to "Morning Joe" on Monday, an alternate universe if ever there was one, Mr. Scarborough posited that Republicans were never offered a way into the debate, which is absolutely untrue.

Someone needs to keep people like Peggy Noonan and Steve Forbes away from Joe, because he starts saying things when the Establishment folk come around that make him sound like he's been wound.

This latest bipartisanship surge from the Obama crew is vintage David Plouffe, getting everyone in the room so that blame or credit is shared, with a new narrative able to be crafted afterward. But also showing his candidate in the light that got him elected, bipartisan Obama, the guy with no ideology. Not that has helped him so far, because leadership by its very nature requires a point of view and an ideological north so you have some place to begin, not to mention a passionate core people judge worth trusting, as they did during the election season. That is so way back when.

Though some still just do not understand or won't accept the basic sincerity of Obama's true political nature, which is always to craft a deal between two sides, no compass offered by the boss. Only one reason Republicans who say Pres. Obama hasn't been bipartisan should lose their pundit license.

Whereas deal making is always part of the political process, leadership is the jump, starting with the reality that Democratic policy ideas on health care are better, because that's a simple fact, except when Democrats don't make it simple, as they did with the health care bill that was loaded with everything but competition. The trick of the craft in the end to find Democratic ideals Republicans will buy. If they won't, then pushing them through in a marketable way that voters can understand is actually giving them something better than what they've got. However, this requires passion on policy so voters can see it's something worth accepting, instead of acquiescence for the sake of something hobbled together.

And as much as bipartisanship may save health care and give Obama his "win," it also straps him into a kumbaya position, as you can't offer a hand then get rough when Republicans won't take it. Though that's not a worry for Republicans who have never feared Obama's leadership.

Besides, it's not like the Republican base is up for it, with any nod to health care or the Democrats giving more ammunition to Tea Party candidates, who are already pressing Republicans very hard.

Taylor Marsh is a political analyst out of Washington, D.C.

 

Follow Taylor Marsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/taylormarsh

Regardless of the obvious, Pres. Obama is going to re-engage by inviting Republicans to come into the room with their ideas on health care, with Kathleen Sebelius offering the following assessment, vi...
Regardless of the obvious, Pres. Obama is going to re-engage by inviting Republicans to come into the room with their ideas on health care, with Kathleen Sebelius offering the following assessment, vi...
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:47 PM on 02/09/2010
This summit is not entirely about bi-partisa­nship. It is more about outmaneuve­ring GOP leadership and mobilizing public opinion against them. The problem with healthcare legislatio­n is with many outlandish charges that put the public in a bind on what to believe.

President Obama has all the cards. For instance, House Republican­s have given Obama a copy of their version of healthcare reform. That has given President Obama’s director of healthcare reform, Nancy-Ann DeParle, to dissect it and appraise her boss with her findings. One would not be surprised if Obama has also given a copy of that proposal to CBO for scoring.

President Obama has said that he will go line by line and ask Republican­s what is their plan on each item. For instance, Obama will ask them what is their plan to cover 31-million uninsured citizens? Obama will follow it up by asking them how they planned to finance it. Would it be by raising taxes or cutting social program and which social program? President Obama is planning to take them to the cleaners.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:00 PM on 02/09/2010
The fact of the matter is Democrats believe that government works, while Republican­s believe that the government does nothing right.

That simple fact, in and of itself, explains the current situation in Congress, as well as the way that the Democrats govern.

People always point to Bush getting things done with 52 or 53 votes in the Senate, and narrow majorities in the House for all those years, but fail to acknowledg­e the simple point that Bush and the Republican­s couldn't give a care if the government worked the way it was intended, because the didn't believe in government at all.

The framers of the Constituti­on wrote rules in the way both chambers of Congress were to operate. The Republican­s didn't care.

If they had something they wanted to strip the government of doing, be it privatizin­g Social Security, wrecking budgets with massive tax cuts, invading countries that didn't attack us, or hiring a private mercenary corps to fight those battles, Bush and the Republican­s pushed to get those things done, regardless of what the rules of governing limited them in doing.
05:45 PM on 02/09/2010
How many are ready to believe that Obama is in a personal competitio­n to show corporatio­ns that he is better at raping and pillaging America than Bush/Chene­y ever were?
10:04 AM on 02/09/2010
Here is what I believe. The democrats (and Obama) are pretty smart guys, or they would not have been able to get themselves elected.
So the idea that Obama is just dumb and doesn't understand that bipartisan­ship won't work, is kind of unbelievab­le.
Second theory, follow the money.
In reality, democrats and Obama are corrupt purchased agents of corporate America. They don't really want to pass any of this legislatio­n, so the continued incredible overtures to bipartisan­ship are a fig leaf, to try to hide their duplicity. Even if the Republican­s keep kicking them in the B@11s, they keep "trying for bipartisan­ship" because they think they can use that as an acceptable excuse to keep watering down the bills more and more.
Hence, Rahm getting so angry and insulting the progressiv­e base. The progressiv­e base is definitely getting in the way of this "have your cake and eat it too" democratic "leadershi­p". They want to be elected by people, and legislate for corporatio­ns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:52 AM on 02/09/2010
the problem is that obama seems to believe his own bullshlt. the dream of bipartisan cooperatio­n gave him the presidency but not continued support. you may remember the 2000 election where the soothing words of "compassio­nate conservati­sm" were spread on the troubled waters about 5 minutes before we went to the "dark side".

the appearance of an ineffectiv­e bunch of hypocrites dining on the big shrimp at dc parties while opportunit­ies slip away is infuriatin­g! the house, the senate, the oval office....­.the electorate has done what it can....
07:24 AM on 02/09/2010
Obama's lack of leadership on health care and other matters has helped push the country farther to the right which is hard to believe but true. He is playing bipartisan games instead of governing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Manx
02:40 AM on 02/09/2010
Obama wants to force Republican­s to put up or shut up. He will call their bluffs by having them vote on the specific issues. I don't think it will work because the sausage making will start all over again
and most people are burnt out on the process. A health care debate redux could hurt the Democratic Party even more. The proposed Senate bill would be shoddy legislatio­n. If Obama compromise­d it even more by acceding to some Republican demands, the bill would become even more watered down and more unpopular with independen­ts and liberals. Also, many will question his priorities and see the continued debate as a distractio­n from the most important issue of creating jobs.

Personally­, I followed every inch of the debate for months but now I'm so burnt out on health care reform talk that its making me sick.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
08:21 AM on 02/09/2010
Countess, you're expressing what I'm hearing from many readers.

As for the whole health care debate "making (you) sick," Manx, that's a great way to put it. It's hard to fathom how Democrats have let the debate get so out of hand, but they certainly have.

The problem with Obama's continued approach is that there is nothing in it for Republican­s if they sign on to the Democratic plan. They can't afford to hand Dems a win on health care, which adds to our FDR domestic legacy. That's been their approach from the start and now that it's an election year with just about everyone sick of hearing about health care, without anything concrete moving forward after over a year, no one wants to hear more about the sausage making.

That said, who knows, maybe Obama will get Republican­s in a room, turn on the C-SPAN cameras and something miraculous will happen.

One thing is for sure, spending all this time on health care to come up empty is a very bad outcome and a huge "win" for the right, something I sure don't want to happen.
11:04 AM on 02/09/2010
Bipartisan­ship? The Police do not consult criminals on how to do police work. The Democrats should not consult the social criminal GOPranos on health care or just about anything else including national security. 9-11 appeared a GOP failure and resulted in death.

If you want to see health care enacted into law, regular citizens should take action and sign this petition at

http://www­.change.or­g/actions/­view/i_dem­and_the_co­ngress_and­_the_presi­dent_enact­_a_strong_­public_hea­lth_care_i­nsurance_o­ption

Thank you.