More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Taylor Marsh

Taylor Marsh

Posted: June 9, 2010 11:18 AM

On Ladies' Night, Bill Clinton and Sarah Palin Help Deliver

What's Your Reaction:

Nothing represents change in a tough election year* like a woman.

Since Hillary Clinton's historic presidential run for office, the 18 million cracks have created a political opening. Sarah Palin was the first through and she used her clout to make room for others. It's just too bad the Republican women rising are against women's individual freedoms. But make no mistake about it, the collapse of the Republican brand has allowed the ultimate outsiders, women, to find a way in. As for the new comeback kid, after the Halter scare that caused the runoff, she changed and won.

"Organized labor just flushed $10 million down the toilet." - White House Official

The biggest winner last night was Blanche Lincoln, who was bracing for a loss, which showed in her face during her speech. William Jefferson Clinton wins too, which I know will drive some people crazy. It's a heartbreaking loss for movement progressives who came so close, but their challenge made Blanche Lincoln a better candidate. It was a serious confrontation to elite power that had every establishment Dem quaking, which, from Ben Smith's quote above, reveals they didn't like it much. You can see Lincoln's response in the ad after Halter forced a runoff. This battle is the stuff that makes for eventual victories. That said, Arkansas is a right-to-work state and there is little to no union support inside the state. So, what was missed was pretty obvious, with outside labor unions coming in and pumping money into Halter's campaign, the image was pretty easy to exploit. But not even that reality should take away from the importance of what movement progressives accomplished. Some are writing Lincoln off, and she'll have to raise a lot of money. November won't be easy, because the energy will come from the right, with no help coming from the left.

As for Labor's response to the White House pettiness, it's a classic:

"If that's their take on this, then they severely misread how the electorate feels and how we're running our political program. When we say we're only going to support elected officials who support our issues," said AFL-CIO spokesman Eddie Vale. "When they say we should have targeted our money among some key house races among Blue Dog Democrats -- that ain't happening."


"Labor isn't an arm of the Democratic Party," Vale said. "It exists to support working families. And that's what we said tonight, and that's what we're gong to keep saying."

I joined my first union, AFTRA, when I was still a teenager, with others coming later. Unions are struggling, but the disrespect paid to them through anonymous White House flacks is beyond insulting. If you want a middle class in this country, see unions. My husband, who is a blue collar man, has enjoyed good wages and benefits, because the threat of unions coming into the gas company kept them honest.

The hottest commodity from ladies' night is Nikki Haley, who will face a runoff on June 22. The good old boys just couldn't take her down. Even after the slime thrown her way, she still came in first and her brand image is through the roof. Dave Wiegel made a good prediction last night on Twitter: Prediction: Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) will gave the SOTU response in 2011. She's also got a presidential glimmer and being governor of a Southern state doesn't hurt.

Carly Fiorina will be up against Barbara Boxer for the U.S. Senate. Two tough women fighting it out, this race will be one to watch.

If you're keeping score, both Haley and Fiorina were endorsed by Sarah Palin. She can help raise money and rev up the troops, which has made for a very good 2010 for Palin. Her clout continues to matter as she uses her power to help other women rise.

Meg Whitman spent over $81M to get it done, but she'll run against Jerry Brown for the California crown. She's gone to the right to win the primary, so it will be interesting to see how her prior policy stance on things like immigration will be used against her.

...and what can you say about Sharon Angle, Nevada Tea Party spoiler and gift to Harry Reid? Seriously, I've got nothin' on this one and my husband spent his life in Nevada. I also spent time there, so I can say that Nevadans don't like politics as usual. I did a story during 2008 about my husband's kids, all of whom backed Ron Paul. They've got a very independent western streak in the state, with Harry Reid not particularly beloved. No matter how wacky Ms. Angle sounds, I guarantee you Sen. Reid will not take anything for granted.

It's taken a very long time but after the failures of Republican men, including Bush's presidency, which was a big spending Administration, plus the disastrous campaign of John McCain, including his collapse on the economy, women are taking their place on the right. They're coming from all ends of the Republican spectrum, with some of the display sure to offer awkward moments, but they are definitely energized. Republicans are seeing the rise of the female candidate, even if their politics stand in the face of women's freedoms that we've fought to win. That's something they'll have to explain, especially with the rise of ultrasound bills across the country that demand a woman be challenged before taking care of her own body as she sees fit.

Republicans did dodge a bullet, because Orly Taitz went down. Thinking about Ms. Taitz playing the Katherine Harris role in 2012 should give everyone nightmares.

As for former Pres. Bill Clinton, he's had a very good 2010. He helped keep the Pennsylvania seat once held by John Murtha; has been an inside dealer for Pres. Obama, even if the White House's machinations backfired; but likely made the difference in Arkansas, though to what end is not clear, as Mr. Halter was very likely a much stronger candidate for November. Clinton also worked behind the scenes for Maine Senate President Elizabeth "Libby" Mitchell. In 2010, Clinton Democrats continue to show their prowess.

Something, however, is definitely missing. Where are the Democratic women rising? Since Hillary Clinton, well, as I've been writing for months, the new action has been on the right.

* TM NOTE: The first line has been edited, due to proper chastising by Rachel Maddow. It is indeed not an "anti-incumbent" year, but is a tough election year amidst a political paradigm shift with no clear landing place in sight.

Taylor Marsh is a political analyst out of Washington, D.C.

 

Follow Taylor Marsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/taylormarsh

 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iMissMollyIvins
Middle-aged, Middle class, Midwestern Populist
01:56 AM on 06/11/2010
Just a few thoughts -
"It's a heartbreaking loss for movement progressives who came so close, but their challenge made Blanche Lincoln a better candidate."
____________________
As my dear Grandma would have said, You can put frosting on a +urd and call it a cupcake, but in the end you're still asking me to swallow a mouthful of sugar-coated $#it... and pay you good money for the privilege.

As for The Queen of the Iquitarod's endorsements - Fiorina already had what she needed for the nomination: The Money. And Haley was better served by Jenny Sanford's endorsement than Caribou Barbie, and let's face it, Jenny Sanford is probably the reason she endorsed Haley in the first place.

I have no stomach for Corporatist DLCers. I give President Clinton his due, but his Neo-Liberal ideology and legislative triangulations were as much of a detriment, if not more, to the middle class, working class & the poor people in our nation as the Republican'ts under Bush The Elder.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
11:37 AM on 06/11/2010
Hi iMissMollyIvins.:-) I was hoping you'd weigh in.

I would have liked your grandma. I wonder what she would have thought of Buttercup?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hiqutipie
Independent... Don't talk just Kiss ...
05:36 PM on 06/10/2010
You sure you're not a Psychic Taylor...

You seem to be seeing & calling the future before it happens...I think you're more Independent then Liberal...LOL...

Personally, I don't care if you are Democrat or Republican, right or left...The Old Boy Network of both parties should have been dissolved long ago...And what is the Answer to that...Strong Independent Women that can make their own Argument and then back it up with both guns...

Women are 50% of the population, 50% of the work force etc...Its time for Women to Balance out the Halls of Power with 50% of the Voice in both parties...Think like a Man but always act like a Lady...There have always been Great Women throughout time and there are many Great Women today like Taylor who wouldn't compromise their values, standards or Beliefs for any party or special interest or corporation...Hell why stop there...

Men have always Respected Strong Smart Women, how could you not, they're like your mom, Sweet & Humble, Demanding & Scarry if you get them Mad...I Love them...& so will You...

PS: After the Tea Party and Sarah get done with the Republican Party, it may be the New Democratic Party...LOL...
11:54 AM on 06/10/2010
If Palin, Fiorina, Whitman and Angle equal a paradigm shit in politics towards women, then I pray to god it is not too late to slam that wreck into reverse!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
feliznavidad
Fierce liberal
01:46 PM on 06/13/2010
Right. Imagine how disappointed the early suffragettes would have been to see this mess be the result of their efforts. Pitiable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indie00015
10:57 AM on 06/10/2010
Bonkers. The idea that Blanche Lincoln's primary win in Arkansas is, in any way, positive for Americans, is bonkers. Her win did not reflect a "better candidate." Her win did nothing but reward her for sticking a needle in the eye of every progressive. She's a republican corporatist in Democratic clothing. Not ALL women are outsiders, as you suggest. Not Blanche Corporatist Lincoln.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
11:07 AM on 06/10/2010
I didn't say that, indie00015. I said the movement progressives that challenged her by backing Halter made her a better candidate. She won, but I agree that Halter was a better bet, though I'm not sure either are truly progressive.
10:23 AM on 06/10/2010
Bill Clinton was always Republican Light, especially when he caved into the anti government republicans when he said: "The era of big government is over".

Thanks for nothing Bill, you failed to get any improvement in healthcare for all Americans when you were in office for 8 years and now you helped elect a senator who killed the public option. We liberals now have no hope of ever improving the healthcare bill while this woman is in the senate.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
11:12 AM on 06/10/2010
I wrote an essay at my place chastising former Pres. Clinton for his role in backing his friend Blanche. Going after the unions like they both did was just wrong.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
09:33 AM on 06/10/2010
Sarah Palin most often has taken to endorsing Republicans that are already going to win. Very brave of her. But then pretending to be something important and riding someone else's coat tails is her MO.

And if you think it's something to applaud for women that these women on the right are taking the podium, think again. Everyone of them is on the right wing, or leaning right ever steadily to the right to appeal to the Puritans, leaning and leaning like little Towers of Pisa. And the women groups who are talking them up from NOW to the propaganda outlet New Agenda are on the SarahPAC payroll.

There's this new thing to try to paint Palin as the face of feminism. But she and every single one of her colleagues are anti-woman in their stances - unless there's something in it for them. They're hardly anything to be impressed by. Just good old fashioned gold diggers with important Republican men friends.
10:25 AM on 06/10/2010
I agree, and I'd like to what women think about this development; my opinion in the past has been yes, by all means, shatter the glass ceiling and get more women into office. But when the platforms those particular women happen to fly in the face of feminist issues... well, are women REALLY better off when people like Palin ascend to the national stage?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
10:47 AM on 06/10/2010
No. And not just women - no one is better off.

If Palin ever got into high office (which is unthinkable because the woman is as dumb as a stump and proud of it. She mistakes craftiness and opportunism for intelligence. She's crafty. So are rats.) So that would be the ultimate problem, and it would be a gaggle of her neocon sugardaddies that would running the White House. Sarah would be having her picture taken and riding on Air Force One with Piper.

But what policies she could go after (and would be Cheneyesque in treating the legislature and judicial like her flunkies) well those policies would be a threat to so many people, not just women. She finds gay people to be degenerates, so she'd try to demonize them and undo even level of progress on their civil rights, especially marriage. (She likes states rights unless the states are doing something she doesn't like. Then she'd be Big Sister.)....She'd insinuate religion into every aspect of government, appointing every evangelical pal she could....She'd deregulate everything, and I mean everything. Not just oil, thought she does love to dig a hole, but all business and industry. She'd unfund every scientific anything she could from medical research to climate. And her personal mission would be trying to overturn Roe v. Wade and if she couldn't she'd start trying to hurt both doctors and patients in any way she could find from pocket book to social stigma.

She's bad news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crowmeris
Rad-fem from way back when
01:01 PM on 06/10/2010
No, they are not better off, and neither are any who believe in freedom, equality, and the responsibility to improve one's brain.
11:53 PM on 06/09/2010
Wrong,.... Palin is not responsible for women making races this year......please!! Hillary Clinton rocked the planet in 2008 and almost pulled this off. If not for the Clintonites that ran her campaign as if it was a coronation she could have done better.

Most of the Gooper women are stalking horses for the failed polices of Bushco and the Reagan past, packaged in a different way.....there is no way that Carly Fiorina can get away with the crap she did to Compaq.....and how HP sucks.....today!!!! Same deal.....of Gooper....just in a different passage....and still BAD!!!

Taylor, don't fall for this message, these women have no belief in moving a woman's agenda forward....instead they will murk-it up!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Amy Siskind
President of The New Agenda
10:36 PM on 06/09/2010
Great piece Taylor. I have a lot of thoughts on why the Dems don't promote women. It's a darn shame. Eventually they will have to as a reactionary measure - but likely not until we have a first female, Republican president.
08:05 AM on 06/10/2010
Oh little Amy...you don't mean a word you say and, quite frankly, I don't care about your thoughts as a republican operative (as well as almost every Huff-Po reader who commented on your last little article).

You left off so many facts, in terms of reality and history, in your last two pieces it's mind boggling....

Your home girl, Palin along with the other the whopping 9 woman who showed up for the republican "booty call" in the last election, are known, unqualified, money fodder for the party---once again, Amy, your plea for woman to vote for women because they have a vagin*, isn't going to gather any "mojo" around the vast majority of American woman, especially here at Huff-Po.

We've been over this time and time again, Amy. Go home, read history, digest some reality and come back when you get an original idea instead of your a paid hack job for republican men who fake their commitment to equality. We smell you, now go girl...
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
09:35 AM on 06/10/2010
How big was your check? Or do you just share with Lafferty?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
godlessliberal
06:46 PM on 06/09/2010
Let's not get caught up in this supposed women's movement in the republican party. There are currently 18 female senators and 13 of them are Democrats. There are more Democratic women in the House as well. The Democratic party has been promoting women and women's rights for a very long time. I am happy to see that women in the republican party seem to be rising in the ranks even though I don't agree with their positions but this is no way setting a precedent..
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
11:21 AM on 06/10/2010
As I said in the last line, godlessliberal, "the *new* action has been on the right."

It is an interesting anecdote that the states are taking up ultrasound legislation to inhibit women's freedoms at a time when the Democrats own Washington, but no one is saying a peep about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crowmeris
Rad-fem from way back when
12:09 PM on 06/10/2010
Then you aren't paying attention. Florida alone: Janet Long, Nan Rich, Nancy Detert.

But of course, these aren't your "New Agenda" women, so they don't count, I suppose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
feliznavidad
Fierce liberal
01:50 PM on 06/13/2010
And you frame your debate but getting to pick the day that is "new." Baloney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Dugan
02:04 PM on 06/09/2010
Well remember when Obama told Rep Barry of AR in the winter that “2010 will not be as bad as 1994 because this time they have me”. implying he has better coat-tails than Clinton. looks like the opposite is true. Bill Clinton is the 1 who will keep 2010 from being as bad as 1994. Check out my Bill Clinton blog
http://adugan-billclintonblog.blogspot.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommom
12:33 PM on 06/09/2010
Paylin endorses candidates already miles ahead in polls and you claim Paylin helped them win.

Are you trying to be funny?
11:31 AM on 06/09/2010
How do you know Palin helped anybodys cause, it could have been all the money they spent.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Taylor Marsh
Author of the new book "The Hillary Effect."
11:42 AM on 06/09/2010
Hey, money matters, pxgabriel, but it's not like Palin can't raise it. Also see Meg Whitman who took a page from the boys' club of rich politicians and used her money to positive outcome.

It's my belief that Palin shined a pretty big light on Mrs. Haley, which helped immensely, as she was in nowhere land before it. Of course, Romney also endorsed her, but on the "mama grizzly" scale there is no comparison.

That said, Nikki Haley is a force in her own right, but all newcomers need to find the spotlight. I think Palin helped direct it to her.
12:35 PM on 06/09/2010
Agreed. As much as I hate to admit it, when Palin endorsed Haley, that is what sent her over big time. And what I really hate admit is that Palin is probably partly responsible for so many GOP women getting primary wins. I'm not a fan of Palin, but I can't deny her clout with the Rethugs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:57 AM on 06/10/2010
I love all the palin lovers of the world. They will support her UNFLINCHINGLY even while she dines on their flesh. They will lie there bleeding to death under her fork and still work up the energy to offer her a little more fava beans and Chianti..........and in their last breath blame their plight on the mainstream media.