iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Terry Newell

Terry Newell

Posted: July 5, 2010 07:17 AM

Looking for Love in Public Life

What's Your Reaction:

This is not about sex scandals, but if you thought it was, that may be a sign of how far we have strayed from the kind of love that should guide us as members of the political community we call the United States of America. In late June, for example, a woman running for Congress in Tennessee had this to say about the proposal of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro's plan for a new facility. The center, she said, is "designed to fracture the moral and political foundation of Middle Tennessee." A resident opposing the center at a public meeting earlier in June, commented that "Our country was founded through the founding fathers - through the true God, the Father, Jesus Christ." In short, why should we be doing anything to support another religion, especially one that, as another member at the meeting said, is "against everything that I believe in..."

Speaking of what we "believe in," 86 percent of Americans believe in God, and 79 percent say that religion is fairly or very important in their lives (Gallup polls, May 2007 and Dec 2009, respectively). So the question may be asked, what happened to the message, expressed in all religions, about loving thy neighbor as thyself? (In the Qur'an, by the way, there are several expressions for this, including: "None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.")

Unfortunately, too many of us are better at hate than love - at least in public life - and before you dismiss use of the word "hate" here as hyperbole, recall the dictionary definition: "to dislike intensely or passionately". Hate is practiced by politicians, by special interest groups and by individuals, such as some of the citizens of Murfreesboro (and plenty of other communities, to be fair). It is aimed at all kinds of Americans. Indeed, hate seems the coin of the realm if you want to purchase electoral victory these days. On the short list of those who get hated are liberals, conservatives, Tea Partiers, gays, lesbians, Muslims, illegal immigrants, legal immigrants, gun rights advocates, gun control advocates, Right to Lifers, Freedom of Choicers, Wall Street traders, big business, members of Congress, the President, government bureaucrats ... well, you get the picture.

Now hate does not necessarily mean violence, but it almost always means seeing those we hate as separate - as "them". Since it's not as socially acceptable to hate, we often disguise it through separating ourselves. So we have Red States and Blue States, the middle class and the rich, "average Joes" and elitists, followers of Rush Limbaugh and Rachel Maddow loyalists, Fox News and NBC news, etc.

But separation, to quote the candidate from Murfreesboro in a way that might surprise her, does "fracture the moral and political foundation." Separation is psychological violence. It can turn physical - as it did for Andrew Stack, who hated the IRS enough to fly his plane into its building in Austin last February.

Joining groups is not the problem. Americans are joiners, and our political system is based on contending groups that express strongly held interests. But when groups turn from having differences to isolating themselves in their separateness and then to hating, we cross an important line.

Martin Luther King Jr. received his share of hate in the 1950s and 1960s. He could easily have hated in return. But he knew - and often said - that hate destroys the hater as much as it threatens the hated. Racists, he argued, were hurting themselves and the South. Their hate was consuming them and destroying their potential to grow psychologically and prosper materially. King's answer: "We must meet the forces of hate with the power of love."

Such a message can get lost in psychobabble or bumper stickers, so we need to know what King meant. He often recalled that the Greeks had three words for love. Eros was akin to what we call romantic love; philia was mutual likeability, friendship. He was not asking his audiences, white or black, for either of these. If you're black, it was too much to ask that you like someone who lynches your neighbor and withholds your right to equal treatment under the law. What King preached was the need for agape, for "understanding, redeeming good will for all men, an overflowing love which seeks nothing in return... we love men not because we like them, not because their attitudes and ways appeal to us, but because God loves them." Agape does not discriminate between worthy and unworthy people, and it seeks not one's own good but the good of his neighbor. For King, this kind of love is essential to preserve and create community: "It is a willingness to forgive, not seven times, but seventy times seven to restore community."

It is this kind of love that is lacking in our politics today. Until we recover it, we will continue to fracture our society and our psyches. That recovery demands we act respectfully toward those with whom we differ and restrain the escalation of hateful words and deeds, even (and most especially) when they seem essential to "win". This demands courageous moral leadership from politicians and the leaders of interest groups. That recovery demands we speak up if hating goes too far. Imagine a massive demonstration demanding those in (and running for) Congress, and those active in interest groups, sign a "Contract for Civility" in their public behavior. That recovery demands that the broadcast media host reasoned conversations representing multiple sides of an issue, not one-sided position statements under the guise of "analysis" or shouting matches between those on the far right and far left. That recovery demands we see and feel the people behind their positions, their hearts not just their heads. If we truly love the United States of America, perhaps it's time we started loving Americans.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
09:05 AM on 07/05/2010
Religion has become almost inseparable from politics these days. Preachers speak hate of people who don't fit their particularly orthodoxies and politicians try to appeal to those folks who follow a specific preacher, just to get votes. I personally have started to avoid anyone who tries to tell me the virtues of a particular religion, because I believe if a doctrine is a good one it will manifest itself in the way the believers live their lives, not the way they are telling me they are living their lives.

And that's just my opinion --- not trying to convert anyone here. If my life is working out, the way I'm living it will speak for itself and so will anyone else's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
09:03 AM on 07/05/2010
Great commentary. It will be interesting to see whether the people who sometimes post hateful commentsin response to others can restrain themselves from snarking back and forth at each other --- I'm as guilty of theth as anyone else.

I've been thinking a lot about the subject of hate lately because there's so much of it around. Not more than there ever was, but maybe it is more accessible now because people are not as isolated from each other thanks to electronic communication and people are more likely to express their thoughts, loving or hateful, to the world than in the past when we just yelled at each other, got into fist fights, wrote sealed poison pen letters or made anonymous calls. Now we can post hate on sites like this under the protected guise of an avatar.

I believe hate is contagious, just like child abuse. An abused kid often becomes an abusing adult. A child who exposed to hateful thoughts will often respond, if the hate is directed at the child, by saying, "I hate you, too." And there's a kind of sick thrill in being able to express such venom. And mistrust of anyone who reminds the child of the original hate speaker will evolve. And the back-and-forth continues into adulthood.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Terry Newell
12:54 PM on 07/07/2010
Interesting thoughts; thanks for them. I think hate becomes easier when we know others agree with our hating. Technology does make it easier for us to find those who agree with us (and avoid those who do not). Martin Luther King used to say (echoing Reinhold Niehbuhr) that groups are more immoral than individuals, and there is now a lot of social science to back that up. So perhaps when people can easily find others who share their (hateful) views, they feel more willing to express that hate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
12:09 AM on 07/08/2010
Misery loves company. And being filled with hate creates miserable people.