iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
The Daily Trojan

GET UPDATES FROM The Daily Trojan
 

Community Colleges Need Alternatives

Posted: 04/ 4/2012 4:45 pm

By Jasmine Ako

You know that sinking feeling you get when you log onto USC's Web Registration, scroll to the course you really want to take and realize that there are no open spots?

Though USC students might face this problem from time to time, it's a common reality for students enrolled in California's community colleges.

According to the The New York Times, California's community college system has been hit particularly hard, losing $809 million in state aid since 2008. These massive budget cuts have hurt the number and quality of courses offered on public campuses throughout the state, where students fight to get the courses they need to graduate or transfer to their dream school.

Santa Monica College is one of the many schools feeling the harsh effect of budget cuts. The community college had to slash an alarming 1,100 courses in the fall.

To cope with this dilemma, the college plans on implementing a two-tiered tuition structure. The school hopes that students who are eager enough to register for a certain class will pay a higher price of $180 per credit hour, a significant markup from $36 per credit hour for regular classes.

SMC's method of dealing with low funding is too drastic. Finding a solution to California's massive budget cuts is far from easy, but students shouldn't be punished for the state's mistakes.

USC itself is a dream destination for many community college students. Of the 2011 transfer class, a notable 59 percent came from California community colleges.

Of those community colleges, SMC sends a significant proportion of students to USC. In fall 2009, 905 students applied to USC, of which 329 students were admitted and 173 enrolled, posting a 52 percent matriculation rate.

A chief reason students attend community college before applying to a more expensive four-year college such as USC is to save money. Pricier courses would undermine the true purpose of community colleges: providing accessible and affordable options to students from all backgrounds.

Gov. Jerry Brown is hoping to solve the problem with a tax-hike initiative, which will raise levies on upper incomes and hike the state sales tax. According to a March USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll, California voters mainly support Brown's new proposal.

The fact that citizens are in favor of a tax hike illustrates widespread recognition of the severity of the situation. Students, school administrators and citizens across the state should support the tax initiative on November's ballot, as it is one of the most straightforward and essential solutions to mending California's budget crisis.

In addition, the government needs to be held accountable for the effective allocation of funds in education. Better transparency and performance-based budgeting at the state and local levels could drastically improve how public colleges operate.

The Government Performance and Accountability Act proposed by the California Forward Action Fund is a great example of what could be done to improve the state's policymaking system.

The act requires state and local governments to identify funding before they create new programs and implement tax cuts. It also proposes to make legislation public three days before legislators cast their votes. If voters approve the act, it will push state and local governments to exercise greater fiscal responsibility.

Meanwhile, colleges should also implement some changes on their own -- changes that don't privilege students who can pay more.

One solution suggested by Clayton M. Christensen, a professor at Harvard Business School, and Michael B. Horn, the co-founder and Executive Director of Education at Innosight, were online classes. Christensen and Horn argue that online classes reduce teacher-to-student ratios in buildings, spread costs and ultimately help trim down expenses.

As California's state and community colleges continue to reel from budget cuts, demand from students is only continuing to grow. Alternative solutions should be fully explored and change must be effected at the top and through our own engagement.

Jasmine Ako is a senior majoring in business administration.

This post originally appeared in The Daily Trojan.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:27 AM on 04/07/2012
"Of those community colleges, SMC sends a significant proportion of students to USC. In fall 2009, 905 students applied to USC, of which 329 students were admitted and 173 enrolled, posting a 52 percent matriculation rate."
As soon as I saw that this kid is a business administration major (albeit a senior), the paragraph above really made a lot more sense.
It's not "proportion" unless you are making a comparison in portions or some kind of relative comparison, which we do not have here. The appropriate term is "portion."
Second, matriculation refers to being accepted to the university, not that you are going. It has to do with your eligibility to attend the university. Thus, the true matriculation rate is NOT 173/329, but 329/905 which equals about 36%. That is, those that applied versus those that are eligible (admitted).
Garbage math and verbal skills with very little statistical reasoning ability.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the business leaders of tomorrow.
08:14 PM on 04/10/2012
Point well taken, but I think you should relax a bit on the nitpickiness.
08:23 PM on 04/10/2012
But, thanks for pointing out my own mistakes. It will help me be a better writer/arguer - and businesswoman ;) - in the future!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Xoubuo
I call it, how i see it
12:33 PM on 04/05/2012
if the state offered Online or TV classes, it would not only reduce cost, but make it easier for them. That way they can offer a lot of classes and still allow more people to enroll by offering online classes and the only time they have to show up is to just take the exam.
09:56 AM on 04/05/2012
I went to community college (received my AS in Business Admin.) and university (BBA in Management), now I am getting my Master of Accounting. The education I received from the community college was more challenging then most of my undergrad classes at the university.

Something else this article pointed to that I don't agree with is putting more students in online classes. Every online class I took was just a "teach yourself" class in disguise. The teacher "assigned" things, like to take a test, but not one class had a lecture in video format or on a discussion board. These classes should cost half the amount for this very reason.
07:53 PM on 04/04/2012
If the state is not willing to pay the subsidy, it is reasonable for the school to charge the incremental cost of the classes. It is better to have the classes available than not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:39 AM on 04/07/2012
Yes, then at least SOME people will be able to take them. Those that are willing to pay more for them, sure, but there you have it. The alternative is that nobody gets to take the course.
It's like when you're a kid and you're fighting with your sibling over a toy and mom gets involved and takes it away from you both. Now nobody gets to play with it because both of you were too selfish to find some kind of compromise.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
rtgmath
There has got to be a better way!
05:49 PM on 04/04/2012
Good points.

As a community college instructor, I will tell you that we community colleges feel like the proverbial stepchild. The state colleges and universities (from which the legislators come) reap large bounties. The public school systems are showered with money which often seems misspent on a burgeoning bureaucracy. The community colleges, on the other hand, are told to do more with less. We are praised for our careful use of very limited resources, and rewarded by being given even fewer resources. Our teachers make less money than either the K-12 or the university teachers make, even though we have to have rigid credentials as well.

If some equity in funding is not established, the community colleges will eventually crumble. We do not want to see that. We value what we do for our students. Thank you for speaking up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zSpin2001
All your base are belong to us.
11:12 PM on 04/05/2012
Community colleges need to combine there effective play in the legislative branches of government. The community colleges also educated far more people than the universities. As an example for a state of which I am familiar. The University of Michigan receives more money in funding from the state than all 28 community colleges combined. I am a graduate of Michigan, but I also see the inequity of this and expect the system to collapse. The universities want our graduates, but don't want to allow a sharing of the resources...and I don't blame them. There seems to be a general defunding of education in favor of financial services and business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Twohill
12:47 AM on 04/07/2012
It's really a shame. I got an associates at a two year public college before I went to University and I must say that many of those courses were more demanding and challenging, and just taught way better, than many I have had at University. I worked hard, and learned an awful lot. The years I spent at University help me do a job, but what I learned at jr college help me live my life and think for myself more outwardly and with more diverse perspective.
Every student should get at least 30 semester hours at a community college before entering University. They really do a great job.