iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Giago

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Giago
 

Disguising Themselves as Indians Was an Act of Cowardice

Posted: 10/01/10 03:26 PM ET

There are two words in the following paragraph that jump out at most students of Native American history, but are probably impervious to the ardent participants of the Tea Party movement.

The two words appeared in a New York Times article titled "The Founding Fathers Versus the Tea Party" by Ron Chernow. He wrote:

Like many popular insurgencies in American history, the Tea Party movement has attempted to enlist the founding fathers as fervent adherents to its cause.

The very name invokes those disguised patriots who clambered aboard ship in Boston Harbor in December 1773 and dumped chests of tea into the water rather than submit to the hated tea tax. At Tea Party rallies, marchers brandish flags emblazoned with the Revolutionary slogan, 'Don't Tread on Me' while George Washington impersonators and other folks in colonial garb mingle with the crowds.

Of course the two words "disguised patriots" are used to conceal a fact of history or to revise history. I remember that as an elementary student at Red Cloud Indian School on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation we used a history book that sugar-coated, ignored or revised history as applied to Native Americans, but I vividly recall the picture in this book of patriots disguised as Indians as they dumped boxes of tea into Boston Harbor.

As Mr. Chernow was want to reveal, those disguised patriots were impersonating American Indians in hopes that the act of insurgency they had just committed would be blamed upon the Indians. They certainly were not dressed in the typical patriot outfit they usually wore and not one of them was dressed as George Washington.

George Hewes, a member of the band of "Indians" that boarded the ships in 1773 recalled the event. He said:

It was now evening and I immediately dressed myself in the costume of an Indian equipped with a small hatchet and I and my associates denominated the tomahawk, with which, and a club, after having painted my face and hands with coal dust in the shop of a blacksmith, I repaired to Griffin's wharf where the ships lay that contained the tea. When I first appeared in the street after being disguised, I fell in with many dressed, equipped and painted as I was, and fell in with me and marched in order to the place of our destination.

Why in the world would these tea party patriots disguise themselves as Indians to carry out an act that was illegal at the time? Chernow writes, "The Tea Party movement has further sought to spruce up its historical bona fides by laying claim to the United States Constitution."

If the Tea Party wants to "spruce up its historical bona fides," its members should honor its real history by attending all of the Tea Party rallies dressed as American Indians and not as George Washington.

Thomas L. Friedman wrote, "The Tea Party that has gotten all the attention, the amorphous, self-generated protest against the growth in government and the deficit, is what I'd actually call the "Tea Kettle movement" because all it's doing is letting off steam."

Attire appears to be an important element of the Tea Party routine and they proudly don the uniforms of the Revolution or drape themselves in the American flag or parade as Uncle Sam or George Washington. They dress in every costume of the early protestors except in that of the American Indians they impersonated, which in the minds of most Native Americans was an act of cowardice. This alone causes some to question their revision of history.

As Friedman wrote:

And how can you take seriously a movement that sat largely silent while the Bush administration launched two wars and a new entitlement, Medicare prescription drugs -- while cutting taxes -- but is now, suddenly, mad as hell about the deficit and won't take it anymore from President Obama? Say what? Where were you folks for eight years?

The American Indians of 1773 had every right to fear the consequences of that tea-dumping party that night in the Boston Harbor. An entire village of Indians that had converted to Christianity was massacred and burned alive by American patriots seeking revenge for the actions of a few renegade Indians. They were called the "Praying Indians" and they became prey to the patriots because they didn't know one Indian from another and so they murdered the Indians that were available.

The Tea Partiers will continue to do their thing, but it concerns me that they are emulating a group of patriots who gained fame and notoriety by impersonating American Indians. At least they should be truthful about this act of deception.

Tim Giago, an Oglala Lakota, is the editor and publisher of Native Sun News. He was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard with the Class of 1990. His weekly column won the H. L. Mencken Award in 1985. His book Children Left Behind was awarded the Bronze Medal by Independent Book Publishers. He was the first Native American ever inducted into the South Dakota Newspaper Hall of Fame in 2007. He can be reached at editor@nsweekly.com.

© 2010 Native Sun News





 
 
 

Follow Tim Giago on Twitter: www.twitter.com/N/A

There are two words in the following paragraph that jump out at most students of Native American history, but are probably impervious to the ardent participants of the Tea Party movement. The two wor...
There are two words in the following paragraph that jump out at most students of Native American history, but are probably impervious to the ardent participants of the Tea Party movement. The two wor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:22 PM on 10/03/2010
Act of cowardice?

You mean like slandering the people who kept you and yours from becoming the toilet of Europe.

How about a "thank you" instead.
10:12 PM on 10/03/2010
Yeah, the Native Americans did real well by way of the colonization of America, your ignorance of history precedes you.
10:36 PM on 10/03/2010
No, your ignorance of history is blinding.

If you think it would have been so great for the natives had there not been a revolution, then go ask your friends to the south how it worked out for them when just one European super power decided to lay claim to it.

In the city I am in right now is a Spanish capitol building, with french roads, native land marks and a German port. America was being carved up between the powerful and the natives were a consideration that not all were willing to tolerate.

Not very many people would have given you a place to call home, with your own laws (for the most part) and respected your right to live your life in peace. How many Native Americans fought against the crown, right besides us and considered themselves Americans?

THEY WERE AMERICANS TOO

No my friend, you should be thanking God everyday that you live in the place called America.

Besides I do not at all buy into this guy, who is the head of such an NAACPish organization to speak for all native Americans. Not by a long shot.

How many Native Americans wear old glory everyday with pride?
photo
Rockwell
Recovering Reagan republican. 26 years sober.
01:07 PM on 10/03/2010
Fascinating analysis. Just as the patriots of Boston hoped to make Indians suffer the consequences for their actions (imagine the slaughter of Native Americans if their ruse had succeeded) the modern tea baggers seek to blame Obama for the crimes of republicans.

These are the same ultra conservatives who elected Bush/Cheney twice and remained silent while they destroyed the treasury and slaughered Americans in their illegal war.

But now all the sudden its Obama's fault!

I guess conservatives will never change. They like to dump the consequences of their own stupidity onto someone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sisa
01:03 PM on 10/03/2010
As a Mohawk I understand this article completely but the last thing I want is for it to be taken out of context by the Tea BaGGers and end up with a bunch of right wing nuts showing up dressed as Indians!
10:13 PM on 10/03/2010
more than understandable, although those "patridiots" are hard wont to change their devious ways.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Bullard
12:06 PM on 10/03/2010
What caused your tribe to become a plains tribe? Who were your tribes most feared enemies? What point of hygiene would have made it impossible for any of the tea partiers to have been mistaken for an actual Indian? Revisionist history anyone?
10:15 PM on 10/03/2010
"Revisionist history anyone? " Sure, it looks like you attempting to revise it, but your post is unintelligible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Bullard
12:07 AM on 10/04/2010
The Sioux were a woodland tribe pushed onto the plains by more powerful tribes to the east. Indians had no romantic notions regarding the killing of other tribes. It is very doubtful whether any colonist would mistake another colonist for an Indian.
photo
tnkeating
Dyslexic agnostic insomniac
10:28 AM on 10/03/2010
Tim you can write what you want into the history books, at the time it seemed like a good idea, but it was no act of cowardice, had they been in British uniform they might have been recognized and hung. This sounds more like your trying to convince American Indians that the founders were cowards, but we know the truth, thats what matters. There is iron in your words, no group in America has been more mistreated than the American Indian and for that no apology can sufice, but at least you got to go to Harvard and you well know that every country sugar coats their history. We, like you, are only human.
10:17 PM on 10/03/2010
How else would you describe disguising one's-self in order to look like a most likely and already prosecuted target in order to avoid repercussions...bravery?
05:26 AM on 10/04/2010
That we weren't "disguised" and people shouldn't believe everything published in Texas textbooks (or did you think Texas controlling text book content was a new thing??). Seriously, read a book.
09:12 PM on 10/02/2010
From Nevada. From a Blackfeet person: Hear! Hear!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
08:55 PM on 10/02/2010
They disguised themselves as do many revolutionaries to avoid prosecution for it later. The tea tax they protested was fundamentally illegal as per the agreements of the colonists with the crown they were self-governing and so taxes on the colonies had to be passed by the colony legislature, the British parliament had no legal authority to pass those taxes. That was the reason, a moral and legal objection, not personal greed. Nor was this anything other than obvious disguises, no one attempted to blame the attack on Indians.
07:45 PM on 10/02/2010
It's not clear that the original Tea Partiers were really trying to impersonate Indians or expected blame to be shifted onto Indians, since there was no band of Indians in Boston at the time that could have become the suspects. In the opinion of some historians, the Tea Party crew just wanted to disguise themselves so they wouldn't be recognizable as their everyday selves. An "Indian" disguise would disguise both their faces and their clothing. If there was any doubt about whether the revolutionaries were really Indians, the secret was certainly out before the end of the night. A group of the Tea Partiers exchanged words with a British officer speaking from an upper-story window, where he congratulated them on their "Indian caper" but said they had "not yet paid the piper."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueinannarbor
My micro bio is now full
07:29 PM on 10/02/2010
Good point. So now we can add cowardice to the lengthy and ever increasing list of pejoratives that align the 'Bagger movement with the most reprehensible qualities that human beings can offer. One must also consider that the people who participated in the Boston Tea Party in 1773 would have known absolutely nothing about the Constitution ratified in 1787, so maybe I should commend the current 'Baggers for their historical accuracy: Neither the original tea partiers, nor the modern day 'Baggers know jack about the Constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tuneone52
12:40 PM on 10/02/2010
I think we are seeing the true tea party now, The kid gloves have been removed and the bright finish has faded to leave only the stark underbelly of the G.O.P. This party is controlled by the same people who have brought this country to record debt and even worse reckless wars and the politics of fear! To call themselves the tea party is a joke this is not a tea party its a right-wing power grab, Like I have said all along if it walks like a duck etc etc!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12:40 PM on 10/02/2010
The left's hatred of America and the ideals of our founders is clear to see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiri the Unicorn
astronut
05:45 PM on 10/02/2010
I'm gonna nominate you for today's Unintentional Irony prize.

Those founders you're talking about, the guys who were all about democracy, equality under the law, separation of church and state and so forth-

They were the progressive leftist radicals of their time.

Political conservatives of the time may have said something like: "Defying the rule of an entrenched hereditary monarchy that claims a mandate from God? Setting up their own government and enfranchising common citizens? Why, that's preposterous! These people are criminals who are bent on destroying civilization!"
03:35 PM on 10/03/2010
They were libertarians who favored a very limited government. Communists/Progressives favor a government with no limits on its power. The exact opposite.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucidPanther
12:16 PM on 10/02/2010
Tbaggers also have the deluded belief that the Founders were fundamentalist Christians just like them.

They were mostly Deists ( like Jefferson ) and outright atheists ( like Thomas Paine, who Glenn Beck idolizes). Tgabgabers deny science and are anti-intellectual whereas the founders were intellectual men of science and products of the 'Age of Enlightenment' - influenced by Rousseau, John Locke, Voltaire, etc.

Tbaggers, on the other hand, are mostly ignorant, anti-science, anti-intellectual, illiterate yokels.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucidPanther
12:08 PM on 10/02/2010
Expecting Tbaggers to actually know history is expecting too much.

These are delusional people who start off being ignorant, biased, bigoted, narrow-minded, incurious, racist and convinced they are the greatest people on the planet on a mission from God.

Reasoning with them is like reasoning with the Taliban.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:06 PM on 10/02/2010
Dressing up like Mohawk warriors perhaps backfired on the colonists, because the tribe eventually went on to ally themselves with Britain in the Revolutionary War. It would be an interesting historical footnote to know if the colonists tactic was one of the underlying reasons which the Mohawk Tribal Council, viewing now the colonists as dishonorable and dishonest for impersonating their people, considered while deciding to form an alliance with the British.
02:29 PM on 10/02/2010
You have got to be kidding! The colonists were NOT impersonating Indians. The costumes were symbolic.
03:32 PM on 10/02/2010
Symbolic of their desire not to be identified.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gurukalehuru
cwtc7
12:24 PM on 10/03/2010
Absolutely sure of that, are ya?
11:21 AM on 10/02/2010
Poor attempt at satire, IMO. At least, I hope it is an attempt at satire. If anyone really believes that the colonists were really trying to pass themselves as Indians, our education system is in worse shape than i thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohio5470
06:52 PM on 10/02/2010
You say it is "satire" in one post and "symbolic" in another to describe the impersonation of Native Americans during the Boston Tea Party. Please cite your sources for this historical "wisdom." Since you seem so confident in your assertions I imagine it was an "accidental" omission and you have your sources ready for "enlightening" all of us.