iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Judson

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Judson
 

Wage Theft: A Crime You Can Get Away With

Posted: 06/07/2012 5:19 pm

Co-authored with Cristina Francisco-McGuire

This week, we authored a report grading states on how well they protect a fundamental workplace right: getting paid what you are legally owed. This right is so basic and common-sense that most people are still unaware of how commonly it is violated.

Wage theft, or the illegal underpayment of workers, has become so widespread, it affects millions of workers across the country and is nearly ubiquitous in certain industries: retail, restaurants, hospitality, day-labor, warehousing, child care, and construction. That's a lot of people -- already not getting paid enough -- whose bosses illegally make their paychecks even lighter.

The last time a detailed, multi-state survey was done, the findings were shocking. Researchers in three of our nation's largest cities interviewed thousands of workers who earned at or near the minimum wage, and found a wide array of workplace violations. Here are just the basic facts:

  • 64% of low-wage workers experience wage theft each week
  • 26% are paid under the legal minimum wage
  • 76% of workers who are owed overtime go unpaid or underpaid for those hours
  • On average, low-wage workers lose 15% of their income each year to wage theft - $51 per week, or $2,634 per year


Added up across the nation, this amounts to billions of dollars in earnings stolen from people who can least afford to lose it. In New York State alone, workers' losses are estimated at $3 billion per year, and wage theft costs the state $427 million per year in uncollected revenues. By depressing the consumer spending needed to fuel economic growth and by defrauding states and taxpayers to the tune of millions of dollars, this is a problem that affects all of us.

State laws and labor departments play a crucial role in prosecuting wage theft, filling in where enforcement of the federal minimum wage law is either lacking or not applicable. Even after the U.S. Department of Labor hired 250 more investigators in 2009, there is still only one investigator for every 141,000 workers -- nearly ten times fewer than there were seventy years ago, after the federal minimum wage was first enacted.

Our new report, Where Theft is Legal, shows that, if "cracking down on wage theft" were a class, 44 out of 50 states would fail one of the major tests: enacting strong laws against the crime. At the same time, several states have begun to move in the right direction. As we highlighted in another recent report, New York passed a law in 2010 that is now the strongest in the country. Illinois, California, and Massachusetts have also developed strong and innovative policies to help workers reclaim their wages and convince employers to abandon wage theft. But far too many states have done little to nothing at all.

So what would strong wage theft laws look like? The state laws and policies being advanced by worker advocates and forward-thinking policymakers are setting the new standard for cracking down on wage theft. In Where Theft is Legal, we pulled together the best of these policies into a comprehensive standard, and measured states' existing laws against it. These policies fall into three major categories that, together, comprise a strong wage theft policy:

Accessing Justice: The most basic provisions of wage theft laws are among the most important: which workers are protected, and whether the law gives them the tools to recover stolen wages. An often overlooked issue is the problem of employer retaliation against workers challenging wage theft. Unless employees have strong legal protections, the risk and impact of losing a job can be greater than the possible benefit of taking on one's employer.

Transparency & Accountability: Good recordkeeping laws help workers and their employers stay on the same page regarding wage rates, paydays, work hours, and payroll deductions. Not only do laws like payday notification and paystubs create a paper trail that makes it easier to process wage claims, they ensure that employers who play by the rules have nothing to fear.

Securing Justice: In order to clamp down on wage theft effectively, the law must incentivize workers to pursue claims, as well as deter employers from violating the law. This third major component of strong wage theft laws policies addressing those two imperatives: the amount in damages workers are able to recover through filing a wage claim, and the civil and/or criminal penalties for employers for violations.

Without any one of these policies, we lack the essential protections and tools to change the way unethical employers do business. Yet, our report shows that New York is the only state that receives a passing grade in all of these categories -- and even it only earns a C+ overall.

This week, we celebrated the 100th anniversary of the first state minimum wage law - a landmark achieved more than a quarter century before the federal government set a national standard. Today, forty-five states have their own minimum wage laws, and eighteen have set them higher than the national $7.25. It is up to states to lead the way on wage theft, just as they did in establishing the minimum wage.

The consequences of inaction are dire. Not just last week's alarming unemployment report, but the whole economic landscape shows signs of a tectonic shift away from our nation's vision of itself as a land of opportunity. Most of the jobs being created since the end of the Great Recession are in lower-wage industries where wage theft is rampant. As a result, millions of the people considered "lucky" enough to find work these days are not only landing in jobs earning less than a livable wage, but in workplaces where their pay is eroded even further by illegal deductions and underpayments.

If we do not crack the wage theft problem, the very notion of economic security will be a relic of our past. The already-weakened economy could weaken even further, meaning that even those of us fortunate enough to have jobs where we don't suffer wage theft could end up having to take one where we do, as millions already have.

Tim Judson is the Workers' Rights Policy Specialist at Progressive States Network, a national non-profit that works with state legislators and advocates to develop and advance progressive legislation in the states. Cristina Francisco-McGuire is Senior Policy and Program Specialist at Progressive States Network.

 

Follow Tim Judson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimPSN

FOLLOW BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:08 PM on 06/10/2012
The GOP again not funding the law on the books. So it is not enforced. This should be a felony and the law makers involved JAILED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
celticmaiden7475
11:34 PM on 06/09/2012
This is sad. I guess the rich need more money and these companies most likely think the poor won't fight it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stanley Bonk
"mad, bad, and dangerous to know"
09:29 PM on 06/08/2012
This piece only makes me more certain that there are only one thing that can be done to ensure fair treatment for all workers. We have to do what our grandparents and parents did in the wake of the Great Depression: Beat the Reublicans, and more importantly, their conservative overlords back into a corner. Tax them to within an inch of their lives and redistribute their wealth. The more of their wealth we confiscate, the less they'll have to meddle in the governance of the nation. We did this during the New Deal, and we had forty years of general prosperity.

Over time, as the people who suffered through the Great depression aged and died, the conservatives, beaten back, but not dead, waited until Americans were comfortable and unsuspecting before the started to creep back into positions of influence. For thirty years, bit by bit they disassembled all the safeguards our forebears set in place in the wake of the Great Depression, and within a few years, oopsie! Another economic meltdown! Surprise!
As a nation, we lived through this once before. We already know what to do. The only thing that's stopping us from doing it are the Republicans and the conservatives who control their thinking.
09:23 PM on 06/08/2012
Where you have a large pool of illegal workers, where these workers are employed for cash, under the table, this is to be expected. Illegal workers. Illegal employers. An entire illegal ecosystem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
06:21 PM on 06/08/2012
A another form of wealth extraction...and a form of state-sponsored financial terrorism....
04:43 PM on 06/08/2012
Well people don't want to support unions or don't have the guts to fight to unionize - let them live with it. Just like those in WISCONSIN - wait until the right to work gets in and you can work for half the pay and your boss can keep more money to buy his boat, cabin, and airplane.
09:16 PM on 06/08/2012
They've been told by their employers, whom they trust, that the unions will "steal your wages.". They've also been told by their employers, whom they fear, that if they join a union, the business will close. They've also been told by their employer, whom they believe, that people who join unions are overpaid, lazy people and if they join a union they won't make a dime more and the union dues will impoverish them while providing no benefits and that a union will make their working conditions worsen as the company naturally fights back against all the unreasonable union demands.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tim Judson
04:19 PM on 06/08/2012
This is a terrific dialogue - thanks for taking such an interest. A couple of points on the unionization question. It's totally true that the prevalence of wage theft - and misclassification of employees as independent contractors is a major piece of that - has become such a huge problem largely because of the decline in unionization. The best way to ensure that workers are paid what they're owed, when they're owed it, is by "enforcing" the law directly with their employer. In union workplaces, wage theft is not usually a problem because the workers and the employer work out all the terms of wage payment in the contract. Anything that violates it can be addressed directly, on a more level playing field.

The problem is, not only has union representation sunk to near non-existence in the private sector, if you think it's hard to challenge wage theft - try organizing a union! The law protecting workers' right to organize is far weaker than federal wage laws, and states are constitutionally prohibited from doing much to address that. Until we vastly strengthen the right to unionize, collective bargaining won't be a viable means of addressing exploitation and workplace abuses. That's not to say we need to make a false choice (unions versus labor standards). The labor movement didn't grow by picking one path over the other. Minimum wage, child labor, and occupational safety laws were all advanced along with unionization -- and we are in the same situation now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyfractal
Bioinformatician
03:11 PM on 06/08/2012
Cue pseudo-conservative claiming that laws requiring employers to pay workers what they are owed is socialism in 3...2...1...
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
02:42 PM on 06/08/2012
When corporate money determines who gets into political office, what incentive do they have to "do the right thing"?

IMPO..........A great many of America's woes can be traced back to this simple source....... corruption.

Our elected "representatives" no longer represent the PEOPLE of the United States, they represent the interests of corporations and the wealthy individuals who run them, those who fund their campaigns.

Until that changes, I doubt things will improve much for MOST Americans.

Publicly funded elections, and the elimination of ALL outside influence, is the answer to so many of America's problems.

If Congress WEREN'T corrupt to the core..............we would see it being offered.
01:03 PM on 06/08/2012
If the first thing you did when a paycheck hit your hand was to put 1% in a safe spot, you could start the climb to a position where you have better leverage. If everyone did this, we could take our entire socio-economic system back.

Continue living your life as normal, but just put that 1% away... you will barely notice it's gone. but in a year you'll notice you've saved up 1% of a whole year's income... and that living on 99% percent started feeling like 100%... and that you know you could live on 98% after that, or even 95% and that maybe after six-months you feel like you could live on 90%.

Maybe in a couple years you'll have 6-months living expenses saved up, and you'll start thinking about what you REALLY want to be doing with your time on this planet, and what percent your going to have to put away to take your next step of getting there.

It may not seem easy, but it IS simple.
04:45 PM on 06/08/2012
Get a life - people don't have health care or enough to eat. This article was aboutbstealingbsomeonesvwages.
02:11 AM on 06/09/2012
i'm sorry if you are one of the people not getting enough to eat. i hope you can get what you need to survive.

As for anyone that can afford a cup of coffee, or rent a movie, or hit a bar now and then... like me... i feel it is our responsibility to grab a hold of our paychecks and pull just as strong as the people stealing from us.
07:42 PM on 06/08/2012
See, that's what the article is all about, how employers take not just 1%, but 15% away from workers, and put it in a safe place, where the workers can never get it.

It sure works. Just not for the employees.
02:41 AM on 06/09/2012
I know. Greed has been creeping up on us for at least the last 30 years, and while voting and speaking the truth is important, I don't think it's possible to vote away people's greed, so I'm trying to come up with additional methods that will strengthen our resolve.

i've been tricking myself to get by on less and less over the last two years, and I believe the last thing greed wants is slaves with savings accounts.

if you think you can survive on 99% of your income, and just let 1% ride, I implore you to try it, jack.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
12:29 PM on 06/08/2012
I faced this problem in the UK in a slightly different way. I worked 5, 5-hour shifts in a 'Total' Petrol station. However we had to arrive 20 minutes early, to perform various tasks and faced more at the end of the shift that you couldn't begin untill signing off the till bang on the hour, keeping us there for 20 to 40 minutes, none of which was paid. so in effect most people worked 6 hours and got paid for 5. At the very least if you were quick it was still 1/2 hour per shift which over a month was 9-13 hours unpaid work. That's a lot of money when you're being paid min wage - well even less for me at the time because I was 18.
photo
CJ40inWI
I aim to misbehave.
02:43 PM on 06/08/2012
I hear you there. I worked a job where we had to sign in 15 minutes before the hour but we weren't paid until the hour started. This job managed to rip us off every way they saw fit to. We had to travel across the state sometimes 4 hours or more and we would get paid for 3.
09:09 PM on 06/08/2012
Some companies schedule you 8.5 hours and pay you for 8 and tell you that you are "required" to take a 30 minute lunch. You are required to clock in at the beginning of the shift and clock out at the end with the 30 minutes deducted from the total daily work time. Then they staff so poorly that if a worker breaks for that "required" lunch break the rest of the workers on duty are overworked. So peer pressure ends up forcing workers to skip lunch in order to not hurt their fellow workers. Complaining or taking your lunch strips you of your "team player" status. Peer pressure makes you cave to wage theft by the employer.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:22 PM on 06/08/2012
The Colorado Prison System pays workers $.60 cents per hour...or as Mitt Romney would say .."Thats still more than we pay workers in China"..
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
06:42 PM on 06/08/2012
I'm sorry..it's 60 cents per day...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
12:17 PM on 06/08/2012
Wage theft is rampant in the corporate, white collar world. Almost everyone is pressured into working 50-55 hours a week for a 40-hour paycheck.
09:02 PM on 06/08/2012
It's called "work-life balance" and there is a reason why "work" comes before "life" or "balance" in this nickname. Companies tout their "caring, nurturing work environment" in engagement surveys and culture building programs then load their salaried employees down with more work than three people can get done. They set their base pay on an hourly basis of 40 or 45 hours a week knowing very well that they can't possibly do the work in that amount of time then they hold them "accountable" for results that can only be obtained in 60 or 70 hours of labor. Since these exempt employees are mostly managers or professionals this work load is forced by reducing or limiting their direct reports and support staff to ridiculously inadequate levels. Anyone who complains or doesn't meet the expectations is first shamed, then threatened, then replaced if they don't see the error of their ways and shape up.
11:51 AM on 06/08/2012
This report only reaffirms the need for our work!
http://www.iwj.org/blog/psn-wag-theft-report
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joeyhas
09:52 AM on 06/08/2012
the problem is, people complain but they don't step up to do something about the complaint. DO SOMETHING ... make a change for once.
08:23 PM on 06/08/2012
Give up your paltry paying job in hopes that the government you complained to will recover your lost wages which you will now desperately need since you are unemployed. Brilliant...