More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Timothy Karr

Timothy Karr

Posted: July 1, 2010 01:46 PM

Have you heard about the battle over the Internet?

It's a power grab that involves lawyers, lobbyists, unscrupulous legislators, phony front groups and the most powerful telecommunications companies in the world.

They've aligned themselves against the rest of us -- the millions of Americans who use the Internet every day, in increasingly inventive ways.

They've opened their wallets to Washington. It's an investment of hundreds of millions of dollars and it's being made right now by AT&T, Comcast and Verizon -- the companies that provide broadband access to the vast majority of Americans.

These companies are chasing the ultimate payout: control, not just of the Internet wires that snake into our homes, but over the information that flows across those wires..

While this fight has been brewing for years, it's come to a head at a time when more and more broadband users are taking to YouTube, Twitter, Mashable and other innovations.

Right now, the FCC and Congress are weighing a series of decisions that could determine whether this decade-long explosion of Internet creativity was a short-lived experiment in people-powered media, or the beginning of an era of more decentralized, participatory and democratic communications.

Learn about the "Great Internet Heist"
20th-century media colossi prefer a return to the old ways, where a handful of gatekeeper firms operated the turn-on valve to all popular information. It was a profitable model that worked well for one-way communications like newspapers, radio, and television. If only it can be applied in age of flash mobs and FourSquare, too.


These media giants are spending a fortune to convince lawmakers and regulators to dismantle consumer protections on the Internet and give industry absolute power over the most important communications medium of our time.

Here's how they plan to do it, in four easy steps:

ONE: Buy Congress

The New York Times reported yesterday that AT&T, Comcast and Verizon executives and political action committees are among the top campaign contributors to lawmakers responsible for communications policy on the Hill.

"Political contributions from AT&T in the current election cycle reached $2.6 million by May 16, on the way to exceeding the total in each of the last three elections," according to the Times. AT&T has been especially generous to the campaigns of every Republican (most notably, John McCain), and all but three Democrats on the subcommittee that deals with the Internet in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. From 1998 through 2009, AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner Cable contributed more than $96 million to candidates for federal office, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics (and compiled here). In 2010 they're set to break all records for annual spending.

TWO: Mobilize an Army of Lobbyists

The phone and cable industry controls Internet access for more than 96 percent of Americans. Now, with the help of an army of lobbyists, they're planning to expand that control even further. In 2009, they spent more than $70 million on nearly 500 "K" Street lobbyists.

These agents for hire swarmed the FCC and Capitol Hill in a push to consolidate industry control over the Internet and kill Net Neutrality, the principle that preserves the free and open Internet, before the public (and public interest advocates like Free Press) gets a seat at the table.

Paul Blumenthal of the Sunlight Foundation recently revealed that cable and phone companies hired 276 former government officials to lobby for them in the first quarter of 2010. Included in this figure are 18 former members of Congress and 48 former staffers of current members of Congress on committees with jurisdiction over the Internet.

THREE: Spread Astroturf

Astroturf (or fake grassroots) groups surface wherever and whenever public policies threaten the corporate status quo. In Washington, they've spread like kudzu to envelope civic discourse over global warming, health care and financial reform in a tangle of corporate talking points.

The phone and cable lobby has been busily seeding Astroturf to kill Internet consumer protections. Notably they've funded FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity and Arts + Labs to paint Net Neutrality as a "government takeover of the Internet" and to dismiss as "extremists" the nearly 2 million people who have called on Washington to enact lasting Net Neutrality protections.

Their dirty little secret? Most of these fake grassroots groups routinely fail to disclose that their operations are fully funded by corporate special interests.

FOUR: Demonize the Public Interest

Behind every corporate lobbying juggernaut lies a smear campaign targeting public interest advocates.

For these smear-mongers, Net Neutrality is better known as "Internet socialism," "the Fairness Doctrine for the Internet," or simply the cornerstone of the Obama administration's frightening "vision of government ownership and control" over all communications and aspects of our lives. Net Neutrality supporters occupy the radical "fringe" of society, they say.

For Glenn Beck, Net Neutrality is a slowly creeping Maoism designed so that the FCC can "turn the Internet into a public utility, which means they have the power to control and regulate every bit of it."

If the uptick in scorn for an open Internet from the shill and talk radio echo chamber seems a little suspicious, look no further than the companies that still advertise with and support these merchants of disdain. You'll find many familiar names.

Everyone has a stake in the outcome of this fight, whether you're a YouTube "celebrity" or a chili pepper salesman, or someone in between. If you want to control your own Internet experience, you'll need to burst the industry spin, learn the facts about Net Neutrality, and get involved in the fight for open communications.

Now is one of those times that Washington needs to be reminded whom they really work for. And it's not AT&T and Glenn Beck.

-- Tim Karr is the Campaign Director for the media reform group Free Press. Free Press just launched "Corruption Road: How Corporate Money and Astroturf Pollute Media Policy" to track Washington's shady economy of influence: Check it out at: http://corruptionroad.freepress.net/

 

Follow Timothy Karr on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimKarr

 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:44 AM on 07/02/2010
The internet should be considered on the same level as the public library system. It shouldn't be controlled by the telcom's.
06:51 AM on 07/02/2010
These telecommunications juggernauts are projecting, they are the ones who want to control the information and things we do online. Anything the republicans of our times would back worries me and definitely demands more attention.
01:33 AM on 07/02/2010
What consumer protections are in place now? How are they in danger? Why hasn't the EVIL cable and phone companies taken control yet? A whole post about how much the have spent on lobbying and nothing else except for fear mongering. Great job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 AM on 07/02/2010
We like it the way it is now. No control on content, content flow or content sensorship.

Net Neutrality now and forever WITHOUT any private, profit or non-profit entity having any control whatsoever on the content.

DON'T MESS WITH IT !
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Timothy Karr
Free Press Campaign Director. Follow @TimKarr
02:42 AM on 07/02/2010
For a history of the stripping of protections from the Internet, see this timeline, which is linked to in the story above:

http://www.savetheinternet.com/timeline

For detail on the threat this poses to our online rights, see this report, which is linked to in the story above:

http://www.freepress.net/files/dejavu.pdf

For evidence of the ways these corporations have taken control over content, see this history, which is linked to in the story above:

http://www.savetheinternet.com/timeline

For further evidence on how these companies are strong-arming politicians to take away your right to choose what you do online, see this tool, which is linked to in the story above:

http://corruptionroad.freepress.net/

Sigh ...
09:42 AM on 07/02/2010
Thanks. The timeline link really shows the creep towards the weakening of Net Neutrality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Valkyrie Ice
Writer for H+ Magazine, and commenter at random
11:40 PM on 07/01/2010
history shows this attempt to prevent technological progress by monopolistic interests over and over and over and over and over.

The result?

The harder they try, the more success they have at forcing repression, the more they feed the development of the technologies which replace them, and the greater the violence brought against them when their repression is brought to an end.

It is an old story. Replayed far too many times. It always has the same end.

So will this. Even if they succeed, the outrage will build, and heads will end on pikes that much sooner.

By the end of the decade, they will be gone. They are dying, and this is their desperate attempt to stay alive.

But it's already far too late for them.
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
02:09 PM on 07/02/2010
I hope you are right, but John Robbins just posted a cautionary tale about the end of streetcars.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-robbins/what-ever-happened-to-pub_b_633585.html

Stay vigilant.
photo
Billy Jumper
Soon to be read independent author.
11:17 PM on 07/01/2010
People...on November 10th and EVERY election after, if it says "incumbent" on the ballot, vote against. Consider nothing else. Without re-elected Congress people, lobbyist money is wasted. Congress was never meant to be a full time employment anyway. Bring back the part-timers of Jefferson's time. It would relieve the rush hours in Washington, D.C. too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GunnyJ
I do my best every time.
08:30 AM on 07/02/2010
You are so correct my friend!
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
02:11 PM on 07/02/2010
Have to disagree with you there. There is nothing stopping corporations from fully bankrolling any candidate - including insurgent candidates, as we saw in the '94 Republican takeover of Congress. We need a more useful approach than "throw the bums out".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
10:23 PM on 07/01/2010
Aaaarrghhh...I was feeling hopeful until you laid out their plan so plainly. It's hard to see how they can fail. Great post, tho'. Thanks!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 PM on 07/01/2010
The USA has the best Congress money can buy. 95% of them are whores in business suits.
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
07:29 PM on 07/01/2010
Great article! Thanks so much for posting it.

The media and telecom companies are at war with each other for dominance, but far more than that, they are at war with anything that keeping them from monopoly control. Net Neutrality is exactly that.

So long as we have an open internet, they have a thorn in their side.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:25 PM on 07/01/2010
Just the fact there is only 6 comments here should tell you all we need to know about how "clueless" the general public is on this issue. Not a good sign.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
10:32 PM on 07/01/2010
It's heartbreaking how ill-informed the general public is...or should I say DISINFORMED. The double talk being used by the telecomms is very hard to penetrate. When I first read about net neutrality on the Huff, I had to read 5-6 posting before I could get a handle on the REAL issues. The MSM should be harping on this matter constantly, clearly outlining the relevant facts, just as this article does. There are few postings here, but on several comment sections previously, at least half the commenters saw net neutrality as a bad thing...the governmenty TAKING OVER the internet. We must find a way to clarify this issue before it is too late!
05:13 PM on 07/01/2010
Wrong.
Here is how they are going to do it;
1) Buy Congress
2) Buy Congress
3) Buy Congress
4) Buy Congress
They already own the Supreme Court, and have way too much influence over the Executive Branch, so that is all they need to do.
05:10 PM on 07/01/2010
We need more big companies with a lot to lose to stand up to the telcos. The only way to fight this is with money, and we the people don't have any.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:35 PM on 07/01/2010
Funny there are so few comments. I think the only legitimate government involvement in the internet would be that of ensuring fair and open competition amongst providers, and fostering the highest quality service for all Americans. All else is a threat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:54 PM on 07/04/2010
Unfortunately unregulated "competition" among provides have in the past lead to sky high water bills, electricity and gas prices. "Competition" is a free pass to gouge the American people to the point where they cannot afford the basic necessities of life..and today that includes an unfettered internet service.
photo
lightist
light as a photon, heavy as tungsten.
03:34 PM on 07/01/2010
Children always have amazing ideas about how to solve things that tax paying citizens seem to be unable to answer. Why not send an email to every child who's online how to keep control of the internet in the hands of those who care about what it is for us now?... I know, it's a childish idea.
02:54 PM on 07/01/2010
how do we stop it?

Get candidates to sign a legally binding contract

to outlaw all political contributions as the obvious bribery they are.

till then, money wins, democracy dies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:58 PM on 07/04/2010
I don't know if you've been following this on Huff but a few weeks ago, after Chairman Genechowski started to lean in favor of net neutrality, telecomm lobbyists descended on Washington and duped many, many of our representatives into signing a letter against net neutrality, altho' they couched it in such terms that it seems very pro-public. Many of the politicians who signed this letter are known for their social/progressive leanings, so I can only assume they were "duped" into signing the letter by industry shills. The telecomms are RELENTLESS in this fight and WE MUST BE TOO!!
03:07 PM on 07/04/2010
Duped? Bought is more likely.