More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tina Dupuy

Tina Dupuy

Posted: November 9, 2010 11:58 AM

It's an odd Americanism to elect someone to be in government who freely admits they don't like government. As if reluctance translates into competence. "Oh he'll be a great husband, especially since he doesn't believe in marriage." For some reason, we buy the premise of politicians begging to be a part of the thing they are, in theory -- against.

Son of an incumbent seven-term Texas Congressman, Kentucky's Rand Paul, in his first public statement as a government-employee-elect, said, "We've come to take our government back." And he's going to do that by cashing a government paycheck...reluctantly.

A politician who is against government is like an actor who is against entertainment. It's ridiculous. Because we hate politicians so much, the only way we can stand inking a bubble next to their name is to pretend they really don't want to do their job.

But do Americans actually know what the government is -- or what the government actually does? Failed Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle told a crowd during her campaign, "Government isn't what our Founding Fathers put into the Constitution." Yes, the framing document of the U.S. Government has no "government" in it.

At CPAC this year, Fox News Host Glenn Beck told his government-leery audience he learned progressivism is evil by educating himself at public libraries because "books are free." Yes, Glenn, they are "free" because the government funds public libraries with taxes -- a progressive plot.

RNC Chairman Michael Steele said last year, "You and I know that in the history of mankind and womankind, government -- federal, state or local -- has never created one job." It's a battle cry repeated by many a Republican, some now working in -- yes -- government jobs. Such a sound bite is often said in front of people employed by the U.S. Postal Service (the second largest employer in the country), public school teachers and the U.S. military -- jobs which the government arguably and factually created.

So there are deniers of climate change, evolution, the Holocaust, 9/11, AIDS, Obama's American citizenship, Separation of Church and State and a round Earth. People deny these things in the face of overwhelming evidence. Even though these things exist. They happened. But government deniers? Really?

For U.S. citizens, the most common interaction with the government is on the road. When you drive down the street or use the sidewalk, you are utilizing something your federal and local governments build and maintain. Yes, that's the government messing up your car's alignment. And along with bridges, dams, drinking water, energy, waterways, levees, public parks, rails, schools and sewage -- it's all in desperate need of repair. The American Society of Civil Engineers gave our infrastructure an average of a "D." They also reported it would take $2.2 trillion over five years to bring that grade up to a "B." The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (AKA The Stimulus) allotted $105.3 billion to infrastructure projects. So we're the richest country in the world yet we're spending only 5% of what we need in order for our citizens not to die from bridges collapsing and levees buckling.

This is the most basic thing the government can do: fix the potholes. Fix America. Business can't work if we don't have roads. Left, Right or Independent -- we are all dependent on a functional sewage system and an electrical grid.

In light of this, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said his party's top priority -- top meaning above all else -- is to make Obama a one-term president. So after the Bush Lost Decade of job growth and wages, a current 9.6% unemployment and other countries (e.g., Kazakhstan) outperforming us in basic literacy -- the Republicans once again opt for myopia. Instead of enabling the country on its most fundamental level to work -- the Republican plan is to throw a monkey wrench in their opponent's presidency. Their eye is on one prize: a one-term president.

This is like firemen refusing to come to your house to put out a fire because they want the Captain to lose his job.

Here's a message from the people "on the ground:" Knock it off -- and fix the potholes.

 

Follow Tina Dupuy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TinaDupuy

 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RustNeverSleeps
Hooah
02:05 PM on 11/13/2010
Excellent points Tina. Being anti-government makes no sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
12:55 PM on 11/10/2010
If government is not working effectively, one should be doing things like the National Partnership for Reinventing Government.

http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/whoweare/historyofnpr.html
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/whoweare/appendixf.html

One should not make blanket statements that government is horrible and wrong and blah blah blah.
10:40 AM on 11/10/2010
Republican obstructionism is not like fireman refusing to come to your house because of a grudge against the captain. No Kentucky, was proof that repubs don't even want the fire department to begin with. Because you know it's socialism to tax people for fire protection. Instead you pay a mandatory fee to get your fire protection from non professional volunteers.
10:17 AM on 11/10/2010
Fed Salaries Boom Under Obama

The number of federal workers earning $150,000 is ten times what it was five years ago—and has doubled during the Obama administration alone, USA Today reports. The group now makes up 3.9 percent of the workforce. Republicans in the House are now trying to block the president’s plan to raise pay by 1.4 percent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
12:44 PM on 11/10/2010
Yes because people working for 24 years in the same field deserve a massive pay cut.
05:02 PM on 11/16/2010
What part of the budget is this? 0.00000000000003%?
10:08 AM on 11/10/2010
A person doesn't hate government if they believe that government's role in the lives of its citizens should be minimal. Saying that they do is making a straw man argument for yourself. So the question is whether the author knows they are doing this or honestly believes their argument. A small amount of research into conservative/libertarian philosophy would inform someone enough not to actually believe what is written here. The country needs to have an honest, informed political debate not one based on mindless characterizations by either side.
10:41 AM on 11/10/2010
Your comment is very cryptic. Are you a libertarian and thus are you saying that while you know government is needed in some parts, that you disagree with "how big it is". If that is the case, perhaps you could list government works Ms. Dupuy talked about which you think should be done by private busisness. Let's cut the cr@p here, in a nation of 300 million people what programs serve no one and need to be cut. Or what programs do you want to see cut because you are against them for some personal reason. You asked for honest and informed debate, yet didn't offer a counter point to the main article. So here's a small samplining, what do you think needs to go: mail for everyone, public works, public education/continuing education, defense, water production?
05:06 PM on 11/16/2010
Define "minimal."

[Either silence or a list of programs that rich libertarians don't need, now that they are rich; this list does not include the most expensive and wasteful programs, like weapons systems and the like, nor does it include programs like wiretapping U.S. citizens.]

Now you see why we don't take you seriously.
10:18 AM on 11/17/2010
I am not rich. If your assumptions are that I don't think that there is waste in the military and that I don't think that the government oversteps its bounds at times those assumptions would be incorrect. Though I would rather be wire tapped than have to go through the modern scanners and/or an aggressive pat down at the airport. I don't really have anything to hide. The minimal role that I refer to is government not playing an active role in the economy. Not picking winners and losers or owning more than 60% of all loans and pretending that the problems existed in the private sector or because of the "free market". A free market doesn't have any party controlling 60% of the industry let alone the government doing so. The primary role of government in a free market economy is supposed to be maintaining competition and enforcing contracts. As long as a company has to keep its word and I have the option to take my business elsewhere I am good. When government does more than that its influence becomes corrupting. Most "regulation" enacted by government decreases competition. It usually benefits the same people the politicians are pretending to slap down.

I find your last comment to be kind of interesting. This because I feel that many more people believe my point of view than believe the views primarily expressed on this website.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curledup
05:28 AM on 11/10/2010
-snip-
It's an odd Americanism to elect someone to be in government who freely admits they don't like government. As if reluctance translates into competence. "Oh he'll be a great husband, especially since he doesn't believe in marriage." For some reason, we buy the premise of politicians begging to be a part of the thing they are, in theory -- against.
-snip

No shit, right?
08:41 PM on 11/09/2010
This article made the simple points that get lost in all of the sloganeering noise. Bottom line, in a Democracy the people are the government, so if you hate the government... well...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luckynewman13
Just your average, outraged twenty-something.
09:23 PM on 11/09/2010
"Government of the people, by the people, for the people"

If a democratic government can't function efficiently, than democracy itself cannot function efficiently. The fact that conservatives can't reach that conclusion amazes me...although I guess it shouldn't considering all the other stuff they believe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luckynewman13
Just your average, outraged twenty-something.
07:50 PM on 11/09/2010
thank you for writing this

I've always said that Reagan's "Nine Words" speech was bordeline treasonous.

Who was it that said, "Republicans always think that government doesn't work and when they get elected they try their best to prove it"?
06:22 PM on 11/09/2010
"This is like firemen refusing to come to your house to put out a fire because they want the Captain to lose his job."
Perfect analogy that illustrates the insanity of the Right.