We're doing well as a country when the Religious Right is unhappy. When James Dobson and Pat Robertson are upset, the canary is alive in the coal mine!
It's like -- look at us, we're still a democratic nation! The Ten Commandments haven't replaced the Bill of Rights. Evolution is still being mentioned in schools. Planned Parenthoods haven't been completely outlawed. And it's STILL against the law to stone homosexuals, pornographers and uppity women (pending a two-thirds majority vote in Congress).
I'm no pollster -- but I am willing to bet that there is a big chunk of folks who think that the Puritans and the Founding Fathers were the same people. Yes, the group of people that branded an 'H' on the cheeks of accused heretics were the same people responsible for the phrase 'freedom of speech'.
But that's what the Religious Right wants us to believe. It gives them a sense of entitlement. They'd have us assume a bunch of pious, simple folks clad in wool and buckles made their way across the Atlantic -- plagiarized the chapter in the Bible about forming a republic, called it The U.S. Constitution and then had July 4th fireworks.
The Puritan rule -- early 1600s, the Founding of the United States of America -- late 1700s. There is less time between the Lewis and Clark expedition and Sputnik.
John McCain now famously told Beliefnet that the United States is a Christian nation. Pundits and preachers alike parrot that this country was founded in religion. It's a nifty little sound bite.
The politically ravenous use it as a ruse. The tale is that in the 'olden days' things were somehow better than they are now. More innocent. Free of New Ageism's tolerance and dreaded hate crime bills. If we can just go back to that time -- if we can just get back to the time when we were more devout -- then we'll all be better off. It's elusive, but just around the corner.
It's a fabrication that an exclusively religious -- peaceful and ultimately blissful era ever existed. It can't happen 'again', because it never happened in the first place. The Puritans came to this land to practice THEIR religion without being persecuted and (at least in the Boston colony) quickly persecuted those who didn't practice their religion. Quakers were hanged and tortured for blasphemy. Native Americans were killed for being heathens. And sassers, gossipers and adulterers got their ears cropped or their noses split.
Looking back to colonial days for religious precedent is like looking back at the Black Plague for health care reform.
But for the politically ravenous, selling the idea that a Christian state is a birthright and a good idea -- gets the untaxed revenue flowing. Revising history and bleaching out some of the objectionable stains makes a new sense of purpose by making, well -- 'new sense'!
There is the idea that American Christian's are right and entitled "because we were here first!"
Long SIGH.
So when Christian Conservative leaders threaten to support a third-party candidate because they don't like Republican frontrunner Rudy Giuliani, it's a relief.
It's like when Rick Santorum failed to get re-elected; it proved that we can come back from the brink of theocracy.
And yes, we are having an 'ideological struggle' in the Middle East and that kind of seems like a different way of saying 'holy war', but if James Dobson doesn't see any of the GOP candidates as being his future lap dog -- there's hope.
Follow Tina Dupuy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TinaDupuy
Loading comments… 
The crediting of democracy to these people comes only from the fact they voted on their leaders. But, they disenfranc
The Puritans practiced democracy like the Soviets did. You had to be the 'right' people, the right religion, the right political group to vote in the 'democrati
Credit is given by many post WWII historians that, somehow, the practice of electing leaders in the early churches transfered over to the fledgling American government
We still have the same structure working its magic.
Is it not time to end their tax free privilege?
If we are all created equal why do people who undertake a predominat
Doesn't sound like seperation of church & state to me... looks a hell of alot like another special interest group looking favored status.
Helps to remember the puritans were run out of Europe, twice, for their extreme religious views...
Your article was impeccably timed; Moreover, it was thoughtful and precise.
The more frustrated America's evangelica
Dobson and company just haven't found someone yet who can "cast the first stone."
Perhaps a deal with Mephistoph
They are simply in it for the money and power, it's as simply as that.
I'll be looking into it further to hopefully counter the 'christian
In the early years after the Puritans arrived they were obliged to conduct lots of their affairs with and buy from the Dutch in New Amsterdam. These traders were clever, moneywise and enterprizi
Only about half of the folks on the Mayflower were reaching out to the American shores because of religious problems. They didn't start their journey in England but sailed from Delftshave
The other half of the folks on the ship were a motley crew of civilian and military adverturer
Half were called Saints and half were called Sinners.
There is a detailed diary by the first Governor of the colony, Bradford, online and it's worth a read if you are interested in the first religious/
Worth noting is that the city of New Amsterdam (now New York) was already in its earliest days at the time, the Portugese were fishing off what was to be Maine, and the Separatist
It is time that we at least acknowledg
No religious litmus.
The Constituit