More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tobias Winright

GET UPDATES FROM Tobias Winright
 

Protests, Police, and Pepper Spray: Nothing to Sneeze At

Posted: 11/23/11 03:11 PM ET

As a theological ethicist who also used to work in law enforcement, I feel obligated to comment on the latest incident involving police using pepper spray on Occupy Wall Street protesters. Garance Franke-Ruta over at The Atlantic provides, I think, a fair account of this, including most recently the incident at the University of California-Davis. In my view, based on the videos and the reports available to date, the spraying of kneeling students by Lt. John Pike was unjustified; it was excessive force and an example of police brutality. Most law enforcement officers are pepper-sprayed as part of their training so that they know what it feels like whenever they use it (plus, often when it is employed, some blows onto the officer, so s/he had be prepared beforehand for what it feels like). I remember being out of commission for a whole day following being sprayed directly in the face during training -- it is very painful and incapacitating. Indeed, Fox's Megyn Kelly should try it before making the silly comment that it's "a food product, essentially."

Now, I was not there, and I do not know all the details leading up to it; however, police are trained to remove protesters like these (their tactic of kneeling and making the police have to move them reminds me of similar approaches employed by some Catholic anti-abortion and/or anti-war protesters) through alternative means. For example, one officer can touch certain pressure-points (which still may involve some pain) while another officer binds protester's hands as they become unlinked to others' arms. The use of pepper spray in many of the videos I've seen (at UC-Davis and elsewhere) appears more to aim at punishing rather than at getting a threatening person to comply as safely (for all, the officer as well as the offender) as possible. Simply put, the use of force (including pepper spray, handcuffing, the use of batons, etc.) is not at all supposed to involve any notion of punishment or humiliation. Police are supposed to serve and protect all citizens, including those they regrettably have to arrest. For the latter, though, any force necessary to subdue the suspect should be proportionate -- just enough necessary to accomplish the job and in the least harmful way, if possible, given a constellation of available options). Unfortunately, not all police officers are trained well (and some who are trained well sometimes fail to adhere to that training). Also, not all departments possess and embody a "just policing" ethos, although much has been attempted to move toward "social peacekeeping" or "community policing" models in recent decades. Even so, I recall hearing a training officer at a city police department where I taught ethics workshops (and a department that emphasized community policing) once tell trainees while practicing arrest techniques for dealing with protesters, "There's no such thing as nonviolence and pacifist protesters." Not good.

To the protesters, though, I recommend adhering strictly to nonviolent methods of active resistance. I advise them to avoid shouting inflammatory things at police officers, and I would suggest avoiding doing things that may make police believe (wrongly) there's nothing else to do but use pepper spray. As Martin Luther King Jr. advised, try to persuade the police to become your friends. Be creative. Employ humor. The deafening silence of the UC-Davis students as their chancellor Linda Katehi and university chaplain Rev. Kristen Stoneking walked by was a witness to a force more powerful than pepper spray. I also have seen some photos of protesters doing such unexpected things (e.g., by hugging a police officer). After all, the protests are being done, in part, on behalf of those who happen to have a career in law enforcement; most police, I suspect, are not as well off financially as either the Wall Street tycoons or many of the college students (especially at prestigious universities). This, too, should be kept in mind.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:04 PM on 11/29/2011
I had a police officer as a customer who said "I'm a cop so that I get paid to bust heads".
11:18 AM on 11/28/2011
It's called "contempt of cop" -- Google it. Because police largely have a free pass on using "less than lethal" force, they either get away with passing judgement for "contempt of cop" completely, or receive the proverbial slap on the wrist.

How many news reports does one see of people who are either pepper sprayed or tasered, not because they present a threat to anyone, but because they're not "cooperating"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneFish
Various and assorted mutualistic microbial buddies
02:29 PM on 11/25/2011
Your first mistake is the idea of "supposed to". Copa are what they are: the instruments of violence that the State holds over the heads of all citizens. In recent decades they are insufficiently supervised. We're going to see more of same.
02:57 AM on 11/24/2011
Catothemuchyounger: First of all, I don't think the cops really had the right to ask the students to disperse. The cops were only asked to move the tents. The students had a right to be there so long as there was no danger to anyone, and from all appearances it was a peaceful protest. Second, the cops also have to abide by the law when they're dealing with infractions, don't they?

But what really burns me about all these "they deserved it, they shouldn't be protesting" comments is that every one of us has benefited from the courage and persistence of protestors through the centuries, from the (horrendously illegal) original Boston Tea Party to the (downright treasonous) American Revolution all the way through the anti-slavery movement, the suffragettes, the labor unions, and the civil rights movement. The rich and powerful never voluntarily give away their power; the people, united, have to demand it. The fact that we live in a free, relatively egaliatarian society where we vote for our leaders, women and minorities have the vote, and we all have at least a marginal opportunity to make a living wage without having to work 80 hours a week, is all due to past protests.
08:55 PM on 11/23/2011
"To the protesters, though, I recommend adhering strictly to nonviolent methods of active resistance."

Are you kidding!!! How about recommending that they follow the law while protesting? If they were only exercising their rights, there would be no need for the cops to do anything. They have no business "actively resisting" legal orders to disburse. I feel as strongly about the rightness of my political beliefs as anyone, but I don't believe I have to the right to make myself obnoxious by stopping traffic and occupying parks.

IMO, they should be ashamed of themselves that they are forcing the government to bring in riot police to enforce legitimately enacted and constitutional laws.
fo3angels
Equality is only equality if it is for all
09:54 AM on 11/25/2011
What law were they violating that required them to be arrested? What law were they even suspected of breaking that required them to be arrested? What legal order to disburse was given - specifically, on what legal grounds were the police standing when they ordered the UC Davis students to disburse?
fo3angels
Equality is only equality if it is for all
09:55 AM on 11/25/2011
I am glad you brought up riot police, by the way. What rioting was going on, using the UC Davis example, that 'forced the government' to bring in riot police?
05:54 PM on 11/25/2011
They were legally ordered to disperse.