Predator drones,
in this country's distant war zones, have played an increasingly prominent role in the up-armoring of the U.S.-Mexican border. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched its first Predatorin 2004, but only really ramped up drone use in March 2013. There have been approximately
along that border since. The agency hadplans to expand its ten-Predator fleet -- nine after a $12 million maritime drone
off the California coast, as those robotic planes are
to do -- to
. It was going to dispatch some of them to the Canadian border as well. (You never know, after all, what dark forces might descend on us from the chillynorth.) The CBP even got into the chummy habit of encouraging interagency drone-addiction by
its Predators out to the FBI, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and the U.S. Forest Service, among other places. You might say that the CBP was distinctly high on drones.
Only one problem: the Department of Homeland Security's inspector general recently audited the use of drones on the border and issued a scathing report,calling them "
" andessentially declaring them an enormous waste of money, time, and personnel. At
a flight hour (when not simply grounded), military-grade drones turned out to cost way more than the CBP estimated or reported, flew far less often, and helped find a mere 2% of the immigrants crossing the border without papers. As Craig Whitlock of the Washington Post
, "Less than one-tenth of 1 percent of border-crossing apprehensions were attributed to drone detection." The inspector general suggested that the CBP should, among other things, shelve its plans to expand its drone fleet (at the cost of a mere $443 million).
Based on such a report from the IG -- the CBP is part of the Department of Homeland Security -- you might assume that it would be curtains for the droneprogram. But if you're a betting kind of guy in twenty-first-century Washington, you're not going to put your money on any self-respecting part of the
giving up, or even cutting back, on its high-tech toys. Drones, after all, are sexy as hell and what self-respecting government official wouldn't want a machine onto which you could attach even more seductively high-tech devices like Vader (think deep, breathy voice, though the acronym stands for "Vehicle and Dismount Exploitation Radar"), a set of sensors that can detect motion on the ground. So CBP has instead struck back, accusing the inspector general of cherry-picking his data and misconstruing more or less everything.
Meanwhile, the drones continue to fly and the CBP, as Todd Miller who covers the
of
for TomDispatch has long noted, remains gagafor high-tech border toys of just about any sort. Today, in their piece "
," Miller and Gabriel Schivone suggest that, whatever waste and extravagance may be involved, our already heavily technologized borders and the increasingly robot-filled skies over them are just at the beginning of an era of border-closing high-tech extravaganzas. When it comes to visions of how to shut down the world, it's evidently time to call in the real experts, the Israelis, who live in a country without fully demarcated borders, and yet have had a remarkable amount of experience building
.