Tom Hayden

Tom Hayden

Posted: May 14, 2009 01:26 PM

Congressional Progressives Offer an Alternative to War

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

After six weeks of forums on Afghanistan-Pakistan, the Congressional Progressive Caucus is weighing a series of recommendations to de-escalate the war, offered by CPC co-chair Rep. Raul Grijalva and Rep. Mike Honda.

The good news for the peace movement is that the recommendations, taken together, present a plausible alternative to the Obama blueprint for escalation. The key proposals are to reverse the present ratio of military to development spending, leaving the Pentagon with twenty percent of the proposed budget, while eighty percent would be allocated to education, health, infrastructure, women's rights and development. Remaining US military operations would be folded under a United Nations security umbrella. Aerial attacks by US Predator drones would be immediately ended due to their adverse effect on civilian populations.

On the $84 billion for Afghanistan and Pakistan requested in the administration's proposed Supplemental Appropriations bill, Grijalva and Honda conclude that the measure would only "exacerbate the trends" they identify as counter-productive; they question whether the bill is worth funding at all.

Many in the anti-war community will be dissatisfied with the recommendations' failure to include an exit strategy with a withdrawal deadline. But the CPC recommendations represent a fundamental shift of priorities from the Obama policy. A more glaring omission is the lack of any reference to the human rights crisis at Afghanistan's Bagram prison, where Obama faces another Guantanamo.

The great value of these CPC recommendations, based on extensive hearings limited as they were to testimony by security experts and diplomats, is offset by the realities of a Democratic Congress presently unwilling to engage in open disagreements with the new President. The Grijalva-Honda recommendations are only advisory, not even reflective of an overall Progressive Caucus stance. At this point, none of the recommendations will be offered as amendments to the supplemental for up-or-down votes, so there will be no roll-call votes recorded.

The only proposals introduced thus far are a call for the Secretary of Defense to report on an exit strategy by this December [Rep. Jim McGovern] and a proposal approving the phased withdrawal pact signed by the Bush administration with Iraq [Rep. Sam Farr].

The CPC recommendations therefore constitute a constructive work product, but only an initial step in the future arguments within the Democratic Party and between Congress and the Obama administration. The increasing question from now on, spurred by the Grijalva-Honda report, will be whether to escalate or de-escalate from the quagmire.

After six weeks of forums on Afghanistan-Pakistan, the Congressional Progressive Caucus is weighing a series of recommendations to de-escalate the war, offered by CPC co-chair Rep. Raul Grijalva and R...
After six weeks of forums on Afghanistan-Pakistan, the Congressional Progressive Caucus is weighing a series of recommendations to de-escalate the war, offered by CPC co-chair Rep. Raul Grijalva and R...
 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- XME I'm a Fan of XME 26 fans permalink
photo

Alternatives to war are great...so long as those who want to wage war against them see the same alternatives and wnat to use alternatives. Unfortunately, that's rarely the case, and sometimes war is, quite simply, nothing but self-defense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 05/14/2009
photo

There was a war in the 1980s that produced a hollow victory. Russia was chased out of Afghanistan but no schools were built, no hospitals, no jobs.

The next generation growing up followed the only leaders they could find, Taliban, Al Qaeda. Most men and women in Afghanistan can not read or write. They only know what the religious leaders tell them.

We can move in and shoot the bad guys again but without building the schools the whole ugly nightmare will likely repeat.

So, yes, let's fund the development and draw down the military.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 05/14/2009

Hey, Tom!

What about al Qaeda? Remember them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 05/14/2009
photo

Yeah, we remember them. They attacked us on 9/11 and then our president's administration (with the help of good ol' Congress) rewarded them by providing ample recruitment fodder by torturing prisoners, not to mention slaughtering civilians in a questionable war and an illegal war. They struck at "our way of life" which was promptly thrown out the window to make way for fear, insecurity, lack of privacy, and fewer rights. I think we lost them in Pakistan, Yemen, Algeria, etc. Why do you ask?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 05/17/2009

Things never are as bad as they seem
So dream dream dream...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 05/14/2009
photo

Come on Tom. Forget about it.

Got Liz Cheney?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/14/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect