More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Vander Ark

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Vander Ark
 

Kevin Johnson: Read to Succeed

Posted: 11/05/11 12:45 PM ET

"All students should read at grade level by the end of third grade." Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson visited the Northwest this week on behalf of our friends at the League of Education Voters promoting this simple but important idea. It's a simple, important, and powerful message that is central to his Stand Up campaign in Sac and his new role as Education Chair of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

After retiring from the NBA in 2000, KJ returned to the Oak Park neighborhood of Sacramento where he grew up and started to turn things around. He became a one man economic development department, bought up a few dilapidated buildings and opened a coffee shop, a barber shop, and an art gallery.

In 2003, he set his sights on Sac High, the big bad neighborhood that pushed out more students than it graduated. Superintendent Jim Sweeny was an early leader in the urban portfolio strategy -- a district of choice featuring multiple operators -- and knew that closure and replacement was the only way to promote dramatic improvement in a reasonable amount of time. KJ's nonprofit, St. Hope, applied for and won a charter to open six schools on the Sac High campus. The schools have demonstrated significant improvement in graduation and college attendance rates as well as academic achievement.

Next Kevin launched an elementary school, PS 7, now recognized as one of the top performing schools in California. The long day and long year have reversed the achievement gap between this low income school and the schools serving affluent populations.

There are a few other all stars have helped to form academically successful schools, but KJ didn't stop there. In addition to being mayor of Sacramento, Johnson is one of the most important and effective advocates for education equality. Some folks here in the Northwest don't agree with his support for charter schools, but who can argue with his stand for high expectations and every student reading in third grade? Johnson told a crowd in Tacoma, "If education is the civil rights issue of our time, we need to be willing to pay the price." Johnson is recruiting other mayors to the reading campaign. As most states adopt higher Common Core standards, Johnson's mission is the right one at the right time for America's great cities.

 

Follow Tom Vander Ark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tvanderark

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:55 PM on 11/08/2011
Yes, Kevin Johnson is correct, but it's sometimes difficult for teachers to bring EVERY child up to grade level, say the child with lead poisoning or the one who visits his grandparents for three months every winter. But I have a really great idea: why doesn't Kevin Johnson teach a third grade class, bring everyone up to grade level in reading and then show all the teachers how to do it!! Now, isn't that brilliant?
08:00 AM on 11/08/2011
Learning to read needs to start at home. Waiting until a child starts school puts the child at a disadvantage. Parents need to turn off the TV, throw out video games, and take their kids to the library. To be a good reader, children need to read lots and lots of books. Millions and millions of words. There is no special program that will help a child become a better reader overnight. Reading is a skill that takes lots and lots of practice.
01:08 AM on 11/07/2011
Honestly, as stated in many other posts, reading success is a joint effort between school and family. I began reading to my child when he was 15 months old. I still read to him every night, and he is 7. I taught him to read with one of those "learn to read" books I found on Amazon. Now he reads chapter books, while his class is learning letter sounds and phonics.
My observation is that given a choice, my boy would prefer to watch tv or play video games. However, I force him to read to me every night and keep comic books in the car to occupy him during the long drive home from school...no Nintendo DS. I don't leave reading up to his school, or to him. I have to make this happen.
01:09 PM on 11/15/2011
I agree with your strategy and commend you. I have to hide the computer keyboard from my 13 yr. old andl struggle to motivate him.
My son and I belong to Stand Up and I know he is enlightened each time he attends an event.

I sincerely hope that you will consider joining our group.
05:39 PM on 11/06/2011
The teachers can't make students like reading or master reading. That is the job, to the extent that it can be driven, of the parents. The teachers can try and choose appropriate material that the students are likely to enjoy reading. But reading is something that is mastered by doing - and the teachers and schools don't really drive that.

My son-in-law is a high school English teacher and basketball coach. He couldn't be bothered to read as a kid until he realized that he could read about sports.

My kids are strong readers. But getting there took encouragement - we had to largely ban TV and all other screen diversions before my son would read. Even not, he will play video games or watch movies if he can get away with it. We time ration both, so he has to read a lot.

Don't blame teachers for this one. It is a parent and home environment issue.
05:18 PM on 11/06/2011
Sac Charter High and PS7 may be located in Oak Park, but they don't serve the children of the community. While Oak Park has neighboring district elementary schools with 40% English language Learners, PS7 has only 2%. It also has lower levels of poverty than neighboring schools. Sac Charter High School doesn't serve ELL kids either. Neither school serves Special Education students in numbers high enough to count in the schools AYP scores. Students who fall behind or at the high school level are credit deficient are counseled out of the schools. Both schools serve high numbers of children from outside the district whose parents have the means to drive them to the charter schools. Moreover, neither school reflects the diversity of Sacramento City unified School District located in the city called the most diverse in the nation. But students at both schools do well on standardized tests. I guess that's all that counts to this writer who didn't bother to some research before he wrote this glowing article.
09:03 AM on 11/06/2011
I don't think anybody would argue against the idea that all students should read at grade level by the end of third grade (and I think that setting up an argument by implying that some would is evidence of intellectual dishonesty).

Where many people would part company, I think, is where to place the blame when, inevitably, some don't. Blaming the teachers that are trying to help the kids instead of the parents holding them back isn't going to accomplish much of anything, but it's much more likely to lead to re-election than a more accurate assessment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
10:08 AM on 11/06/2011
Exactly. This really isn't a school or curriculum issue; it's about whether or not the student is getting the academic support s/he needs from family. Hard to practice reading at home if there are no books in the house. Hard to put the onus of a kid's success on schools, alone. Kids need to know their parents are behind them for positive reinforcement, as well as to mete out consequences for failure to make their education a priority over other pursuits.
11:18 AM on 11/06/2011
It's not hard at all to put the onus of a kid's success on schools; people like Kevin Johnson and Tom Vander Ark do it all the time, and provide facts and figures from charter schools with inherently VERY different student populations to "prove" it's true.

It's not hard to do. It's just inaccurate.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
08:43 AM on 11/06/2011
i am glad for the 1000-2000 students who are part of johnson's charter schools, if they're learning more than they would otherwise. however, that's not exactly a foregone conclusion. if you read the reviews, they're decidedly mixed. what stood out to me is that former students almost unanimously report that the education they received was not as high-quality as they thought it was before they graduated. is it saint hope, saint hype, or something in-between?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
05:51 PM on 11/05/2011
I've been a huge KJ fan for a long time. I think he means well, and is one of the most positive people ever to play professional sports.

That said, the fact that he's married to Michelle Rhee (weirdest thing in the world) makes me doubt that any education idea he has from this point on will be genuine.

And the fact that some charters are successful does not change the fact that they are, overall, a destructive force in education.

Like his wife.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbbbmer
An homage to Dorothy Parker...
08:00 PM on 11/05/2011
You need to learn more about KJ than your surface opinion reflects:

http://www.cncsig.gov/StHopeSR.html
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blindjester
English and ESL teacher
12:08 AM on 11/06/2011
I shared season tickets to watch him for years. Heard him interviewed dozens of times. I know he's a good guy.

I also know a lot more than I'm saying about charter schools. They're also an Arizona institution. And I don't support them.

I wish KJ good luck. But I don't get behind his initiatives to privatize public education.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roaddawg31
12:15 PM on 11/05/2011
Kevin Johnson is married to Michelle Rhee, who basically acts as an enemy to education if you ask most (tenured) teachers. This article illustrates that he's not only your typical talking-head politician, but someone who is trying to make a difference. AS IS HIS WIFE.

But as I said, she is demonized by tenured teachers, because she pushes for accountability in their ranks. And they don't like it.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
08:01 AM on 11/06/2011
i'm sure you're right that teachers have a kneejerk reaction to seeing their livelihoods threatened, but rhee deserves most of the criticism she gets. i don't doubt her motives or kj's, they're just imposing a model that does as much harm as good.
09:05 AM on 11/06/2011
Wow. Tenured teachers typically know at least something about education, and they think Rhee's horrible. You've proved again and again that you know essentially nothing about it, and you think she's good.

Who to believe?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roaddawg31
10:39 AM on 11/06/2011
Well, why do they think she's horrible? Is it because she is a hateful, clueless b!+ch? No, she obviously is a caring and highly educated person. Is she pushing a policy that is hurtful to students? No, her agenda is to bring the best teachers available into the classroom, and remove those who are underproducing. Why do they have such a dislike for her?

It's because she is trying to finally make them accountable. Currently in most districts, accountability is deemed according to superficial observations that are planned in advance. After which, a teacher is deemed in binary terms (effective/not effective). Consequently, nearly all teachers are deemed effective, to the point where most districts report effectiveness in the 99th percentile. In other words, accountability is a mere formality.

Rhee wants real accountability, and teachers don't like it. So they attack her, like you attack me. Teachers, who are supposed to be such beacons of light (e.g. you), acting in such an ignorant and spiteful way. So unbecoming.